That is some seriously stupid shit. I have lost respect for Merriam Webster dictionary. How can a word have two competing definitions?
dictionaries are records of word use, though. Not so much a manual for what words
explicitly mean. It's easy to confuse those two, however.
But yes, I think it is still stupid. In certain cases, general usage for words is sujugated by the throngs of imbeciles: irregardless is now "a word," even though the actual word, "regardless," already exists and has the exact same use.
"Literally," quite literally, no longer means, "literally." :hmm:
As for OPs question, yes.
But I am a firm believer in picking yourself up. I am a believer in providing opportunities for success for those that are less privileged, but I am not a believer in simply handing success over in any way.
Pretty much. The problem with applying that belief to the case of the general Native American territory is that you can't ignore the fact that they were overtly subjugated and forced into generations of poverty, with little recompense and opportunity to escape that.
And, is as you say.
I think only a soulless muffinhead would not feel sympathy for that plight.