My sentence was fine, you just couldn't wait to Bleeding Heart/White Guilt/DamnTheMan! so you jumped the gun and ASSumed...sorry you were wrong, but you were - and are.
Nope, you're not particularly good at writing sentences. This is something usually rooted in poor education.
I realize you've lost this debate and need to create a strawman to try and "win", so congrats, you've - sort of - "won" your strawman argument. Unfortunately for your "win", and for the long term welfare of our country, anyone with a brain (even one that needs to be trained to pick up paper) can understand that we're going to have to Amensty all the Illegal Invaders that are already here. I'm sure you just came in your pants, or panties, whichever you wear, envisioning that. So see? We can agree on something!
lol. Your posts are so consistently awful it's actually impressive.
Oh, I think I'm well within the bounds of "rightness" here on my estimate. If you asked every American if they'd rather:
1.) Just have Open Boarders and let Everyone that could get here in (I'm sure your stance), to turn the US long term into an overcrowded shithole.
2.) Just keep doing the charade we're doing, exploiting the illegals and letting the business owners effectively be modern day slave owners...along with F'ing over our legal citizens and those properly waiting in line (who are in just as bad - or worse - places than those streaming across our souther border).
3.) A new meaningless smokescreen solution that will not work and just in the end keep letting in high hundreds of thousands/Millions of people who don't belong her, basically #2, but with a new smokescreen remix.
4.) Bring home our military from ourseas, use them to lock down the southern border tight, with lethal force, and then Amnesty the illegals that are here.
I have very high confidence there'd be 10's of Millions that would be signing up for Option 4. Granted, there'd be a lot of you that wanted Option 1, however, given Option 1, you're the extreme Left: Even the moderates in your party laugh about you (not in your company/publically of course, they need you zealots for your guaranteed votes).
Nah sorry, most Americans would still not want the border to kill immigrants crossing the border illegally for work. You can always take a poll if you like. Hell, start with this board, I'm sure we all need a good laugh.
Bump it all you want. I don't need to explain it: It's the F'ing BORDER, It Exists For A Reason.
Explain why the border exists. Try not to wimp out on details.
And, please stop sensationalizing: It's not murder, it's killing. The people illegally crossing would decide they want to be killed rather than coming into the US legally.
What U.S. law allows border agents to kill immigrants looking for work that decide to cross illegally? Again, try not to wimp out on details.
If caught and not able to be detained or forced back with a known degree of confidence they're back to their side, they'd be killed. They don't need to be suicide bombers, come here to maim or kill, whatever. They're simply choosing to cross a militarized border. If they don't want to be killed, don't cross it, do this thing we have here called: Coming to the US legally. I tried to make that as simple as I could for you. Did you follow it, or did I 'wimp out'? Let me guess: I didn't change my mind and chant, Open Borders For All!!! Open Borders For All!!! F*ck Whitey!!! F*ck Whitey!!! If We Don't Have Open Borders We're Racist Xenophobes!!!, so I 'wimp'd out', amirite?
Yeah you wimped out again. Like I said, you couldn't explain if your life depended on it why the U.S. would decide to militarize the border to such a degree that it would suddenly become legal to kill foreign national immigrants looking for work simply because they crossed a border illegally. You'll have to nut up and explain why this murder (and it is indeed murder) is necessary to solve an illegal immigrant problem that essentially amounts to them crowding schools taking more gov't money than you like, and supposedly depressing wages, the later of which is not verifiable and empirically proven. Because those are about the worse negatives you can come up with, and sorry, Americans don't feel killing immigrants for making the mistake of crossing a border requires sniper fire.
Don't care if it's illegal under international law. I could care less what any other country thinks of our illegal invasion problem. Don't give even 1/10th of a moldy f*ck.
lmao, you just said to "look at every other country" as evidence for how we should handle our immigration problem. So man up and stop pussying out of listing which countries.
If Mexico, who'd have the largest problem with it, has a problem with it, then they can keep their people from crossing over our border. Since in Reality they do just about everything they can to encourage their folks to cross over our border (it gets population out of their country, and US $$$$ back into theirs), why would you ever, and I mean ever, bring up what Mexico, or any other country, thinks about our immigration policy??? Haha, Total Delusion. Perhaps this is where you've gone seriously wrong mentally (I'm assuming you're a US citizen btw): You actually care what Mexicans, Mexico as a country, and any other country in the world thinks about our border control policy with Mexico? Really?
Huh? Nowhere did I say I care what other countries, including Mexico, do to handle their immigration issues. Read carefully. I very specifically said it's illegal under international law, as it's not really particularly difficult to see why we should care if, for example, an American crosses the border of another country (say, Germany) and is murdered in the streets because they unknowingly passed illegally. It's why no one but a few knuckle draggers like yourself would suggest such an inane plan to deal with our immigration problem.
Irrellevant strawman, but I answered it above for you since you seem to think it's important.
Chuck
Another wimp out. Don't worry, I'll keep bumping. Wished I had bumped this sooner!
Facebook
Twitter