the link for the Complaint generater?.... i remember seeing it in the forums some time ago.... but i just don't remember the link 
Do u know....
- Thread starter silverspear
- Start date
Okay, let's do it. Let's step back and consider the problem of Silverspear's claims in the larger picture of popular culture imagery. For the sake of review, Silverspear has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and lead people towards iniquity and sin -- all by trumping up a phony emergency. Similarly, those who believe that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance are either naive or deliberately misled. I mean, think about it. As is so often the case, if it weren't for scurrilous pop psychologists, Silverspear would have no friends. There is something grievously wrong with those anti-democratic superficial ideologues who fix blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation. Shame on the lot of them!
Yes, you heard me right; Silverspear's claim that he is the one who will lead us to our great shining future is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind. My intention here is not just to act honorably, but also to replace today's chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose.
Silverspear wants nothing less than to use both overt and covert deceptions to create division in the name of diversity, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his slaphappy put-downs. Not only have intellectually stultified wimps decided to glorify their campaigns by dressing them up as moral and righteous prerogatives, but their jeremiads are being debated as though they were actually reasonable. While some information provided by his intimates may be factual, other material is unsubstantiated rumor or amateurish press releases.
Silverspear maintains that the sky is falling. Even if this were so, Silverspear would still be avaricious. But Silverspear's attitudes are a blatantly obvious and cleverly orchestrated script, carefully concocted to make us less united, less moral, less sensitive, less engaged, and more perversely nefarious. That fact may not be pleasant, but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter. Ostensibly, he does not intend to increase society's cycle of hostility and violence, but in fact, if it were up to him, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. Silverspear wants all of us to believe that everyone and everything discriminates against him -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media.
He is not just inimical; he's grungy, too. What is often overlooked, however, is that if he can't stand the heat, he should get out of the kitchen. I have two words for Silverspear: Grow up! Currently, he lacks the clout to intensify or perpetuate neocolonialism. But one of these days, he will have enough advocates to procure explosive devices, gasoline, and detonators for use in an upcoming campaign of terror. I might be able to forgive him, but only if he promises never again to make our country spiritually blind.
If he is going to make an emotional appeal, then he should also include a rational argument. We must understand that Silverspear easily impresses his rank-and-file followers using big words like "disadvantageousness". And we must formulate that understanding into as clear and cogent a message as possible. Why is it that to deny this is to deny science, let alone the evidence of one's own powers of observation? It's because he has been known to say that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of self-centered stereotypes. That notion is so unprincipled, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. I may be opening a Pandora's box by writing this, but everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that it is not possible fully to understand the present except as a projection of the past. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche.
I don't know if I speak for anybody but myself on this, but it is indubitably not the intention of Heaven to let Silverspear impale us on the pike of alarmism. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that laws are meant to be broken, then there is certainly no hope for you. This should be a chance to examine and bring problems to light, to share and join in understanding, but the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to tell Silverspear what we all think of him -- and boy, do I have some choice words I'd like to use? He knows perfectly well that all he does is inspire hateful cop-outs. Not that I've come to expect any better from him.
Anyone with an IQ two points higher than a wet sponge's knows that with his pleas, simple credos like "check your sources" and "argue the other side of the question" have gone out the window. But, even so, he argues that he is a perpetual victim of injustice. To maintain this thesis, Silverspear naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which he does by the desperate expedient of claiming that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy. If one believes statements like, "The most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly," one is, in effect, supporting feckless mob bosses. After I shed the light of truth on the evil that is Silverspear, I know that everyone will come to the dismayed conclusion that I stated at the beginning of this discussion: We are being insidiously, conspiratorially, and treasonously led by deception, by bribery, by coercion, and by fear to create a mass psychology of fear about an imminent terrorist threat. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us.
False denials, pleas for sympathy, and a base campaign for smearing others with his own crimes constitute his whole method of defense. Sounds pretty humorless, doesn't it? But is it any more so than his homicidal Ponzi schemes? Surely, he ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person.
Some will say I exaggerate, but, actually, I'm being quite lenient. I didn't mention, for example, that Silverspear recently stated that he acts in the public interest. He said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. He said it as if he meant it. That's scary, because he has recently been going around claiming that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. The only weapons he has in his intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all he has, and he knows it. Don't let yourself be persuaded by crass dorks who secretly want to force Silverspear's moral code on the rest of us. Easy as it may seem to think outside the box, it is far more difficult to teach recalcitrant firebrands about tolerance. I feel that Silverspear has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. He obviously has none, or he wouldn't harvest what others have sown. Let us now get my message about Silverspear out to the world, because in that is our only hope for the future.
Yes, you heard me right; Silverspear's claim that he is the one who will lead us to our great shining future is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind. My intention here is not just to act honorably, but also to replace today's chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose.
Silverspear wants nothing less than to use both overt and covert deceptions to create division in the name of diversity, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his slaphappy put-downs. Not only have intellectually stultified wimps decided to glorify their campaigns by dressing them up as moral and righteous prerogatives, but their jeremiads are being debated as though they were actually reasonable. While some information provided by his intimates may be factual, other material is unsubstantiated rumor or amateurish press releases.
Silverspear maintains that the sky is falling. Even if this were so, Silverspear would still be avaricious. But Silverspear's attitudes are a blatantly obvious and cleverly orchestrated script, carefully concocted to make us less united, less moral, less sensitive, less engaged, and more perversely nefarious. That fact may not be pleasant, but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter. Ostensibly, he does not intend to increase society's cycle of hostility and violence, but in fact, if it were up to him, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. Silverspear wants all of us to believe that everyone and everything discriminates against him -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media.
He is not just inimical; he's grungy, too. What is often overlooked, however, is that if he can't stand the heat, he should get out of the kitchen. I have two words for Silverspear: Grow up! Currently, he lacks the clout to intensify or perpetuate neocolonialism. But one of these days, he will have enough advocates to procure explosive devices, gasoline, and detonators for use in an upcoming campaign of terror. I might be able to forgive him, but only if he promises never again to make our country spiritually blind.
If he is going to make an emotional appeal, then he should also include a rational argument. We must understand that Silverspear easily impresses his rank-and-file followers using big words like "disadvantageousness". And we must formulate that understanding into as clear and cogent a message as possible. Why is it that to deny this is to deny science, let alone the evidence of one's own powers of observation? It's because he has been known to say that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of self-centered stereotypes. That notion is so unprincipled, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. I may be opening a Pandora's box by writing this, but everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that it is not possible fully to understand the present except as a projection of the past. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche.
I don't know if I speak for anybody but myself on this, but it is indubitably not the intention of Heaven to let Silverspear impale us on the pike of alarmism. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that laws are meant to be broken, then there is certainly no hope for you. This should be a chance to examine and bring problems to light, to share and join in understanding, but the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to tell Silverspear what we all think of him -- and boy, do I have some choice words I'd like to use? He knows perfectly well that all he does is inspire hateful cop-outs. Not that I've come to expect any better from him.
Anyone with an IQ two points higher than a wet sponge's knows that with his pleas, simple credos like "check your sources" and "argue the other side of the question" have gone out the window. But, even so, he argues that he is a perpetual victim of injustice. To maintain this thesis, Silverspear naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which he does by the desperate expedient of claiming that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy. If one believes statements like, "The most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly," one is, in effect, supporting feckless mob bosses. After I shed the light of truth on the evil that is Silverspear, I know that everyone will come to the dismayed conclusion that I stated at the beginning of this discussion: We are being insidiously, conspiratorially, and treasonously led by deception, by bribery, by coercion, and by fear to create a mass psychology of fear about an imminent terrorist threat. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us.
False denials, pleas for sympathy, and a base campaign for smearing others with his own crimes constitute his whole method of defense. Sounds pretty humorless, doesn't it? But is it any more so than his homicidal Ponzi schemes? Surely, he ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person.
Some will say I exaggerate, but, actually, I'm being quite lenient. I didn't mention, for example, that Silverspear recently stated that he acts in the public interest. He said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. He said it as if he meant it. That's scary, because he has recently been going around claiming that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. The only weapons he has in his intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all he has, and he knows it. Don't let yourself be persuaded by crass dorks who secretly want to force Silverspear's moral code on the rest of us. Easy as it may seem to think outside the box, it is far more difficult to teach recalcitrant firebrands about tolerance. I feel that Silverspear has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. He obviously has none, or he wouldn't harvest what others have sown. Let us now get my message about Silverspear out to the world, because in that is our only hope for the future.
The purpose of this letter is to outline a plan to put inexorable pressure on Windogg to be a bit more careful about what he says and does. Some background is in order: This letter is written with the hope that readers will think for a minute about the situation at hand. Or, to express that sentiment without the emotionally charged lingo, those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still maintain that Windogg has vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom, have an obligation to do more than just observe what Windogg is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to serve on the side of Truth. We have an obligation to expose the connections between the sex-crazed problems that face us and the key issues of paternalism and hooliganism. And we have an obligation to express our concerns about his avaricious ventures. He is stepping over the line when he attempts to trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful -- way over the line. While I have no proof that no clear-thinking individual would have the temerity to propitiate slovenly ideologues for later eventualities, you should still believe me, as the main dissensus between me and Windogg is that I think that we must always be looking towards the future while keeping the past in mind. He, on the other hand, contends that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. He keeps saying that we're supposed to shut up and smile when he says misguided things. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, there are those who are informed and educated about the evils of jingoism, and there are those who are not. Windogg is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that's why his surrogates consider his remarks a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of propagandism. Windogg says it is within his legal right to acquire power and use it to indoctrinate loquacious bitter survivalists. Whether or not he indeed has such a right, I'm willing to accept that Windogg's fixation on careerism is nothing more than camouflage for a lack of original ideas. I'm even willing to accept that according to him, anyone who points this out is guilty of spreading lies, smears, and favoritism. But he maintains that either violence and prejudice are funny or that he would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform a witless act. Windogg denies any other possibility.
Might I suggest that Windogg search for a hobby? It seems he has entirely too much time on his hands, given how often he tries to undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence. My general thesis is that if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to act as a positive role model for younger people. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: I don't want to have to hear his rambling streams of consciousness. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it doubtlessly expresses how we must find the common ground that enables others to stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that every time Windogg tells his lickspittles that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question. While we may all pray for a perfect utopian world in which everyone is holding hands and singing "We Are the World" in perfect harmony, the reality is that Windogg's "I'm right and you're wrong" attitude is unprincipled, because it leaves no room for compromise. We must strengthen our roots so we can weather the storms that threaten our foundation. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to clean up the country and get it back on course again.
Windogg's holier-than-thou attitudes serve merely to illustrate that hatred, prejudice, and ignorance are still quite prevalent in our culture. It is tempting to look for simple solutions to that problem, but there are no simple solutions. I do not wish to endorse Fabianism, but rather to illustrate that Windogg's co-conspirators are hardly strangers to fetishism. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to embark on a new path towards change.
If Windogg is going to talk about higher standards, then he needs to live by those higher standards. Be that as it may, I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like him produce a new generation of sappy euphuists whose opinions and prejudices, far from being enlightened and challenged, are simply legitimized. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world.
When was the last time you heard Windogg mention that I unquestionably find his demeanor and pomposity downright apalling? Probably never. That's why today, we might have let him canonize the most contentious derelicts you'll ever see as nomological emblems of propriety. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will place a high value on honor and self-respect. Don't let him delude you into thinking that his slurs are Right with a capital R. Now that this letter is over, I pray that my logic and passion have convinced you that most pundits are uncertain about the magnitude of the threat posed by Windogg's scare tactics.
Might I suggest that Windogg search for a hobby? It seems he has entirely too much time on his hands, given how often he tries to undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence. My general thesis is that if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to act as a positive role model for younger people. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: I don't want to have to hear his rambling streams of consciousness. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it doubtlessly expresses how we must find the common ground that enables others to stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that every time Windogg tells his lickspittles that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question. While we may all pray for a perfect utopian world in which everyone is holding hands and singing "We Are the World" in perfect harmony, the reality is that Windogg's "I'm right and you're wrong" attitude is unprincipled, because it leaves no room for compromise. We must strengthen our roots so we can weather the storms that threaten our foundation. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to clean up the country and get it back on course again.
Windogg's holier-than-thou attitudes serve merely to illustrate that hatred, prejudice, and ignorance are still quite prevalent in our culture. It is tempting to look for simple solutions to that problem, but there are no simple solutions. I do not wish to endorse Fabianism, but rather to illustrate that Windogg's co-conspirators are hardly strangers to fetishism. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to embark on a new path towards change.
If Windogg is going to talk about higher standards, then he needs to live by those higher standards. Be that as it may, I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like him produce a new generation of sappy euphuists whose opinions and prejudices, far from being enlightened and challenged, are simply legitimized. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world.
When was the last time you heard Windogg mention that I unquestionably find his demeanor and pomposity downright apalling? Probably never. That's why today, we might have let him canonize the most contentious derelicts you'll ever see as nomological emblems of propriety. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will place a high value on honor and self-respect. Don't let him delude you into thinking that his slurs are Right with a capital R. Now that this letter is over, I pray that my logic and passion have convinced you that most pundits are uncertain about the magnitude of the threat posed by Windogg's scare tactics.
Y'know, taken out of context and without visiting the aforementioned link to the automatic complaint generator, this thread was possibly the scariest thing I have ever seen
Nice link tho
Nice link tho
under normal circumstances windogg, i would call you a nef, but that took way too much effort to qualify under neffing, perhaps it noffing or something like that?
He has my vote for "guy with the greatest lung capacity" if he can say all that without taking a breath. :Q
well windogg has already proclaimed himself nef king, so i guess nef president isn't that far off?
I hope everyone here realizes that Windogg and I both did NOT write these statements
They were randomly generated by the link in this thread
They were randomly generated by the link in this thread
Yea, WIndogg for prez. He had my vote from the get-go, but knowing Red, there'll be a re-count Hehehe, I couldn't resist
Hehehe, I couldn't resist TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 411
-
Facebook
Twitter