Does MSNBC read their own site?

[Fritzo]

Michael Jackson Coverage Waning.....really?

 

[Bill Brasky]

The irony is overwhelming.

 

[MotionMan]

Originally posted by: Fritzo
Michael Jackson Coverage Waning.....really?

Well, there is that story about the Broderick/Parker twins...

MotionMan

 

[NFS4]

LMAO, that is just too funny

 

[techs]

Correction:
Michael Jackson Coverage Waning.....everywhere but here.

 

[TallBill]

Originally posted by: MotionMan

Originally posted by: Fritzo
Michael Jackson Coverage Waning.....really?

Well, there is that story about the Broderick/Parker twins...

MotionMan

Haha yeah, there is one story up not about him.

 

[drum]

Originally posted by: Fritzo
Michael Jackson Coverage Waning.....really?

waiit a minute. haha
stupid

 

[Joemonkey]

Originally posted by: Zaitsev
The ironing is delicious.

fix0red

 

[mugs]

That's funny... though in their defense that is in the Entertainment section.

 

[Jeff7]

So they now need articles about the number of articles they have on a particular subject?

 

[PlasmaBomb]

Originally posted by: Fritzo
Michael Jackson Coverage Waning.....really?

lulz!

 

[BW86]

lol

 

[mundane]

Originally posted by: Jeff7
So they now need articles about the number of articles they have on a particular subject?

meta-articles. Genius!

 

[PlasmaBomb]

Originally posted by: MotionMan

Originally posted by: Fritzo
Michael Jackson Coverage Waning.....really?

Well, there is that story about the Broderick/Parker twins...

MotionMan

That is the coverage starting to recede...

previously every story was MJ.

 

[MotionMan]

Originally posted by: PlasmaBomb

Originally posted by: MotionMan

Originally posted by: Fritzo
Michael Jackson Coverage Waning.....really?

Well, there is that story about the Broderick/Parker twins...

MotionMan

That is the coverage starting to recede...

previously every story was MJ.

Exactly.

MotionMan