Do "role playing" Anandtech-posters need psychiatric help?

[Red Dawn]

<< However, I think it's uncalled for, and just being a jerk, to bash someone in another thread when the person hasn't even said anything in the thread worth bashing. >>

Fine, at least you are attempting to think.

BTW, the topic was about phonies so it was only logical that I bring his name up.

 

[Arschloch]

<< this thread is eakers approved. >>


Hmm, I thought you said in the "eakers approving threads is neffing" thread last night that you were done approving threads. Oh well. Guess it was wishful thinking on my part.

 

[Texmaster]

<< The fact that Tex thinks I'm not funny is about as nice a compliment that anyone could receive. >>





<< Haha.. putting Morons like Tex in his place doesn't take class, in fact it doesn't take much effort at all. It just takes the ability to state the obvious. >>




Only someone with deep anger and resentment would randomly slam people they don't even know.

Thats why people don't like you.

You dont like me because I hold you accountable when you attack someone for no reason.

I don't look for threads to slam people. Thats your way.

Hell I ever defended you a few times when people attacked you. Now I know better.

This thread is a perfect example. No one attacked you, you did it all by yourself.

That repost thread of yours is another great example. Its rare to see you ever start a thread since you don't have the guts to do it most of the time but when you did for the first time in Offtopic in months, you reposted.

People called you on it and instead of admitting to it saying "sorry" or "my bad" you decided to start ripping everyone.

Thats the difference between you can me Dawn, I'm smart enough and man enough to admit when I'm wrong. You've been on this earth almost double the time I have and you still haven't figured that out.

How sad.

 

[Arschloch]

<<

<< However, I think it's uncalled for, and just being a jerk, to bash someone in another thread when the person hasn't even said anything in the thread worth bashing. >>

Fine, at least you are attempting to think.

BTW, the topic was about phonies so it was only logical that I bring his name up. >>


I don't want to get into a war with you. I'm not taking sides.

I know you aren't the only one who has done that. It's just that I'm getting tired of seeing good threads ruined by one person calling out someone else, which turns the thread into a flamefest. I don't care if you and Tex don't get along. But two people shouldn't ruin a thread for everyone else.

 

[pyonir]

<< I'm smart enough and man enough to admit when I'm wrong >>


since when?

 

[Red Dawn]

<< Thats the difference between you can me Dawn, I'm smart enough and man enough to admit when I'm wrong. You been on this earth almost double the time I have and you still haven't figured that out.

How sad.
>>

LOL..ROTFLMAO..LOL.. See you can be funny when you try.

 

[Red Dawn]

<< I know you aren't the only one who has done that. It's just that I'm getting tired of seeing good threads ruined by one person calling out someone else, which turns the thread into a flamefest. I don't care if you and Tex don't get along. But two people shouldn't ruin a thread for everyone else. >>

Excuse me? This was a thread about what?? Slamming phonies. He get's his shots at me and I return the favor. When I log off I'm not pissed at him and I doubt he gives me a second thought. If I didn't have detractors like him I wouldn't have any material to use. We are Ying and Yang.. My Yang just happens to put his Ying to shame!

 

[Texmaster]

<<

<< I'm smart enough and man enough to admit when I'm wrong >>


since when? >>



Since forever. Here is a great example.

Link

 

[docmanhattan]

<<

<< I know you aren't the only one who has done that. It's just that I'm getting tired of seeing good threads ruined by one person calling out someone else, which turns the thread into a flamefest. I don't care if you and Tex don't get along. But two people shouldn't ruin a thread for everyone else. >>

Excuse me? This was a thread about what?? Slamming phonies. He get's his shots at me and I return the favor. When I log off I'm not pissed at him and I doubt he gives me a second thought. If I didn't have detractors like him I wouldn't have any material to use. We are Ying and Yang.. My Yang just happens to put his Ying to shame! >>

Red

Do you really want to admit that you do anything with another man's Yang?

 

[pyonir]

looks like admitting it was repost, you said you admit it when you are wrong. that is what i was questioning.

 

[Arschloch]

<< Excuse me? This was a thread about what?? Slamming phonies. He get's his shots at me and I return the favor. When I log off I'm not pissed at him and I doubt he gives me a second thought. If I didn't have detractors like him I wouldn't have any material to use. We are Ying and Yang.. My Yang just happens to put his Ying to shame! >>


Skoorb is a wise man.

The first sentence in the first post of this thread mentions that he does NOT want to name names so the thread gets locked.

You're using the argument that because this thread is about slamming phonies, then you're still on-topic when you slam someone. Well, if that's the case, then I would argue that you are NOT "on-topic" when you start naming names. If the first message of the thread determines the topic, then as soon as you start doing things that are the opposite of what that message states, then you're off-topic.

The purpose was to talk about people who impersonate others, IN GENERAL. NOT to name individuals and start a war. That's what Skoorb said. I don't think that's difficult to understand.

 

[Red Dawn]

<< Since forever. Here is a great example >>

My, your humility is heart warming. I guess I've misjudged you.. ether than or you discovered the art of Self Depreciating as a form of humor.

 

[beeezybee]

I would like to know the whole story about WW/dennilfake, but any one who tries to tell the whole story gets banned here. :|

---

Because they are rude, mean idiots like you. :|

Good bye.

AnandTech Moderator

 

[AreaCode707]

<< You dont like me because I hold you accountable when you attack someone for no reason. >>


Tex, that's part of the illusion of the internet. Over the net, you can call someone on something they said but there really isn't accountability (not counting the mods). Stating the obvious, as you and RD both claim to do, only serves to ignite a flame-fest.

 

[Texmaster]

<<

<< I know you aren't the only one who has done that. It's just that I'm getting tired of seeing good threads ruined by one person calling out someone else, which turns the thread into a flamefest. I don't care if you and Tex don't get along. But two people shouldn't ruin a thread for everyone else. >>

Excuse me? This was a thread about what?? Slamming phonies. He get's his shots at me and I return the favor. When I log off I'm not pissed at him and I doubt he gives me a second thought. If I didn't have detractors like him I wouldn't have any material to use. We are Ying and Yang.. My Yang just happens to put his Ying to shame! >>




I'll put the number of times you slam me first in threads than me doing it to you ANY day of the week.

 

[Texmaster]

<<

<< Since forever. Here is a great example >>

My, your humility is heart warming. I guess I've misjudged you.. ether than or you discovered the art of Self Depreciating as a form of humor. >>



I proved my point. Thats what I was going for.

 

[Red Dawn]

Arschloch, I wasn't really defending myself as much as I was being extremely sarcastic. I bet you are a lot of fun at Parties..NOT!




<< Do you really want to admit that you do anything with another man's Yang? >>

Of course not that would be a lie.. plus I don't see where I admitted to that??

 

[Texmaster]

<< looks like admitting it was repost, you said you admit it when you are wrong. that is what i was questioning. >>



Thats right. I was wrong and I admitted it. Thats what you questioned. I gave you the answer. Can you do the same?

 

[docmanhattan]

<< Arschloch, I wasn't really defending myself as much as I was being extremely sarcastic. I bet you are a lot of fun at Parties..NOT!




<< Do you really want to admit that you do anything with another man's Yang? >>

Of course not that would be a lie.. plus I don't see where I admitted to that?? >>

You're right. My mistake.

<< We are Ying and Yang.. My Yang just happens to put his Ying to shame! >>

You were just comparing Ying's to Yang's.

 

[Red Dawn]

<< I'll put the number of times you slam me first in threads than me doing it to you ANY day of the week. >>

Hey if you want me to stop all you have to do is ask. I didn't think it bothered you that much. In fact I thought you enjoyed it. You know a chance to learn from the Master!!

Arschloch, FYI that last sentence was sarcastic. Any time you need me to point things out like that to you just ask.


BTW Tex, this is me admitting that I was wrong. I was wrong about you being able to handle the tit for tat we do without having you whine about it. For that I'm sorry.. but not as sorry an indiovidual as you are ..Hahaha..come on, Just kidding..Or maybe not?!?!?!?

 

[Fausto]

<< I would like to know the whole story about WW/dennilfake, but any one who tries to tell the whole story gets banned here. >>


Especially when they make up two new users in one day in order to post a bunch of garbage about WW/etc.....like you. Have fun getting banned again, stupid.

 

[Arschloch]

<< Arschloch, I wasn't really defending myself as much as I was being extremely sarcastic. I bet you are a lot of fun at Parties..NOT! >>


As you probably know, sarcasm doesn't always translate very well in text.

That said, I just re-read what you wrote before, and I failed to find the sarcastic humor in the post, the Yin/Yang line notwithstanding.

 

[Texmaster]

<<

<< You dont like me because I hold you accountable when you attack someone for no reason. >>


Tex, that's part of the illusion of the internet. Over the net, you can call someone on something they said but there really isn't accountability (not counting the mods). Stating the obvious, as you and RD both claim to do, only serves to ignite a flame-fest. >>



I simply gave the reason why he doesn't like me. I never said I was stating the obvious either.

If you are talking about true accountability you are correct.

 

[Czar]

Red Dawn,
remember this


<< I don't want to name any names and have the thread locked for beating on a dead horse. >>

 

[Geekbabe]

Lol, teach me to log off to go to the bank, look at all the fun I missed


At any rate, I've reloaded on popcorn if anybody would like some while enjoying the best show in town