Disaster used as political payoff

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/343813p-293471c.html
Already under fire for its woeful response to Hurricane Katrina, the federal disaster agency appears to have turned hurricane relief donations into a political payoff - until it was challenged.

All last week, FEMA bureaucrats gave prominent placement on the agency's Web site to Operation Blessing, the Virginia-based charity run by controversial right-wing evangelist and Christian Coalition founder Pat Robertson.

For anyone wishing to donate only cash, the agency's site listed the names and phone numbers of three groups: the Red Cross, Operation Blessing and America's Second Harvest, a national coalition of food banks.

That first list was followed by a second, longer list of several dozen religious and nonsectarian charities. This second list was for anyone who wanted to give either cash or noncash gifts.

Just as in an ordinary election, however, top ballot position makes it far more likely you'll get noticed and chosen.

The same FEMA list was then disseminated by state and local governments throughout the country. Both Gov. Pataki and Mayor Bloomberg, for example, placed the same top three FEMA charities on their Hurricane Katrina press releases and Web sites last week.

Those familiar with Robertson and his charity were flabbergasted.

Operation Blessing, with a budget of $190 million, is an integral part of the Robertson empire. Not only is he the chairman of the board, his wife is listed on its latest financial report as its vice president, and one of his sons is on the board of directors.

Back in 1994, during the infamous Rwandan genocide, Robertson used his 700 Club's daily cable operation to appeal to the American public for donations to fly humanitarian supplies into Zaire to save the Rwandan refugees.

The planes purchased by Operation Blessing did a lot more than ferry relief supplies.

An investigation conducted by the Virginia attorney general's office concluded in 1999 that the planes were mostly used to transport mining equipment for a diamond operation run by a for-profit company called African Development Corp.

And who do you think was the principal executive and sole shareholder of the mining company?

You guessed it, Pat Robertson himself.

Robertson had landed the mining concession from his longtime friend Mobutu Sese Seko, then the dictator of Zaire.

Investigators concluded that Operation Blessing "willfully induced contributions from the public through the use of misleading statements ..."

After the investigation began, Robertson placated state regulators by personally reimbursing his own charity $400,000 and by agreeing to tighten its bookkeeping methods.


Separating Operation Blessing from Robertson's many politically oriented endeavors is not that easy, however.

The biggest single U.S. recipient of the charity's largess, according to its latest financial report, was Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network. It received $885,000 in the fiscal year ended March 2004.

Robertson uses that Christian network for some markedly unchristian purposes.

A few years back, he repeatedly defended Charles Taylor, the former brutal dictator of Liberia who is under indictment by a UN tribunal for war crimes.

As with Mobutu in the Congo, Robertson had a personal stake in the matter: He had millions invested in a Liberian gold mine, thanks to Taylor, according to press reports.

Recently, Robertson called for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. Those who know Robertson's record raised such an uproar that on Sunday FEMA suddenly rearranged its entire Web site for hurricane donations.

Gone was Operation Blessing's name and choice location. Replacing it was an alphabetical list of nearly 50 national relief organizations.

At FEMA, they take a while to get things right.
Beautiful.

You'd think someone in the government would know about Robertson's "charity" organization and keep it from being listed. That faux Christian is rich enough. Then again, donate enough money to campaigns....
 

Orsorum

Lifer
Dec 26, 2001
27,631
5
81
I think it's time for an inquiry by the IRS into Mr. Robertson's tax-exempt status.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
How about an inquiry in to Mr. Jesse Jackson's tax-exempt status?
How about keeping the trolling and diversion out of this thread?
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,780
46,595
136
All charities should be under closer government scrutiny then they currently are, particularly when disasters like this hit and the money is flowing into them.

But since both sides have their respective dirty laundry on this issue I don't see that happening.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Seriously consider getting a life.

This is all you have to worry about? Who got front page ad space on a website?
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: K1052
All charities should be under closer government scrutiny then they currently are, particularly when disasters like this hit and the money is flowing into them.

But since both sides have their respective dirty laundry on this issue I don't see that happening.
Esp. in the age of faith-based disaster relief efforts.
 

FuzzyBee

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2000
5,172
1
81
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: K1052
All charities should be under closer government scrutiny then they currently are, particularly when disasters like this hit and the money is flowing into them.

But since both sides have their respective dirty laundry on this issue I don't see that happening.
Esp. in the age of faith-based disaster relief efforts.

Would you have felt better if the Salvation Army had replaced them?
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,780
46,595
136
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: K1052
All charities should be under closer government scrutiny then they currently are, particularly when disasters like this hit and the money is flowing into them.

But since both sides have their respective dirty laundry on this issue I don't see that happening.
Esp. in the age of faith-based disaster relief efforts.

There are good apples and bad apples in the same barrel.

Robertson is a televangelist, I don't think many would be all that shocked if he was indeed crooked.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: K1052
All charities should be under closer government scrutiny then they currently are, particularly when disasters like this hit and the money is flowing into them.

But since both sides have their respective dirty laundry on this issue I don't see that happening.
Esp. in the age of faith-based disaster relief efforts.
There are good apples and bad apples in the same barrel.

Robertson is a televangelist, I don't think many would be all that shocked if he was indeed crooked.
Well, he's already been proven to be corrupt. And, I'd have been just as critical if some charity run by Jesse Jackson was getting top billing.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,780
46,595
136
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: K1052
All charities should be under closer government scrutiny then they currently are, particularly when disasters like this hit and the money is flowing into them.

But since both sides have their respective dirty laundry on this issue I don't see that happening.
Esp. in the age of faith-based disaster relief efforts.
There are good apples and bad apples in the same barrel.

Robertson is a televangelist, I don't think many would be all that shocked if he was indeed crooked.
Well, he's already been proven to be corrupt. And, I'd have been just as critical if some charity run by Jesse Jackson was getting top billing.

Two out of three ain't bad. :p

But seriously, was a mistake to do so but they did correct it.
Most of the talk I have heard about giving money coming from the government has been about the Red Cross.

 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Yeah...and the Red Cross did an admirable job for the tsunami victims. I'm sure they'll do the same now despite their own initial delay in getting food/water to those trapped in the city. They're working across the country now, it seems, helping shelters and temporary housing all over the place (even here where several hundred victims are due to arrive today.)
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Pabster
How about an inquiry in to Mr. Jesse Jackson's tax-exempt status?

I agree with you, but that's completely irrelevant to this thread, which I feel is based on a completely legitimate topic that's worthy of discussion.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
I agree with you, but that's completely irrelevant to this thread, which I feel is based on a completely legitimate topic that's worthy of discussion.

I'm sorry, but I don't find ad placement on a website to be a worthy topic of discussion.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Pabster

I'm sorry, but I don't find ad placement on a website to be a worthy topic of discussion.

Then why did you post in this thread in the first place? How is Jesse Jackson relevant here?
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Then why did you post in this thread in the first place? How is Jesse Jackson relevant here?

Relative to Pat Robertson.

Both "ministers" using their tax-exempt statuses for illicit purposes.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Pabster

Relative to Pat Robertson.

Both "ministers" using their tax-exempt statuses for illicit purposes.

That's still a complete non sequitur that has nothing whatsoever to do with the topic at hand, and it doesn't explain why you posted here if you regard this thread as unworthy of discussion.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
That's still a complete non sequitur that has nothing whatsoever to do with the topic at hand, and it doesn't explain why you posted here if you regard this thread as unworthy of discussion.

Save your latin for church.

And since when did DonVito decide who should post and where?