Originally posted by: Megatomic
Excellent, thanks man. I was waiting for this. I didn't want to do a hacked install.
No hacked driver will make any difference to my system. As a result the pulled patch is meaningless to me, too. I have a 9800 Pro. And how do you know whether or not there are bug fixes in 9.0c?Originally posted by: Ackmed
Originally posted by: Megatomic
Excellent, thanks man. I was waiting for this. I didn't want to do a hacked install.
But you want a hacked driver, and a patch thats been recalled? There is currently no offial release of anything that makes use of DX9.0c.
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Originally posted by: Megatomic
Excellent, thanks man. I was waiting for this. I didn't want to do a hacked install.
But you want a hacked driver, and a patch thats been recalled? There is currently no offial release of anything that makes use of DX9.0c.
But you want a hacked driver, and a patch thats been recalled? There is currently no offial release of anything that makes use of DX9.0c.
Release Highlights:
* Updated July 20, 2004 9:00 PM PDT: Windows XP / 2000 61.76 is WHQL certified using DirectX 9.0b. The WHQL tests for DirectX 9.0c were not available at this time. When DirectX 9.0c is available, NVIDIA will release drivers to support it.
Originally posted by: nitromullet
But you want a hacked driver, and a patch thats been recalled? There is currently no offial release of anything that makes use of DX9.0c.
Now that DX9.0c is official, I would assume that we won't have to "hack" our dirvers anymore. nVidia stated that they would come out with drivers that support DX9.0c when DX9.0c was out.
from http://www.nvidia.com/object/winxp_2k_61.76:
Release Highlights:
* Updated July 20, 2004 9:00 PM PDT: Windows XP / 2000 61.76 is WHQL certified using DirectX 9.0b. The WHQL tests for DirectX 9.0c were not available at this time. When DirectX 9.0c is available, NVIDIA will release drivers to support it.
I would think it will take a little bit to get the WHQL cert, but than the drivers will support DX9.0c out of the box.
Originally posted by: Ackmed
I understand that, but as of right now, the only game that will benefit from it, is Farcry. The patch was recalled, but even if it was out, its only a tiny improvement. Not that Im saying more frames is bad, it certainly isnt, but some people get too excited about a new DX thinking it will make all their games faster.
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Ackmed
I understand that, but as of right now, the only game that will benefit from it, is Farcry. The patch was recalled, but even if it was out, its only a tiny improvement. Not that Im saying more frames is bad, it certainly isnt, but some people get too excited about a new DX thinking it will make all their games faster.
18% faster on ATi hardware and 19% faster on nVidia is a "far cry" from a "tiny improvement" if you ask me.
Originally posted by: biostud666
Hmm the 1.2 patch worked fine for me
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: Ackmed
I understand that, but as of right now, the only game that will benefit from it, is Farcry. The patch was recalled, but even if it was out, its only a tiny improvement. Not that Im saying more frames is bad, it certainly isnt, but some people get too excited about a new DX thinking it will make all their games faster.
18% faster on ATi hardware and 19% faster on nVidia is a "far cry" from a "tiny improvement" if you ask me.
Originally posted by: watek
Can I install this over the top of 9.0b without uninstalling my video drivers?
I think it might be the same one. I have XPSP2 beta installed, and all the files are listed as final retail. Can someone who has installed these run a dxdiag and check what build this is. Mine, from XPSP2 is as follows:Originally posted by: JBT
Anyone try to install this over the one ripped out of SP2?
Enduser runtime. The dev kit is for programmers.Originally posted by: Insomniak
Is this the end user runtime or the dev kit? I'm unclear...