Buying quiet 7200 RPM IDE drive(s) soon and was thinking....
If I purchased 2 20 gig drives instead of one, would overall system performance increase because the data is staying closer to the center of the platters (assuming it is split between the two rather than filling up one entire one)?
I typically have OS/Apps/Games/Pics partitions on a single drive. If I could split 'em so that the OS and Apps is on one drive and the Games/Pics partitions reside on the other drive...I may get better seek times.
Now, if I decide on getting an additional controller card, I could put the CD/CDRW/HDD's on their own channels (no slaves is a good thing, right?).
Now, if'n I decide on multiple HDD's, the statistical probability of having a failure is doubled methinks...(long time since stats class). That would be a definite down-side.
Just throwing some ideas around with my morning java.
-Wandere
If I purchased 2 20 gig drives instead of one, would overall system performance increase because the data is staying closer to the center of the platters (assuming it is split between the two rather than filling up one entire one)?
I typically have OS/Apps/Games/Pics partitions on a single drive. If I could split 'em so that the OS and Apps is on one drive and the Games/Pics partitions reside on the other drive...I may get better seek times.
Now, if I decide on getting an additional controller card, I could put the CD/CDRW/HDD's on their own channels (no slaves is a good thing, right?).
Now, if'n I decide on multiple HDD's, the statistical probability of having a failure is doubled methinks...(long time since stats class). That would be a definite down-side.
Just throwing some ideas around with my morning java.
-Wandere
