do you think people will be able to read this post in 500 years?

brianmanahan

Lifer
Sep 2, 2006
24,670
6,034
136
i was just thinking about the future, and then i realized that by the time all the cool stuff happens i will probably be dead. but i at least want my legacy to live on in the form of my posts!

do you suppose that in the year 2513, someone will be able to read this post?
 

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,122
1,594
126
What makes you think these posts will be of any more interest to people in the future than the writings of people 500 years in the past are to us? A serious question.
 

HamburgerBoy

Lifer
Apr 12, 2004
27,111
318
126
What makes you think these posts will be of any more interest to people in the future than the writings of people 500 years in the past are to us? A serious question.

I'm pretty that some people would be quite thrilled to uncover writings of someone from 500 years ago. Of course, with the extreme abundance of information today and the inevitable increase of it over time, the forgotten musings of Joe Peasant become devalued.
 

SKORPI0

Lifer
Jan 18, 2000
18,500
2,426
136
We can't even read post from the early days of atot, and how do you expect 500 years from now to do so? . :rolleyes:
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,447
35,075
136
I bet sarcasm will be difficult to detect by then given linguistic drift. They will likely be thinking "Gazooks! Those people were stupid."
 

nickbits

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2008
4,122
1
81
The data will probably exist somewhere but no one will have access to it. You'll need to find your immorality elsewhere. Have kids like normal people I guess.
 

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,122
1,594
126
I bet sarcasm will be difficult to detect by then given linguistic drift. They will likely be thinking "Gazooks! Those people were stupid."

Very true. It really irks me that most people think our ancestors 500 or even 5000 years in the past were not very bright. They seem to equate the lack of technology with the inability to think.
 

brianmanahan

Lifer
Sep 2, 2006
24,670
6,034
136
Have kids like normal people I guess.

lol, like i have any chance of that happening...

i think i am going to have to come up with a means of creating artifacts that will stand the test of time, and will be able to be discovered by people who search for them or stumble across them

maybe i should look into using stone or some metal as a medium

man... just thinking about 500 years from now is currently blowing my mind. it all seems so exciting! too bad i will miss out on it :( but ah, cest la vie :awe:
 

Gintaras

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2000
1,892
1
71
i read stuff from 500 years ago all the time

shakespeare, newton, da vinci

And you wonder, if anyone 500 years later would wonder who brianmanahan was?

brianmanahan - neither shakespeare, nor newton, nor da vinci...

500 years agho, there thousands and millions of brianmanahans lived...do you read any of theses?
 

brianmanahan

Lifer
Sep 2, 2006
24,670
6,034
136
Very true. It really irks me that most people think our ancestors 500 or even 5000 years in the past were not very bright. They seem to equate the lack of technology with the inability to think.

i think the biggest thing that contributes to the perceived lack of brightness was just how brutal society and social leadership could be

people think things are bad now (see p&n for details), but all of us would crap our pants if we had to live like people did 500 years ago (and much moreso 5000 years ago). the power of the rulers could be virtually limitless

it was probably very much like game of thrones
 

amdhunter

Lifer
May 19, 2003
23,332
249
106
No. When the Anandtech homepage and forums die off later this year, it will no longer be accessible.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
I bet sarcasm will be difficult to detect by then given linguistic drift. They will likely be thinking "Gazooks! Those people were stupid."
It was interesting to read a properly footnoted play, Lysistrata. It was written in Greek, well over 2000 years ago. Puns and wordplay don't translate well, across languages or long time periods. And of course, pop culture references don't age well. The footnotes explained that sort of thing.
We've got a ridiculous number of unintuitive phrases or references.
The whole nine yards, up to my eyes in <blank>, "I wouldn't know him from Adam," that's bullshit, you're pulling my leg, three fries short of a Happy Meal - and so on. Try translating that verbatim, and see if someone will understand the context, especially if you try some wordplay.
"Why was that guy pulling on the other person's leg? Was his foot stuck under something? And why does this one character continually reference bovine excrement, even though they are nowhere near a farm?"

Or here we go, from Whose Line, at the end of a lengthy setup: "Only Hugh can prevent florist friars."
It requires knowledge of Playboy, Smokey Bear, and the current pronunciations used in the English language.

It's probably a big part of why Shakespeare just doesn't do anything for me. Bleh, I hated reading that stuff, never did see the big appeal. I bet he was just writing cheap bits of entertainment so that he could pay his bills. :D


Either way, if just some shred of this forum survives, I nominate NuclearNed's posts, for an idea of our culture, and Rubycon's posts for a record of our technological level.
 
Last edited:

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,122
1,594
126
i think the biggest thing that contributes to the perceived lack of brightness was just how brutal society and social leadership could be

people think things are bad now (see p&n for details), but all of us would crap our pants if we had to live like people did 500 years ago (and much moreso 5000 years ago). the power of the rulers could be virtually limitless

it was probably very much like game of thrones

Only through the 'modern' looking glass. The reality is that different ways of living worked for the times that they existed and were no more "brutal" than allowing corporate profits to determine our lifestyle today.
 

brianmanahan

Lifer
Sep 2, 2006
24,670
6,034
136
And you wonder, if anyone 500 years later would wonder who brianmanahan was?

brianmanahan - neither shakespeare, nor newton, nor da vinci...

500 years agho, there thousands and millions of brianmanahans lived...do you read any of theses?

good point sir

i have actually tried to find writings from my ancestors, some who i have tried back to the 1300s

i did find some writings from one of them - john harrington (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harington_(writer)) he was an advisor to queen elizabeth I - and the real inventor of the flush toilet!

he wrote something which the queen thought was too edgy, so she got mad at him for a while - that is what i was reading of his

he is also known for the famous saying, "Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason? Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason."
 

brianmanahan

Lifer
Sep 2, 2006
24,670
6,034
136
Only through the 'modern' looking glass. The reality is that different ways of living worked for the times that they existed and were no more "brutal" than allowing corporate profits to determine our lifestyle today.

getting beheaded for something is a lot more brutal than anything that corporate profits will do to you