- Dec 6, 2003
- 3,564
- 8
- 81
I'm looking to get rid of my Charter cable and am considering satellite for my TV. Am looking for opinions/pros/cons for these two. Thanks
This comes up a lot but usually it comes down to this:
If you watch a lot of sports, want a bit more HD channels and only plan on hooking one tv up to it unless you want to be charged a lot more then get dish.
If you want about the same as DirectTV but a bit cheaper but less sports or HD and a duel dvr that lets you use it on two tv's without a ton of extra charges go for dish.
This comes up a lot but usually it comes down to this:
If you watch a lot of sports, want a bit more HD channels and only plan on hooking one tv up to it unless you want to be charged a lot more then get dish.
If you want about the same as DirectTV but a bit cheaper but less sports or HD and a duel dvr that lets you use it on two tv's without a ton of extra charges go for dish.
So, it's Dish either way, right?
He meant "get DirectTV" for the first one. Pretty accurate and succinct analysis, though.
I had directTV for a while. The thing thats nice about dish is the "free HD" although the HD quality seemed...not as good as most of Direct's stuff. HD on direct is $10 extra a month, DVR is another $10 a month, extra SD boxes cost $5 a month.
You get raped ultimately.
Not to mention you have to pay I believe a extra $13 a month to simply use basic dvr functions, fast forward / pause and such or even to access your recorded shows on your dvr, on any other tv's other then your main for directTV.
You really believe that you have to lease the equipment for 5 bucks a month but can't use it unless you pay another 13 bucks a month? As for watching recorded shows on other tv's, that's called Whole Home DVR and it means that you only have to lease one DVR for your whole house. It's well worth the 13 bucks for people who have 4 or 5 boxes all over the house. Saves them 400 or 500 bucks in the beginning.
Oh, you can use it but all you can do with it is watch live tv with it so it makes the dvr useless on other tv's unless you pay extra.
You still have to pay extra for each receiver each month for directTV and while it can be worth it if you plan on getting a ton of tv's for it hooked up the dish dual dvr makes one wonder why direct tv can't come out with something similar as most places won't need more then that.
You're completely ass backward. I just left Dish because I went from two tvs to four tvs and it was much, much cheaper (monthly DVR and Receiver charges) to go with DirecTV, including 2 HD DVR receivers and the Whole Home DVR.
Money better spent on a faster internet connection.
Pay TV is fast becoming obsolete.
Oh, you can use it but all you can do with it is watch live tv with it so it makes the dvr useless on other tv's unless you pay extra.
You still have to pay extra for each receiver each month for directTV and while it can be worth it if you plan on getting a ton of tv's for it hooked up the dish dual dvr makes one wonder why direct tv can't come out with something similar as most places won't need more then that.
they both blow.I am leaving directv as soon as my contract is up.Weather conditions affect their signal strength no matter what anyone tells you . I have the most recent dish,mounted on a pole pointed toward the southern sky unobstructed,still get freeze ups or loss(like yesterday).Also as mentioned they will nickle and dime you to death.I pay $110 per and do not get hbo,ect.UVerse here I come.
Absolute bullshit. If you have Whole Home DVR you can watch your recorded channels on every tv in the house without paying any more money other than the fee for Whole Home DVR.
It's ok to be a fanboy, but at least get your facts straight.
Not true, you have to pay for the whole home and the extra receiver cost and I can see the cost on a friends statement.
Both are the extra fee's as are listed on their website so not sure why you seem to be such a fanboy of directTV saying they don't charge you extra for it.