i'd have to go with the nikon 880, especially for 8x10's. I was choosing between this and the kodak dc4800, I think I'm going for the 880 despite a significant price difference (esp with the 4800 having a $100 rebate offer).
I chose it based on the reviews at
dpreview.com. Too many other camera review sites never list the negatives, this guy does. i was actually thinking about buying the
sony dsc-f505v, but I decided not too after reading his review on it. it runs for about 800 but the reviewer states it has a problem with slightly long shutter lag & startup, despite taking awesome pics. starngely, quite a few expensive sony's have the same problem, but they're about to release their new models too.
previously, i had a coolpix 800 and took excellent pics, but it seemed very flimsy/cheap. nikon didn't make the same mistake with the 880 though, it's solidly built (i don't own one yet but i've tried it out at the store). the 880 also has a fast shutter lag (for sub $1000 cams, anyway). about the only negatives i've seen is the lack of an included rechargeable, and the lack of a mic (ie no sound for movies, not a big issue for me). also, the nikon 990 (3.3Mp, the same as the 880) had a problem with
"hot pixels". I don't know how common it is but this isn't the only page that talks about it. hopefully they cleared it up on this model.