• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Do you think this is worth my $50?

I currently have a pretty old but slick Elsa Gladiac GF2 GTS 32DDR (highest performance among all GF2 GTS).

I could get a Visiontek GF3 Ti 200 64mb for $50. Do you think it's worth the money? What kind of performance increase should I expect? And I assume this'd be far faster than GF4 MX bullsh|t right? I can even sell my old card for $20~...
 
A lot of the Ti200's overclock like a dream. When I had mine, it was running at Ti500 speeds, so for $50, I'd say go for it.

yes, it'll perform better than a GF4 MX. You're basically running a GF4 MX now.
 
You can sell your card for more than $20 bucks. I sold my Creative Labs GTS for $37 a month ago and upgraded to a Ti500. As for performance increase, you'll notice the difference playing games like Warcraft III. But don't expect Counterstrike or the like to run faster.
 
Yes, its better then anything with an MX in the name.

As far as speed boost, check out old reviews of the GF3's. They probably compare it to a card similar to your current one. I'm sure anadtech has a review like that 😀
 
Originally posted by: dafatha00
You can sell your card for more than $20 bucks. I sold my Creative Labs GTS for $37 a month ago and upgraded to a Ti500. As for performance increase, you'll notice the difference playing games like Warcraft III. But don't expect Counterstrike or the like to run faster.

how is that so? wariii vs cs?
 
how is that so? wariii vs cs?

CS is 3(??) year old technology and really doens't benefit from better performing cards. WCIII is a newer game that takes advantage of the faster video cards.
 
you can sell the GTS for 40$ for sure, and if you get the TI200 for 50$, then its definately worth it 😀
 
Originally posted by: LOLyourFace
further info plzz

in counterstrike:

my gf1 ddr in a duron 800 system = 100fps @ 1024x768x32bit
my gf3 ti200 @ ti500 speeds in a xp1700 = 100fps @ 1024x768x32bit

unless you're running an insanely high resolution, no noticable gains.

oh, and yeah. i'd go for it!
 
Originally posted by: dakata24
Originally posted by: LOLyourFace
further info plzz

in counterstrike:

my gf1 ddr in a duron 800 system = 100fps @ 1024x768x32bit
my gf3 ti200 @ ti500 speeds in a xp1700 = 100fps @ 1024x768x32bit

unless you're running an insanely high resolution, no noticable gains.

oh, and yeah. i'd go for it!

I have a p4 1.6GHz oc'd to 2.54GHz with a GeForce4 Ti4600 and CS only registers 100fps.

rolleye.gif


You're getting more than 100 fps, CS just isn't correctly reporting how high.
 
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
Originally posted by: dakata24
Originally posted by: LOLyourFace
further info plzz

in counterstrike:

my gf1 ddr in a duron 800 system = 100fps @ 1024x768x32bit
my gf3 ti200 @ ti500 speeds in a xp1700 = 100fps @ 1024x768x32bit

unless you're running an insanely high resolution, no noticable gains.

oh, and yeah. i'd go for it!

I have a p4 1.6GHz oc'd to 2.54GHz with a GeForce4 Ti4600 and CS only registers 100fps.

rolleye.gif


You're getting more than 100 fps, CS just isn't correctly reporting how high.


Gotta love geeks and their stick up the buttness about their frames per seconds. :Q "oh yeah?? well, I'm really getting 300 fps instead of 100!!"

I think his point is that you're not going to see a difference in that situation.

 
visiontek website says it's 47% better than my current card. (ran the analysis)

but i think it could be more because it's 64mb and i can finally run high res textures on war3 without lagging (runs very smooth on medium though)
 
Originally posted by: OS
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
Originally posted by: dakata24
Originally posted by: LOLyourFace
further info plzz

in counterstrike:

my gf1 ddr in a duron 800 system = 100fps @ 1024x768x32bit
my gf3 ti200 @ ti500 speeds in a xp1700 = 100fps @ 1024x768x32bit

unless you're running an insanely high resolution, no noticable gains.

oh, and yeah. i'd go for it!

I have a p4 1.6GHz oc'd to 2.54GHz with a GeForce4 Ti4600 and CS only registers 100fps.

rolleye.gif


You're getting more than 100 fps, CS just isn't correctly reporting how high.


Gotta love geeks and their stick up the buttness about their frames per seconds. :Q "oh yeah?? well, I'm really getting 300 fps instead of 100!!"

I think his point is that you're not going to see a difference in that situation.

yup.

sounds like you're enjoying your new video card. have you had a chance to try and overclock it? i highly recommend (and others as well) RivaTuner.


Happy Holidays! 🙂
 
Back
Top