Originally posted by: DTess17
I did. It is a consideration, but I did have some pretty horrid experiences with Gigabyte back in the 478 days.
I've had great luck with Asus and was looking at them, but they have so many different boards it's hard to make heads to tails of what features each one has.
I think i might try crossfire, or use some type of AMD/ATI card. I've been on using nvidia since for the last three or four cards I've bought.
Originally posted by: conlan
Originally posted by: DTess17
I did. It is a consideration, but I did have some pretty horrid experiences with Gigabyte back in the 478 days.
I've had great luck with Asus and was looking at them, but they have so many different boards it's hard to make heads to tails of what features each one has.
I think i might try crossfire, or use some type of AMD/ATI card. I've been on using nvidia since for the last three or four cards I've bought.
I understand your reluctance considering your past experience, however, Gigabyte has improved greatly in recent years and the UD3P/R boards are awesome.
I too have usually had good luck w/ Asus, but for the P45s the UD3P/R is the way to go IMHO.
Originally posted by: DTess17
Originally posted by: conlan
Originally posted by: DTess17
I did. It is a consideration, but I did have some pretty horrid experiences with Gigabyte back in the 478 days.
I've had great luck with Asus and was looking at them, but they have so many different boards it's hard to make heads to tails of what features each one has.
I think i might try crossfire, or use some type of AMD/ATI card. I've been on using nvidia since for the last three or four cards I've bought.
I understand your reluctance considering your past experience, however, Gigabyte has improved greatly in recent years and the UD3P/R boards are awesome.
I too have usually had good luck w/ Asus, but for the P45s the UD3P/R is the way to go IMHO.
I guess I should stop holding on to the grudge I have against them. I built three systems all based on Gigabyte, and all three died. It was a mobo problem they had with that spin I guess. I switched to Abit, then Asus and have never looked back.
They are getting pretty glowing reviews now. I might have to suck it up and try it out. Price seems pretty good too.
Originally posted by: akash2008
I did have some pretty horrid experiences with Gigabyte back in the 478 days.
Originally posted by: DTess17
I've decided to give Gigabyte another try. Hopefully it works out well this time.
I would say yes the P45 OCs better than the X38 if you subscribe to the general belief that a smaller process generates less heat and clocks better than a larger process. P45 is 65nm, X38 and P35 are 90nm. I believe X48 was also 90nm at launch, but not sure if they shrunk it down or not.Originally posted by: DTess17
Do the p45 boards overall OC better than the x38 boards?
Also does running 4 slots impact the OC in the same way it does x38?
Originally posted by: jzodda
Originally posted by: DTess17
I've decided to give Gigabyte another try. Hopefully it works out well this time.
You won't regret it. This is one of the best boards I have ever run. Had it running at 600 FSB at unsafe voltages. Even my 24/7 settings are great (see sig)
Use the huge thread on this board at X-treme for any help with overclocking. All info is there among the 1800 posts.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/f...howthread.php?t=205132
Originally posted by: maluckey
EP45-UD3P with Q9400 and HyperX- T1 PC 8500 here. Love it. the biggest drawback is that it OC's so damned easily............
475 x 7.5x with a Q9400 core is simple. Set it and bump the VCore to around 1.2 volts +/-. That was all that I did. It's a big letdown that there wasn't ANY drama. I just set the RAM to a speed closest to stock (which stock is 1066) and didn't even raise VCore higher than 2.08 volts!! It still held 5-5-5-15 with the drive strength set to 1066 profile.
Boring...and fast.
Mark