681, 1441, I find it hard to read these sort of things. Who's job was it to interpret that conditions were not being met? And who's job was it to decide what the actions (supposedly spelled out) to take? For the war to be legal on these grounds, it seems that the job should have belonged to the US...Originally posted by: charrison
Actually you are incorrect. 681 was a ceasefire depending on conditions being meet. Those condition were not meet. 1441 promised severe consequences if conditions were not meet. Neither one of the resolutions and about 10 other resolutions were not meet. Therefore the ceasefire could easily be canceled.Originally posted by: Vaerilis
But the UN didn't give the USA the right to attack in any resolution.