You need to google for Supply, demand, and equilibrium.
Final cost of a product has NOTHING to do with its cost of production.
Thats why PS3's sell for less than they cost to make, and cars sell for 10 times what they cost to make.
You need to google for Supply, demand, and equilibrium.
Final cost of a product has NOTHING to do with its cost of production.
Thats why PS3's sell for less than they cost to make, and cars sell for 10 times what they cost to make.
Maybe you need to look it up. Cost of production very much has to do with the final price, it's just not the only component.
I am holding out for genetically engineered zebra skin that can be grown right on the surface. I want tiger in the bathroom and turtle for my swimming pool deck. I want my roof covered in cork bark six inches thick.
The production price has to do with how much you will profit or lose, it has nothig to do with final price to the buyer though.
The seller can TRY to assure he will make a profit, but in the end the buyer will only pay what the buyer is willing to pay, PERIOD.
No it doesnt cost them that much more. They are capitolizing as you said. We got SS when we moved in on all kitchen appliances. Biggest mistake we made. Would definatly take a do over and go black and save some money.
I prefer mine chrome plated.
Are you sure?
PS3s sell for less because they use the razor and blade model; not because of supply and demand. Although widely applicable to things, believe it or not supply and demand isn't the end all be all of economics.
Oh wait, price ceilings and floors ARE part of supply and demand. They're accounted for in ECON 101.
God damn I wish people would stop criticizing me when I know I'm right.
You need to google for Supply, demand, and equilibrium.
Final cost of a product has NOTHING to do with its cost of production.
Thats why PS3's sell for less than they cost to make, and cars sell for 10 times what they cost to make.
They use the blade and stick model because they HAVE to. The equilibrium price is below the cost of production. They dont have any other choice. If they tried to do a standard 10 or 20 percent markup no one would buy them.
The Wii sells at a profit and they make money off the games. Their equilibrium price is above the cost of production.
You think Sony WANTS to sell units at a loss? And reason supply and demand isnt the end all be all is because of political pressure to fuck with prices, like housing, oil, and utilities.
Oh wait, price ceilings and floors ARE part of supply and demand. They're accounted for in ECON 101.
God damn I wish people would stop criticizing me when I know I'm right.
FUCK!
Got to fap now.
You need to google for Supply, demand, and equilibrium.
Final cost of a product has NOTHING to do with its cost of production.
Thats why PS3's sell for less than they cost to make, and cars sell for 10 times what they cost to make.
Sorry dude, you don't know what you're talking about.
<snip>
You really think it costs LVMH 50x what it costs Adidas to make a bag? It is all about the user's willingness to pay based on their preferences.
How well do you think a hot pink, shit brown, and puke green fridge would sell? Black? They both have the same innards and the same $0.50 coating of paint on them.
You are forgetting the supply part of supply and demand.
What people are willing to pay depends largely on what's available in the market...
Wrong. Period, srsly, WRONG.
What you are willing to pay is what you are willing to pay, PERIOD.
True. But to deny the supply side is foolish if demand is high enough.
Deny what? If the price is higher than what I am willing to pay.. then I don't buy. The shorter supply or higher demand has ZERO EFFECT on what my price point is. If YOU don't value SS appliances, then you are not obligated to pay for them. No one is making you put a higher value on something.
