• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Disk revisions in RAID. Looking to expand array

smakme7757

Golden Member
I'm currently running 4x WD1003FBYX
I'm looking at picking up two more, but they seem to be replaced by WD1003FBYZ

I'm currently running the 4 drives in RAID 0 as a test lab, but am starting to get more and more data on there which is actually worth a bit of time to me (Backups are done with VEEAM). So I've decided to buy two more disks and run them in RAID 10 (or a 3 way Mirror in Windows Storage Spaces).

The only difference between the models seems to be the interface 6Gbps/3Gbps

Any reason not to use the newer drives with the older drives or would everything be A-OK 🙂.

Thanks people.
 
I found even minor revisions in velicoraptors gave me performance problems with my WD raid 0 array. It might work out or it might significantly drop performance, all depends how close the drives really are to each other.

Its not possible to even answer before you buy either. I would go about asking Western digital, they typically have great support when it comes to RAID and they will know if its a good idea or not to raid this combination of disks.
 
This has more to do with your controller(if you're using a hardware RAID solution) than the drive. For home use, software RAID isn't going to care...in my experience at least.
 
If you're using a decent RAID controller or software RAID / drive pooling you won't have any problems mixing the X and the Z. The WD specs are almost identical, the firmware is different and possibly the small block random IOs.

But going from 4x 1TB RAID 0 to 6x 1TB 3-way mirror MS storage space sounds extreme. A 3-way mirrored storage space of 6 drives is not such a good idea. You get increased resiliency but cut the usable capacity to 1/3 of the raw capacity. What kind of availability are you planning for with this setup? A 3-way mirror would become more relevant once you hit 12+ drives in a pool.

For your 6 drives a 2-way mirror or a RAID 10 would be more appropriate.
 
If you're using a decent RAID controller or software RAID / drive pooling you won't have any problems mixing the X and the Z. The WD specs are almost identical, the firmware is different and possibly the small block random IOs.

But going from 4x 1TB RAID 0 to 6x 1TB 3-way mirror MS storage space sounds extreme. A 3-way mirrored storage space of 6 drives is not such a good idea. You get increased resiliency but cut the usable capacity to 1/3 of the raw capacity. What kind of availability are you planning for with this setup? A 3-way mirror would become more relevant once you hit 12+ drives in a pool.

For your 6 drives a 2-way mirror or a RAID 10 would be more appropriate.
I actually meant RAID10.

The loss in capacity isn't a problem, I'd just like the two extra spindles for some more breathing space for my VM's.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top