Does it bother you when MS products call home?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,919
19,148
136
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: skace
I purchase all my software so I am not bothered when an MS product calls home because most of the call home functionality is to my benefit. Ensuring drivers are up to date, security patches in place and that debug error codes get reported properly. Shrug.

I hope you're not suggesting that I didn't purchase my software.

You also said most, so how about the stuff that *isn't* for your benifit?

As long as you are legal...who cares? Actually you have no idea what it's calling home for. It could all be beneficial...it could all not be. Who's to say. But as long as you are legit, it shouldn't matter.

Hm... how could it be beneficial? Not to say it's not, I'm just curious to know what the benefits to the consumer might be.
 

LikeLinus

Lifer
Jul 25, 2001
11,518
670
126
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: skace
I purchase all my software so I am not bothered when an MS product calls home because most of the call home functionality is to my benefit. Ensuring drivers are up to date, security patches in place and that debug error codes get reported properly. Shrug.

I hope you're not suggesting that I didn't purchase my software.

You also said most, so how about the stuff that *isn't* for your benifit?

As long as you are legal...who cares? Actually you have no idea what it's calling home for. It could all be beneficial...it could all not be. Who's to say. But as long as you are legit, it shouldn't matter.

Hm... how could it be beneficial? Not to say it's not, I'm just curious to know what the benefits to the consumer might be.

Checking for important security updates?
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: skace
I purchase all my software so I am not bothered when an MS product calls home because most of the call home functionality is to my benefit. Ensuring drivers are up to date, security patches in place and that debug error codes get reported properly. Shrug.

When they start putting the EULAs on the outside of the boxes, I'll start to give a shiat about them. I don't agree to contracts that I can't read first, including the part about "by opening the package you agree to the EULA".
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
If connecting to the Internet is central to the application's purpose, such as a multiplayer game or a mail application, then there's nothing wrong with that. If an application needs to connect for any other reason, I should be asked first. Give me the option to do automatic or manual updates. There's no other reason for it to phone home, and I should be able to disable even that if I wish... WITHOUT a firewall.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
Originally posted by: Staples
Yes but I understand it is a necessary evil.

BULLSH1T.

There are thousands of software companies all doing very well without playing "big-brother".

Unfortunately, one of the companies that's doing well, (Valve) is playing big-brother.
I'm worried the trend will continue. It may make me switch over to Linux or something else. Especially if I get tired of all the crap video games being published and decide I dont need the latest and greatest Microsoft OS.