• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Do you always install Chipset Device Software after a clean install?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
well the first evidence as the version on WU is usually older than the most recent nVIDIA ones. and we all know how much of a performance increase each nVIDIA update brings as they do mention the performance increase everytime for which games in the change log.
An older version doesn't mean it's not the same. IE, what makes Windows Update's 327.23, for example, different than any other 327.23?
 
An older version doesn't mean it's not the same. IE, what makes Windows Update's 327.23, for example, different than any other 327.23?
if the versions are the same then they're the same, but are they?

can you post a pic of the WU driver update from nVIDIA? click on details next to it it will show the version
 
well the first evidence as the version on WU is usually older than the most recent nVIDIA ones. and we all know how much of a performance increase each nVIDIA update brings as they do mention the performance increase everytime for which games in the change log.

Yes, it's true that for nVidia and AMD GPU drivers, WU usually lags behind what they post on their websites. My guess is that NV and AMD prefer to release it to a relatively smaller, more tech-savvy audience of people who manually download drivers before releasing it to a far larger audience via WU.

But then let's look at Intel's GPU drivers. Much of the time, the WU Intel GPU drivers lag behind their download center drivers. But there have been times when the reverse had happened: an Intel GPU driver appears in WU first and then, weeks later, finally on Intel's website. In one extreme case that I've personally encountered (their G965 GPU drivers), the latest version on Intel's website is years older than what's found on WU (the version on WU also fixes a brightness control issue that's present if you used the driver from Intel's website).

My point is, none of this is Microsoft's decision. It's not their fault. Nor is it WU's fault. If you don't like that WU's nVidia GPU drivers lag behind what you can download direct from nVidia, you should take your complaint up with whoever at nVidia is in charge of their driver releases, because that is the person who's responsible for the version difference. Similarly, if I wanted to protest that Intel had basically abandoned the G965 chipset on their website (though not on WU), I should be blaming Intel (though in that case, I really don't care, since WU's more convenient anyway). What you see on WU is what the manufacturer wants you to see, and it, not surprisingly, varies.
 
Last edited:
GFX drivers are not a good example as there always in a state of change compared to most chipset drivers.

Cerb and Code65536 hit the nail on the head.

I even have some older hardware from Nvidia, Via and a few other MFG that I absolutely had to keep the disc with or it could never be used again because the WS/WU or the MFG direct DL drivers dont work.

I even remember a time when DirectX was in a shamble between versions, I cant remember which but might be between version 5-8 that you had to even go a 3rd party website to get a driver set that worked right
 
Last edited:
if the versions are the same then they're the same, but are they?

can you post a pic of the WU driver update from nVIDIA? click on details next to it it will show the version
I intend to try that, now, actually, but it wouldn't show the version after I unhid the update and checked for nw updates, so it looks like it will take a reboot or two.
 
Back
Top