Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: Venix
The point is that only an idiot needs the word "homicide" tacked on to figure out that the intent of the bombing is to murder. "Suicide bombing" is a more accurate term, since it both describes the act and clearly implies the intent to kill others. "Homicide bombing" is redundant, politicized nonsense that could be used to describe mailbox bombing, the OKC bombing, or any other explosion that kills people.
Well, thank you, you just summed up my thoughts.
RDWY, if you have more to contribute, please do, otherwise, stopped insulting the intelligence of the people here and step out of the thread.
Actually, the orginal argument was the difference/similarities between Japanese Kamikazies and Palestinian suicide bombers. First of all, suicide bombers are generally referred to terrorism. Japanese Kamikazies were used SPECIFICALLY in wartime, which is not related to terrorism. AND NO, I DO NOT CONSIDER THE SITUATION WITH ISRAEL/PALISTINE WARTIME. Those Palistinian bombers are specifically advocating terrorism. Second of all, bombs/bombing/bombers are not inherently related to homicide or death, as bombs are really aimed at blowing up specific targets, such as airports, buildings, and such, NOT PEOPLE. Therefore, bombs aimed at killing people should have an alternate name, such as "homicide" bombs/bombing.
Suicide bombing DOES NOT imply bombing to kill people, as one could easily strap a bomb to himself and blow himself up in the desert. Sure, its not practical, buts its LOGICAL. That would be the TRUE definition of suicide bombing.
So, in the context in which we use the term "suicide bombing", we should really refer to it as "terrorist suicide bombing", as the term, IMHO, is more correct.