• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Do you use System Restore in Windows XP?

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
I'm just curious. I've had issues with System Restore in the past and I'm wondering if anyone disables it. I use Norton Ghost to make recovery CDs for my computers and I don't really do much to them once they're installed, just add a new software package now and then and download updates once in awhile, so I wonder if it would be good or bad to disable System Restore.
 
I just leave it on. It's helped me once or twice in the past. This install of XP was an upgrade of 2k that was installed before Win2k SP1 was out. I don't bother keeping ghost images of my PC. Just too much work.
 
This is more a matter of style as you can see from the responses!

When I install XP, one of the first things I do is to disable system restore. I use Dive Image to create an image of my C drive. It takes me 3 minutes to restore it. System restore may take shorter. But, my image produces a predictable result always. I don't need system restore.

For someone who does not have an image or does not feel comfortable using an image, system restore is a must.
 
Originally posted by: guidot
I do not use Restore. It holds viruses and the like. I find for advanced users its not necessary.

Yes I agree with you there,there's nothing cleaner than a good image to restore to.

Ghost is one of the best apps ever made in my opinion.
 
Making a ghost image is great (and I do make them of my desktops periodically) but I still run (and occasionally use) system restore.

There are some things that you dont always want changed back that System Restore will leave "as is" and Ghost will overwrite, such as account passwords (it's sometimes hard to remember what the password you used on your 6 month old Ghost image is) and machine passwords (in the event that your machine is a domain member). You can also do a lot more frequent snapshots with system restore than is practical with Ghost (mostly due to the storage space required for full images).

I've got plenty of space on all my machines so I'm not too concerned with the space that system restore uses. As far as extra I/O and processor usage from running it the hits are very minimal (not enough to notice). So my thought here is "I've got it, and it wouldnt really hurt to run it, so why not..."
 
I always disable System Restore, as I find it uneccessary.

I just make an image of my OS drive and keep that as backup.
 
I always like the option to use system restore. I have not used it on any of *my* machines, but then again, my W2K install is about 3 years old. I have on user's machiens with great success. Nothing like hitting a few buttons and going back to a safe state.

Sure it can hold a virus, but how often are you infected? SOP for virus removal is disable system restore and scan in safe mode.
 
Originally posted by: scooter1
I turn off system restore and use Ghost to make a backup image.

I have 6 different images, one for each stage of my system build. I guess I'm kinda nutty...
 
For the LOVE OF GOD... Do not disable System Restore on your friends and relatives computers if they are computer neophytes. Can they reinstall XP? Do whatever you want. Do they call tech support? Please leave System Restore enabled. There is nothing like someone calling in with a dialup problem and doing a quick System Restore, after the normal troubleshooting methods, to get them back online.

You might think it blows but it is handy for those of us who work in tech support. Now if only these same neophytes could learn how to disable pop-up blockers in the 2-7 security and toolbar programs they have installed.
 
I never use it on my Pc but I leave it on on my friends PC's. For myself I hate it because

1. I do not need it and if I do have a problem with the OS I can fix it rather then using restore
2. Uses valuable disc space (it is not alot but it's still wasted disc space)
3. When used it actually causes problems with programs that were previously installed but wre no longer installed when you resored your PC.
 
I think system restore (after it saving my ass a few times) is a pretty good new implementation on windows. The reason why I like system restore is because some times I will have a bad install (either my fault or just a bad file) and it screwed up my system to a point where the only way to fix it was back. I "clean" out system restore about every month where I haven't had a restore (I check the restore calendar) and right before cleaning up I check to make sure that nothing is currently wrong with the system. So then I "clean up" system restore (disable and then reenable it agian). Then I create an image of the machine which helps a lot since I know how far back that first image is. My HDDs are much to big to create an image (80GB and 120GB), an image would absoulutely make sense if I were to use it for quick reinstalls of all of my settings, programs etc.. At first I used to disable system restore but after testing it out it seems it can help a lot.
 
I have used system restore twice to my benefit. I don't know if you people ghost your drives every day like system restore does, I'm sure that'd be a hassle. But the fact that it only takes me 2 minutes to restore my computer if something bad happens is something I wouldn't trade for anything.
 
Originally posted by: Kaido
I'm just curious. I've had issues with System Restore in the past and I'm wondering if anyone disables it. I use Norton Ghost to make recovery CDs for my computers and I don't really do much to them once they're installed, just add a new software package now and then and download updates once in awhile, so I wonder if it would be good or bad to disable System Restore.
I disable System Restore immediately by default. I swear by Ghost 2003 for backups. So thumbsdown to SR, thumbsup to Ghost. 🙂 Btw, there are numerous scenarios where Ghost 2003 will be able to save your butt, but SR won't, which is why I do the things that I do. (Severe filesystem damage due to viruses or malfunction, hardware errors/failures, etc.) The only downside is that Ghost isn't running continuously in the background, but since it takes under 10min for a disk-to-disk image, it's not that bad. I still don't backup as often as I should though.
 
Back
Top