Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: wvtalbot
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: wvtalbot
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: vshah
Both schools use the 4.0 system, but at one school a 3.8 is 80-85%, whereas at the other it's a 3.7
Wtf kind of grading system is that? At my school an 80-83 would get you a 2.67, 85 would get you a 3.0.
So you'd need a 95 for a 4.0?
It looks like your grading system is the one that is a little whacky.
At Umass it's A 4.0, A- 3.7, B+ 3.3, B 3.0 and I'm sure you can figure the rest out

Unless the school you're from/applying to has some really scewy system, I don't see why they wouldn't take the GPA as is, unless the school itself sucked.
And you numerical grades would not require you to get a 95 for an A, and an 85 for a B, correct? Which was my point.
At every University the board of governor can change the grading system if they feel its appropriate, there is no standard.
There may be no official standard, but typically a 90 is a 4.0, 80 is a 3.0, 70 is a 2.0, etc.
Typically? Have many Universities have you seen this at? Yours? Seriously it changes all the time depending on where you are.
:roll:
Fine, at almost all of my friends' colleges, it's based off of exactly what I said. Which is about 40 or so unique colleges. Not to mention the other colleges I looked at before going to UMD.
You're playing semantics over the 4.0 scale. Ask anyone off the street what number typically represents an A, or a 4.0, and you'll get the majority of responses to be a 90.