• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Disabling Intel's Management Engine (ME)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Intel Management Engine is really only useful for system administrators that handle more then just a few computers?

This feature sounds like it not very useful at all for most users and that it is in fact a backdoor in disguise .
 
That's the general idea . . . that it's an NSA backdoor. One of the reasons why foreign concerns are trying to develop their own hardware platforms and avoid Intel ones.
 
That looks to be a major reason why several countries such as India are funding development of CPUs using the RISK-V ISA. Since RISC-V is a FOSS specification anybody can look at and use, it has the potential to replace both x86 and ARM.
 
whm1974 said:
That looks to be a major reason why several countries such as India are funding development of CPUs using the RISK-V ISA. Since RISC-V is a FOSS specification anybody can look at and use, it has the potential to replace both x86 and ARM.
Click to expand...

RISC-V is to allow CPU's to be developed using common components to reduce development cost - not reinventing the wheel each time. The BSD license that RISC-V is licensed under allows for closed implementations. You can bet that any implementation that will see any successful use will have closed security features.
 
Phynaz said:
Jesus people it's not an NSA backdoor. You're not that important.
Click to expand...

A backdoor can be exploited by anyone. If you think only the NSA can utilize their exploits, you are wrong.

Quite a few nation-state grade exploit toolkits have been leaked this year by the "Shadow Brokers" and other groups.
 
Phynaz said:
RISC-V is to allow CPU's to be developed using common components to reduce development cost - not reinventing the wheel each time. The BSD license that RISC-V is licensed under allows for closed implementations. You can bet that any implementation that will see any successful use will have closed security features.
Click to expand...
I'm sure there will some open implementations available.
 
whm1974 said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Intel Management Engine is really only useful for system administrators that handle more then just a few computers?

This feature sounds like it not very useful at all for most users and that it is in fact a backdoor in disguise .
Click to expand...

Remote management is only one feature. A more consumer-relevant one is DRM - PAVP runs over ME/AMT, afaik. I believe Intel Anti-Theft runs on it as well, but I'm just going off memory for that one.

I seriously doubt the ME was created as a nation-state backdoor, but I would not be shocked to find it's been used as one.

Note, also, that AMD has an equivalent to the ME: the Platform Security Processor.
 
the researcher's technical blog post (layman's history & technical details): http://blog.ptsecurity.com/2017/08/disabling-intel-me.html

that's interesting, intel recently switched to an x86 microcontroller arch running MINIX from an ARCCompact running ThreadX RTOS.

people that used to want AMT disabled dumped the blob firmware, reconstructed it, and tried omitting blocks to see what would work and what wouldn't.
these researchers extracted an xml file from an intel management utility and found a flag that may disable it - how everything is tied together they're still trying to find out.
 
SarahKerrigan said:
Remote management is only one feature. A more consumer-relevant one is DRM - PAVP runs over ME/AMT, afaik. I believe Intel Anti-Theft runs on it as well, but I'm just going off memory for that one.

I seriously doubt the ME was created as a nation-state backdoor, but I would not be shocked to find it's been used as one.

Note, also, that AMD has an equivalent to the ME: the Platform Security Processor.
Click to expand...
The Anti-Theft feature would probably be the only useful feature for consumers.
 
my main concern with it is not "NSA", but it being exploited by hackers in the future
still, there are probably so many easier weak points to exploit before that, so...
 
whm1974 said:
That looks to be a major reason why several countries such as India are funding development of CPUs using the RISK-V ISA. Since RISC-V is a FOSS specification anybody can look at and use, it has the potential to replace both x86 and ARM.
Click to expand...
Not really. Countries like India are trying to jump start their own industries to be less reliant on the west, to include the US.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top