• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Does it bother any of you conservatives Bush Told "half-truths"?

Zebo

Zebo

Elite Member
Remember during the Speech on Febuary 26th when bush said he'd have a UN vote on a new resolution "to see where they stand" but now has reniged on the promise he made? This is'nt the first lie bush tells us. And it's not a serious lie but is honesty even cared about anymore by us rupbs/dems alike so long as it meets our politcal objectives? We seem very dismisive of holding politicians accountable for what they say.
 
No, I don't. He never said he was going to absolutely get a new resolution, he said he was looking to get one, and maybe would get one.
 
Originally posted by: dcpsoguy
No, I don't. He never said he was going to absolutely get a new resolution, he said he was looking to get one, and maybe would get one.
Click to expand...


I can't find the quote but he did say we would have a vote either way.
 
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: dcpsoguy
No, I don't. He never said he was going to absolutely get a new resolution, he said he was looking to get one, and maybe would get one.
Click to expand...


I can't find the quote but he did say we would have a vote either way.
Click to expand...

With idiots like france, what would be the good? Situations change.

<--- Democrat, but i support Bush in his effort.
 
Doesn't matter nearly as much as when clinton said he didn't get a blowjob from some chick.
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: yoda291
the sky is blue
water is wet
politicians lie.
Click to expand...

So basically what you're saying is nothing the government tells us can be taken for granted without independant verification. One can't have it both ways. Trusting when it fits our ideals and not trusting when it does'nt. So I guess my next question is can we believe any of the stated objectives and proof they have offered over 12 years?
 
Originally posted by: notfred
Doesn't matter nearly as much as when clinton said he didn't get a blowjob from some chick.
rolleye.gif
Click to expand...

I give Clinton props for that 🙂
 
Originally posted by: brxndxn
it makes me mad that bush went to the un
Click to expand...

Yup..

The UN is a bunch of flying pink pansies wearing nothing but daisies sucking on lollipops ignorant of the stuff outside.
Click to expand...

Ya ya we know the UN is a bunch of sissies, however, once you choose this route back in 91' and continue till today I think you owe an obligation to complete it along those lines. No? The UN was very beneficial to us in paying for the effort and with a little help militarly and now to show our gradtitude for thier sacrifices we say fusk off?
 
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Remember during the SotU when bush said he'd have a UN vote on a new resolution "to see where they stand" but now has reniged on the promise he made? This is'nt the first lie bush tells us. And it's not a serious lie but is honesty even cared about anymore by us rupbs/dems alike so long as it meets our politcal objectives? We seem very dismisive of holding politicians accountable for what they say.
Click to expand...

I believe they had plans to call a vote on a new resolution this week, but they did cancel that vote when France vowed to veto "any" new resolution, correct? That's what I heard anyway. Why take a vote when you're guaranteed to be vetoed?
 
Originally posted by: everman
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Remember during the SotU when bush said he'd have a UN vote on a new resolution "to see where they stand" but now has reniged on the promise he made? This is'nt the first lie bush tells us. And it's not a serious lie but is honesty even cared about anymore by us rupbs/dems alike so long as it meets our politcal objectives? We seem very dismisive of holding politicians accountable for what they say.
Click to expand...

I believe they had plans to call a vote on a new resolution this week, but they did cancel that vote when France vowed to veto "any" new resolution, correct? That's what I heard anyway. Why take a vote when you're guaranteed to be vetoed?
Click to expand...

France had said they would veto any resolution guaranteeing the use of force.
 
It's not a lie, you need to change your mind sometimes when the circumstances change, utherwise you would be a fool.
 
Does it bother any of you conservatives Bush lied again?
Click to expand...
Not anymore than Clinton lieing about sex or other things............Bush 1 about taxes among other things.........Reagan about all sorts of things.....(pre altheimers????LOL) .........................Carter......................Ford...................Nixon..................Johnson...............Kennedy............................and so on!😉
 
Originally posted by: everman
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Remember during the SotU when bush said he'd have a UN vote on a new resolution "to see where they stand" but now has reniged on the promise he made? This is'nt the first lie bush tells us. And it's not a serious lie but is honesty even cared about anymore by us rupbs/dems alike so long as it meets our politcal objectives? We seem very dismisive of holding politicians accountable for what they say.
Click to expand...

I believe they had plans to call a vote on a new resolution this week, but they did cancel that vote when France vowed to veto "any" new resolution, correct? That's what I heard anyway. Why take a vote when you're guaranteed to be vetoed?
Click to expand...

"to see where they stand" and "we're calling them out" and those types of nice colloquial sayings Bush is fond of using, to mean we want it in writting. Why not is a better question since he said he would.
 
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Remember during the SotU when bush said he'd have a UN vote on a new resolution "to see where they stand" but now has reniged on the promise he made? This is'nt the first lie bush tells us. And it's not a serious lie but is honesty even cared about anymore by us rupbs/dems alike so long as it meets our politcal objectives? We seem very dismisive of holding politicians accountable for what they say.
Click to expand...

Chiraq made it clear that he would veto ANY resolution. The purpose of the forcing a vote was to get members of the security council to show their cards.

The French have already showed theirs so what's the point.

President Bush has made this clear. You're just not listening.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top