Per the specs on my Gigabyte GTX 970 G1, the boost is supposed to be to 1329 but mine boosts to 1392 (stock - no manual OCing.) Per RivaTuner/MSI Afterburner, my card stays at 1392 stock throughout while gaming (it also shows my base core speed is 1177 which is basically the same as the published 1178 for the card.)
At first I thought the published 1329 was a typo - thinking the actual 1392 boost I am seeing was transposed incorrectly as 1329 on specification sheets, but the multiple (boost #/base #) of the 1178 base to 1329 boost is roughly the same as the boost multiple on other 970 models.
Also searching for Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 and 1392, I found some other people posting theirs where boosting to 1392.
Again if you divided boost by core speed, all GTX 970s are reporting around 12.8% increase over stock during boost (for example, the G1s 1329 boost /1178 base) , but mine and others' G1 is actually doing 18.2%
Fluke or are all GTX 970s boosting higher than stated they will?
Anyone else with a G1 confirm if yours boosts to 1392 (versus 1329) at stock?
At first I thought the published 1329 was a typo - thinking the actual 1392 boost I am seeing was transposed incorrectly as 1329 on specification sheets, but the multiple (boost #/base #) of the 1178 base to 1329 boost is roughly the same as the boost multiple on other 970 models.
Also searching for Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 and 1392, I found some other people posting theirs where boosting to 1392.
Again if you divided boost by core speed, all GTX 970s are reporting around 12.8% increase over stock during boost (for example, the G1s 1329 boost /1178 base) , but mine and others' G1 is actually doing 18.2%
Fluke or are all GTX 970s boosting higher than stated they will?
Anyone else with a G1 confirm if yours boosts to 1392 (versus 1329) at stock?
Last edited:
