Those are SLR 10 plus mpOriginally posted by: edro13
Tell your friend to take a look at a National Geographic. Many of the photographers in there use Digital (Canon 10D or Nikon D100).
They are both 6MP...Originally posted by: glen
Those are SLR 10 plus mpOriginally posted by: edro13
Tell your friend to take a look at a National Geographic. Many of the photographers in there use Digital (Canon 10D or Nikon D100).
Originally posted by: edro13
They are both 6MP...Originally posted by: glen
Those are SLR 10 plus mpOriginally posted by: edro13
Tell your friend to take a look at a National Geographic. Many of the photographers in there use Digital (Canon 10D or Nikon D100).
Originally posted by: DBL
Does your friend realize that practically ALL photos they encountered on a daily basis whether in weekly magazines, daily newspapers or on the web are all taken w/ DSLR cameras?
Originally posted by: edro13
Tell your friend to take a look at a National Geographic. Many of the photographers in there use Digital (Canon 10D or Nikon D100).
Hell... here are some 2MP shots that are close to film quality.
Give a good photographer a crappy camera and he will produce pics that are far better than a newb using a really nice SLR 35mm camera.
The actual limitation of the camera is usually not a factor.
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: edro13
Tell your friend to take a look at a National Geographic. Many of the photographers in there use Digital (Canon 10D or Nikon D100).
Hell... here are some 2MP shots that are close to film quality.
Give a good photographer a crappy camera and he will produce pics that are far better than a newb using a really nice SLR 35mm camera.
The actual limitation of the camera is usually not a factor.
Those are some beautiful pics. Are those A40 pics with the stock lense?
Originally posted by: richardycc
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: edro13
Tell your friend to take a look at a National Geographic. Many of the photographers in there use Digital (Canon 10D or Nikon D100).
Hell... here are some 2MP shots that are close to film quality.
Give a good photographer a crappy camera and he will produce pics that are far better than a newb using a really nice SLR 35mm camera.
The actual limitation of the camera is usually not a factor.
Those are some beautiful pics. Are those A40 pics with the stock lense?
what other lens can you use with the A40??![]()
Originally posted by: glen
He never disputed DSLR cameras, just everyday point and shoot digicams, which I content can make awfully good photographs, he just has not seen them.
Originally posted by: Metron
Current digital technology EXCEEDS the maximum resolutions possible with film, even when using the most expensive film cameras.
Tell your friend film died a few years ago when 10 megapixel CCD's appeared on the scene, which is why you see so many used high end film cameras for sale.
I took these pictures with my trusty Canon S500 (5MP) in Hawaii:
Sunset 1
Sunset 2
I'll reinterate, film is dead.
Metron
Originally posted by: flot
Sorry for the slow speed, but here is one of my shots from hawaii.
From a $300 Kodak camera.
Hawaii Coast
Originally posted by: DBL
Originally posted by: Metron
Current digital technology EXCEEDS the maximum resolutions possible with film, even when using the most expensive film cameras.
Tell your friend film died a few years ago when 10 megapixel CCD's appeared on the scene, which is why you see so many used high end film cameras for sale.
I took these pictures with my trusty Canon S500 (5MP) in Hawaii:
Sunset 1
Sunset 2
I'll reinterate, film is dead.
Metron
What digital camera would I need to exceed the resolution contained in a 4"x5" or 8"x10" negative from a Large format camera?
