Originally posted by: faenix
Actually Polos are $40. Jeans go up to $60. Sweaters range from $40-70. haha.
Originally posted by: FleshLight
I think we're exaggerating a bit on the prices here. Even Levi's prices their jeans at $45 at most department stores excluding wally world.
Polos at AF are usually $30, which also is the norm for most "designer" polos (nautica, polo, tommy, Express, etc). Pants/Jeans usually go for $30-40. Sweaters can range from $20-40.
Originally posted by: faenix
You can yap yap yap all about how Wall Mart is better than A&F but seriously its our preference.
If I want to spend $40 on a vintage polo shirt that gets me brand name recognition, so be it, it's my money anyway.
Don't see why you guys like yapping so much. You like your wal mart garbage? Be my guest and keep wearing wall mart garbage.
I like my Abercrombie thanks.
Exactly my thoughts. All I wear is A&F and Hollister
Originally posted by: hdeck
stfu, af IS overpriced
Originally posted by: Anubis
see faenix im the exact oppisate of you because women the blow stupid amounts of money on plaid scarfs and silly black handbags turn me off, walmart might turn me off as well i was just useing the for sake of arguement
:thumbsup:Originally posted by: csf
Heh I did this thread on another board today with the same results. My thoughts, summed up:
1. People who complain about people spending money on more expensive clothing are annoying as hell, because there are legitimate differences in clothing quality, as well as personal tastes, that justify the increased price spent...
However, A&F is total crap clothing and not in any way a real "name brand," "designer label," or "luxury clothing," nor is it expensive in the grand scheme of the clothing industry, and anyone who is going to claim it is has no clue whatsoever. Therefore,
2. People who like to act like wearing A&F makes them superior/stylish/knowledgeable about fashion or clothing are idiots and clueless posers who should just shut up, because their existance is why there are so many annoying types mentioned in point 1.
Originally posted by: csf
Heh I did this thread on another board today with the same results. My thoughts, summed up:
1. People who complain about people spending money on more expensive clothing are annoying as hell, because there are legitimate differences in clothing quality, as well as personal tastes, that justify the increased price spent...
However, A&F is total crap clothing and not in any way a real "name brand," "designer label," or "luxury clothing," nor is it expensive in the grand scheme of the clothing industry, and anyone who is going to claim it is has no clue whatsoever. Therefore,
2. People who like to act like wearing A&F makes them superior/stylish/knowledgeable about fashion or clothing are idiots and clueless posers who should just shut up, because their existance is why there are so many annoying types mentioned in point 1.
Originally posted by: Anubis
see faenix im the exact oppisate of you because women the blow stupid amounts of money on plaid scarfs and silly black handbags turn me off, walmart might turn me off as well i was just useing the for sake of arguement
Originally posted by: KPSHAH316
Originally posted by: Anubis
see faenix im the exact oppisate of you because women the blow stupid amounts of money on plaid scarfs and silly black handbags turn me off, walmart might turn me off as well i was just useing the for sake of arguement
counter to that-when I see a woman with $300 scarf/handbag, I feel she is a whore, piker, or getting money from her parents/boyfirend/sugar daddy. I really don't know if she's some executive who actually bought that. On the other hand, when a guy dresses well, its human nature to compete with him, or at least acknowledge the fact that he is dressed well. "Woah thats a nice shirt must have been expensive." When I see a chick with the same purse as her friends, "What a dumb whore, just trying to be lik everyone else." So I guess I'm biased then.
Originally posted by: BillGates
I have a lot of Abercrombie clothes and seem to be better-dressed than a majority of people that I see. I also have an attractive girlfriend.
This is the most moronic place to discuss fashion that I can think of. Most here have no concept of what is "nice" and think that Walmart clothes is all that anybody needs. Enjoy trying to be successful in life when you get a job working in a nice cushy office wearing that stuff. Appearance *does* matter in the real world.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: KPSHAH316
Originally posted by: Anubis
see faenix im the exact oppisate of you because women the blow stupid amounts of money on plaid scarfs and silly black handbags turn me off, walmart might turn me off as well i was just useing the for sake of arguement
counter to that-when I see a woman with $300 scarf/handbag, I feel she is a whore, piker, or getting money from her parents/boyfirend/sugar daddy. I really don't know if she's some executive who actually bought that. On the other hand, when a guy dresses well, its human nature to compete with him, or at least acknowledge the fact that he is dressed well. "Woah thats a nice shirt must have been expensive." When I see a chick with the same purse as her friends, "What a dumb whore, just trying to be lik everyone else." So I guess I'm biased then.
I think you're just a woman hater.
Originally posted by: KPSHAH316
Originally posted by: csf
Heh I did this thread on another board today with the same results. My thoughts, summed up:
1. People who complain about people spending money on more expensive clothing are annoying as hell, because there are legitimate differences in clothing quality, as well as personal tastes, that justify the increased price spent...
However, A&F is total crap clothing and not in any way a real "name brand," "designer label," or "luxury clothing," nor is it expensive in the grand scheme of the clothing industry, and anyone who is going to claim it is has no clue whatsoever. Therefore,
2. People who like to act like wearing A&F makes them superior/stylish/knowledgeable about fashion or clothing are idiots and clueless posers who should just shut up, because their existance is why there are so many annoying types mentioned in point 1.
this is all true, but I don't think anyone gets my point about AF not being overpriced. Simple as this:
You want to look cool among your peers, "high schoolers imitating the OC," you buy this brand.
You get what you pay for, and everyone knows what you've paid...
However, I know it is garbage, and I have not owned a single article of clothing from there.
Yeah, AE used to be great a looong time ago, when they weren't well known they weren't pushing the "I'm a yuppie in surfer's clothing" line.fixed-sorry boys, but AE is even more garbage. It's style is, "middle class hick."
