If you use backup software that has built-in dissimilar hardware capability, you can even run a pretty-good recovery test inside a Virtual Server window. Hey, at least you know you can always recover your Server to a laptop if necessary!
Originally posted by: rasczak
i have heard stories about windows backup, is it reliable? i have symantec ghost solution suite available to me but i can't make heads or tails of it at the moment.
I've use NTBackup where the data sizes aren't horrendous (about 200GB is a rough limit) and the client can stand having a broken server down for a day. As far as it goes, I've found NTBackup reliable. Meaning, I've never had a problem restoring a server from the backup.
It's missing a lot of important features, though:
Emailed error reporting
Compression (to a disk drive)
Encryption
Dissimilar hardware capability (Well, as long as you don't mind re-installing the entire OS and patching it to the same version as before as a prerequisite to restoring the backup, then you have dissimilar hardware capability).
No matter what backup method you choose, test the result and understand exactly how the software works. I test the integrity of my NTBackup data at least monthly.