- Sep 3, 2004
- 11,060
- 1
- 0
yesterday we read part of a paper on islam and democracy, and one of its conclusions was that middle eastern countries are no more politically violent than other regions, despite what we see to the contrary. Do you blieve this to be true, despite all the suicides and only terrorist acts that we see in the media?
(the same article concluded that economic underdevelopment and islam itself were the two biggest deteminers on whether a country would be democratic or not)
edit:
Political violence as in within a state, citizen against the governemnt.
a political action could be a march, a party caucus, a riot, a coup, etc. A riot and a coup would clearly be violent, as would bombing a governemnt office, etc.
i would not consider an invasion to be a political act, or civil war, or guerilla war.
(the same article concluded that economic underdevelopment and islam itself were the two biggest deteminers on whether a country would be democratic or not)
edit:
Political violence as in within a state, citizen against the governemnt.
a political action could be a march, a party caucus, a riot, a coup, etc. A riot and a coup would clearly be violent, as would bombing a governemnt office, etc.
i would not consider an invasion to be a political act, or civil war, or guerilla war.