Does more muscle mean less buoyancy?

Status
Not open for further replies.

nublikescake

Senior member
Jul 23, 2008
890
0
0
Let's say a guy with an average body works out and develops a good amount of muscle mass and lowers his body fat percentage compared with his earlier, average self (higher fat percentage). BUT...the surface area of his body has also increased all over.

Is he less buoyant now because of the increased muscle mass or does the increased surface area sort of counterbalance it? Or is the surface area negligible?

Anyone personally experience the above situation?
 

Crono

Lifer
Aug 8, 2001
23,720
1,503
136
Doesn't muscle have near equivalent amount of water (or perhaps higher than) as fat?
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Yep, less buoyant. I sink in fresh water but float in seawater. Muscle = more dense, fat = less dense.
 

invidia

Platinum Member
Oct 8, 2006
2,151
1
0
I was never taught much about fluid mechanics, despite having a physics degree. I would guess yes, since bouyancy is involved with mass and not much or anything to do with surface area.
 

Crono

Lifer
Aug 8, 2001
23,720
1,503
136
Originally posted by: spidey07
Yep, less buoyant. I sink in fresh water but float in seawater. Muscle = more dense, fat = less dense.

You dared to timewarp me?
:(
 

Pheran

Diamond Member
Apr 26, 2001
5,740
35
91
Muscle is denser than fat, so yes, if you lower your body fat percentage, you become less buoyant. Surface area has nothing to do with it. According to google, muscle density is approximately 1.06 g/ml whereas fat density is 0.9 g/ml.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: nublikescake
Damn. :( But but but....I've seen Ahhhnold swim in movies!

That's what your lungs are for - to prevent you from sinking like a rock. Anybody with a full breath of air will float or at the very least be able to tread water. It's when they let air out that they can start to sink.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.