• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Does child rape cause physical damage?

Specop 007

Specop 007

Diamond Member
So, reading about that asshat who raped a 3 year old, I was wondering about people like that. Doesnt it actually cause physical damage to rape a child that young? I would think it would have the chance to cause serious phsyical damages to a young child.

So fvckin sad.
 
Originally posted by: Specop 007
So, reading about that asshat who raped a 3 year old, I was wondering about people like that. Doesnt it actually cause physical damage to rape a child that young? I would think it would have the chance to cause serious phsyical damages to a young child.

So fvckin sad.
Click to expand...

HTF can you be able to use a computer and be this ignorant! 😕

edit: minendo beat me to it 😱
 
Maybe because
1) I dont think about this kind of sh1t. Not even a tiny little bit
and
2) I dont follow news stories about this sick sh1t either.

You guys do the math. Sorry, but sitting around pondering child rape isnt something I routinely do, so i dont have any answers on it.
 
Originally posted by: Specop 007Doesnt it actually cause physical damage to rape a child that young?
Click to expand...

I know little about biology, and less about developmental biology, but my gut tells me that the birth canal of a three-year old should be around the size of a dime in diameter and maybe the length of a Bic ink pen.

Unless the rapist was Needledick, she's probably scarred. For life would be a different question though. No bones about it though, it would've hurt like hell.

For her sake, I hope she never remembers.
 
i think he has been getting too much hostility here on ATOT
just answer his question and it should reduce the tension.
 
Wow, no deduction skills at all huh? How big a kid is compared to a grown woman should have clued you in. As bad as the unlevel water in the link in my sig.
 
Originally posted by: edmundoab
i think he has been getting too much hostility here on ATOT
just answer his question and it should reduce the tension.
Click to expand...

But such a stupid question deserves hostility
 
This is not as stupid a question as you guys are making it out to be.

In general, the vagina is highly elastic, but until a girl reaches puberty, the vaginal area is much less elastic, and prone to tearing. Even so, the rape of a 3-year-old may not create meaningful injury. I have, unfortunately, seen many vaginal pictures of small girls who've been raped, and they often show no significant damage.
 
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Maybe because
1) I dont think about this kind of sh1t. Not even a tiny little bit
and
2) I dont follow news stories about this sick sh1t either.

You guys do the math. Sorry, but sitting around pondering child rape isnt something I routinely do, so i dont have any answers on it.
Click to expand...
A woman having sex for the first time causes physical damage.
 
thats good to know.
i guess as children, the wound healing time frame is alot shorter as compared to adults too
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
This is not as stupid a question as you guys are making it out to be.

In general, the vagina is highly elastic, but until a girl reaches puberty, the vaginal area is much less elastic, and prone to tearing. Even so, the rape of a 3-year-old may not create meaningful injury. I have, unfortunately, seen many vaginal pictures of small girls who've been raped, and they often show no significant damage.
Click to expand...

why??
 
Originally posted by: Shawn
Originally posted by: DonVito
This is not as stupid a question as you guys are making it out to be.

In general, the vagina is highly elastic, but until a girl reaches puberty, the vaginal area is much less elastic, and prone to tearing. Even so, the rape of a 3-year-old may not create meaningful injury. I have, unfortunately, seen many vaginal pictures of small girls who've been raped, and they often show no significant damage.
Click to expand...

why??
Click to expand...

Why, what?
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Shawn
Originally posted by: DonVito
This is not as stupid a question as you guys are making it out to be.

In general, the vagina is highly elastic, but until a girl reaches puberty, the vaginal area is much less elastic, and prone to tearing. Even so, the rape of a 3-year-old may not create meaningful injury. I have, unfortunately, seen many vaginal pictures of small girls who've been raped, and they often show no significant damage.
Click to expand...

why??
Click to expand...

Why, what?
Click to expand...

If I had to guess he wants to know why you're looking at "vaginal pictures of small girls."

😉

I know why, but many here may not.

Viper GTS
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Shawn
Originally posted by: DonVito
This is not as stupid a question as you guys are making it out to be.

In general, the vagina is highly elastic, but until a girl reaches puberty, the vaginal area is much less elastic, and prone to tearing. Even so, the rape of a 3-year-old may not create meaningful injury. I have, unfortunately, seen many vaginal pictures of small girls who've been raped, and they often show no significant damage.
Click to expand...

why??
Click to expand...

Why, what?
Click to expand...

Why have you seen many vaginal pictures of small girls who've been raped????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top