Do freedom and access obligate and/or imply blather?

nomatic

Member
Sep 9, 2002
39
0
0
Do freedom of speech and easy access to the internet somehow obligate retards to blather on? Most posters on anandtech aren't even capable of grade school grammar, let alone formulating coherent thoughts and translating them into cogent arguments. If not, why, then, do these affected twits pile their vomit and scatological remainders on topics that require nuanced thought that they are clearly incapable of mustering as things stand, e.g. politics?
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: nomatic
Do freedom of speech and easy access to the internet somehow obligate retards to blather on? Most posters on anandtech aren't even capable of grade school grammar, let alone formulating coherent thoughts and translating them into cogent arguments. If not, why, then, do these affected twits pile their vomit and scatological remainders on topics that require nuanced thought that they are clearly incapable of mustering as things stand, e.g. politics?

And you think you're somehow any different, or better?

Read your post, and then look in the mirror. :)
 

WalMart1564

Banned
Jan 22, 2003
601
0
0
wow sounds like you gragidaded from cooladge

when i respond on here i dont really put much thought into it and if i spell somthing wrong i let it go
and as far as grammar ? who cares ?
i dont

when i ask a question ill take the answer in whatever form the person kind enough to provide the answer is inclined to provide it


last i checked a Phd wasnt required to be a member
 

nomatic

Member
Sep 9, 2002
39
0
0
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: nomatic
Do freedom of speech and easy access to the internet somehow obligate retards to blather on? Most posters on anandtech aren't even capable of grade school grammar, let alone formulating coherent thoughts and translating them into cogent arguments. If not, why, then, do these affected twits pile their vomit and scatological remainders on topics that require nuanced thought that they are clearly incapable of mustering as things stand, e.g. politics?

And you think you're somehow any different, or better?

Read your post, and then look in the mirror. :)

When I choose to post, I do so on topics I am well informed in. I exercise restraint in the ones I am less versed in.
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
Originally posted by: nomatic
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: nomatic
Do freedom of speech and easy access to the internet somehow obligate retards to blather on? Most posters on anandtech aren't even capable of grade school grammar, let alone formulating coherent thoughts and translating them into cogent arguments. If not, why, then, do these affected twits pile their vomit and scatological remainders on topics that require nuanced thought that they are clearly incapable of mustering as things stand, e.g. politics?

And you think you're somehow any different, or better?

Read your post, and then look in the mirror. :)

When I choose to post, I do so on topics I am well informed in. I exercise restraint in the ones I am less versed in.

That is why you only have 30 posts.
 

nomatic

Member
Sep 9, 2002
39
0
0
Originally posted by: WalMart1564
wow sounds like you gragidaded from cooladge

when i respond on here i dont really put much thought into it and if i spell somthing wrong i let it go
and as far as grammar ? who cares ?
i dont

when i ask a question ill take the answer in whatever form the person kind enough to provide the answer is inclined to provide it


last i checked a Phd wasnt required to be a member

Composing thoughtful and measured arguments has nothing to do with one's education level, beyond the mastery of certain basic elements. Why do you not put much thought into your responses? Are you that narcissistic?
 

nomatic

Member
Sep 9, 2002
39
0
0
Originally posted by: Zakath15
Originally posted by: nomatic
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: nomatic
Do freedom of speech and easy access to the internet somehow obligate retards to blather on? Most posters on anandtech aren't even capable of grade school grammar, let alone formulating coherent thoughts and translating them into cogent arguments. If not, why, then, do these affected twits pile their vomit and scatological remainders on topics that require nuanced thought that they are clearly incapable of mustering as things stand, e.g. politics?

And you think you're somehow any different, or better?

Read your post, and then look in the mirror. :)

When I choose to post, I do so on topics I am well informed in. I exercise restraint in the ones I am less versed in.

That is why you only have 30 posts.

Do you think it's a hallmark of pride that you've posted nearly ten thousand mindless excrements? Twit.

 

thirtythree

Diamond Member
Aug 7, 2001
8,680
3
0
Originally posted by: nomatic
Originally posted by: Zakath15
Originally posted by: nomatic
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: nomatic
Do freedom of speech and easy access to the internet somehow obligate retards to blather on? Most posters on anandtech aren't even capable of grade school grammar, let alone formulating coherent thoughts and translating them into cogent arguments. If not, why, then, do these affected twits pile their vomit and scatological remainders on topics that require nuanced thought that they are clearly incapable of mustering as things stand, e.g. politics?

And you think you're somehow any different, or better?

Read your post, and then look in the mirror. :)

When I choose to post, I do so on topics I am well informed in. I exercise restraint in the ones I am less versed in.

That is why you only have 30 posts.

Do you think it's a hallmark of pride that you've posted nearly ten thousand mindless excrements? Twit.
I don't see how thirty mindless excrements is any better.
 

nomatic

Member
Sep 9, 2002
39
0
0
Originally posted by: Deslocke
Originally posted by: nomatic
Originally posted by: Zakath15
Originally posted by: nomatic
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: nomatic
Do freedom of speech and easy access to the internet somehow obligate retards to blather on? Most posters on anandtech aren't even capable of grade school grammar, let alone formulating coherent thoughts and translating them into cogent arguments. If not, why, then, do these affected twits pile their vomit and scatological remainders on topics that require nuanced thought that they are clearly incapable of mustering as things stand, e.g. politics?

And you think you're somehow any different, or better?

Read your post, and then look in the mirror. :)

When I choose to post, I do so on topics I am well informed in. I exercise restraint in the ones I am less versed in.

That is why you only have 30 posts.

Do you think it's a hallmark of pride that you've posted nearly ten thousand mindless excrements? Twit.
I don't see how thirty mindless excrements is any better.

Somehow, you seem to think that my original question is rhetorical. It is not. As for your question, it stinks a whole lot less.

 

WalMart1564

Banned
Jan 22, 2003
601
0
0
Composing thoughtful and measured arguments has nothing to do with one's education level, beyond the mastery of certain basic elements. Why do you not put much thought into your responses? Are you that narcissistic?



WHAT ? think you can break that down in terms us *twits* can understand ?
ill bet its not very nice tho
 

nomatic

Member
Sep 9, 2002
39
0
0
WHAT ? think you can break that down in terms us *twits* can understand ?
ill bet its not very nice tho


Which part don't you understand? It's not as though I'm talking about difficult-to-grasp concepts.
 

thirtythree

Diamond Member
Aug 7, 2001
8,680
3
0
Originally posted by: WalMart1564
Composing thoughtful and measured arguments has nothing to do with one's education level, beyond the mastery of certain basic elements. Why do you not put much thought into your responses? Are you that narcissistic?



WHAT ? think you can break that down in terms us *twits* can understand ?
ill bet its not very nice tho
I don't understand his response to me either. I didn't even ask a question .. I guess we will never be able to comprehend his level of intellect.
 

WalMart1564

Banned
Jan 22, 2003
601
0
0
Originally posted by: nomatic
WHAT ? think you can break that down in terms us *twits* can understand ?
ill bet its not very nice tho


Which part don't you understand? It's not as though I'm talking about difficult-to-grasp concepts.


ok im guilty im not as smart as you man
but lets be honest you sound like a gay englis prof.
 

nomatic

Member
Sep 9, 2002
39
0
0
Originally posted by: WalMart1564
Originally posted by: nomatic
WHAT ? think you can break that down in terms us *twits* can understand ?
ill bet its not very nice tho


Which part don't you understand? It's not as though I'm talking about difficult-to-grasp concepts.


ok im guilty im not as smart as you man
but lets be honest you sound like a gay englis prof.


A few things:

-Intelligence isn't the issue at hand. Restraint is. I hope you see the difference.

-I don't consider myself to be smarter than the next person. Unless that next person happens to be a libertarian.
 

WalMart1564

Banned
Jan 22, 2003
601
0
0
well thank god im not a libertarian
but based on all your speach yes you do think you smarter than the next person

If not, why, then, do these affected twits pile their vomit and scatological remainders on topics that require nuanced thought that they are clearly incapable of mustering as things stand, e.g. politics?

see how superior you sound i could never construct such a sentance
i think ill just wake my wife up slap her around then storm out of my trailer have a beer have a nice fart then get on the internet
i think this is how you see others like o say me

so yes you do think your smarter and hell you may be right but your online at 430 am complaing like a B*tch about the quality of the grammar ?
how lame is that
 

WalMart1564

Banned
Jan 22, 2003
601
0
0
I don't understand his response to me either. I didn't even ask a question .. I guess we will never be able to comprehend his level of intellect.

see im not the only person here that isnt as smart as the professor
 

nomatic

Member
Sep 9, 2002
39
0
0
Originally posted by: WalMart1564
well thank god im not a libertarian
but based on all your speach yes you do think you smarter than the next person

If not, why, then, do these affected twits pile their vomit and scatological remainders on topics that require nuanced thought that they are clearly incapable of mustering as things stand, e.g. politics?

see how superior you sound i could never construct such a sentance
i think ill just wake my wife up slap her around then storm out of my trailer have a beer have a nice fart then get on the internet
i think this is how you see others like o say me

so yes you do think your smarter and hell you may be right but your online at 430 am complaing like a B*tch about the quality of the grammar ?
how lame is that

The word is bitch. Self-censoring is lame and inefficient. I'll say it again: where a person lives and how he chooses to pass gas is utterly unrelated to constructing thoughtful posts. As for my superiority, you forgot to read the words "as things stand." It has nothing to do with native intelligence, and everything to do with being informed. I've met many thoughtful people across all educational and socioeconomic levels, including the stereotypical 'redneck' you describe. Sorry to hear about your tendencies toward domestic violence, though.

 

WalMart1564

Banned
Jan 22, 2003
601
0
0
well i am a redneck hehe
i dont realllly beat the old lady just making a point one that you got BTW
you know i kinda like you man your just kinda anal about english thats kool

you made a point had an opinion then stuck to it good job
is there anything else you want to chat about

war ?
oil ?
bush ?

i assume your a Republican ?