meltdown75
Lifer
- Nov 17, 2004
- 37,548
- 7
- 81
Ah, I just finished downloading some copyrighted material. Feels good.Originally posted by: tangent1138
i must've missed the place in the constitution where it says BoberFett gets to decide the definition of Limited Time.Originally posted by: BoberFett
Non sequitur. Read the whole damn post. Copyright was not originally set up in this country so that corporations could lock up every shred of human knowledge and creativity. It was intended to promote the sciences and useful arts, through a LIMITED TIME monopoly. Copyright is now essentially neverending. Every time the copyright on Steamboat Willy is about to expire, and thereby enter the public domain, Disney gets copyright extended even further. The contract that those copyright holders had with US citizens, the agreement that they would be given a LIMITED TIME monopoly on the duplication of their works, has been broken. Therefore I feel no need to hold up my end of the contract and will duplicate to my heart's desire. When copyright is returned to the 21 year limit (plus one possible 14 year extension) as it was originally, then I'll reconsider.
all i know is that, as a garbage man, if i work really hard and haul away peoples trash, it seems right that i should be able to sit at home throughout my lifetime and reap the benefits of my hard work. if people don't see value in my work, then they can live in piles of trash.Originally posted by: tangent1138
all i know is that, as a content producer, if i work really hard and create something good, it seems right that i should be able to sell it throughout my lifetime and reap the benefits of my hard work. if people don't see value in my work, then they don't have to buy it.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Ah, I just finished downloading some copyrighted material. Feels good.Originally posted by: tangent1138
i must've missed the place in the constitution where it says BoberFett gets to decide the definition of Limited Time.Originally posted by: BoberFett
Non sequitur. Read the whole damn post. Copyright was not originally set up in this country so that corporations could lock up every shred of human knowledge and creativity. It was intended to promote the sciences and useful arts, through a LIMITED TIME monopoly. Copyright is now essentially neverending. Every time the copyright on Steamboat Willy is about to expire, and thereby enter the public domain, Disney gets copyright extended even further. The contract that those copyright holders had with US citizens, the agreement that they would be given a LIMITED TIME monopoly on the duplication of their works, has been broken. Therefore I feel no need to hold up my end of the contract and will duplicate to my heart's desire. When copyright is returned to the 21 year limit (plus one possible 14 year extension) as it was originally, then I'll reconsider.
Sorry, were you saying something?
Originally posted by: LS20
????????..........?/;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;,-'' ~--~': :¯¯ :''': : ¯: : '''-?;;;;;;;;;
?????????...?.,';;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;,-': : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :'''-?;....;;;',
?????????..?.|;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;/: : : : : : ' -: : : : : , -'': : : : : : : ;;...;;;'|
?????????.?.',;;;;;;;;;;;;;;,':|: : : : : : : : : ',: : : : : : :,-~: : : :'',;;;;.,,,
??????????..|;;;;;;;;;;;;?-': _??-~~'''''''~-?_: :,: : : . : ,-~~---??_: ',
??????????..|;;;;;;;;;;,': ::,'?-~'''''¯¯¯''''-?-''::-'~--- ? :;"_¯¯¯_ '' :
??????????..|;;;;;;;;;,': : : : :,~''¯o¯'''): ;;;;;:|:: :,|: :'?_ o__''~,: :',|
??????????..|;;;;;;;;,': : : : : :¯¯¯¯¯__,-'','::|: : :'''?:'~--¯: : : : .: :;|
??????????..'-,;;;;;;;',::: : : : :¯¯¯¯: : : ::::: : : : : ?: :''' : : : : : :....;|
???????????.|;,~,;;;|::: : : : : : : : : : ,-'¯'',:::: : : :|''-?: : : : : : :''-'
???????????.',|:::|;,':::::: : : : : : : : :/'-??-_: : : :_??-'': : : : : : ': |
???????????..|:::|;;|:::::: : : : : : : :,';;;;;;;;¯¯''''';;;;;;;;;: : : : : : :,
???????????..',::|;;;:::: : : : : : : ,';;;;;;;;;_????_??;;;;;;;;',: : :: : :,'
????????????'''~;;;',:::: : : : : :/;;;;;;;?-"______''''~?;;;',: :,': '/ THIS IS SPARTAAAAAAA!
?????????????.',;;;''-?:::::::::,';;;;;;,':,-';;~-----~';: :.;;;: : ,-;/
??????????????;;;;;''-?::::,';;;;;;,':/;'';;;;,;;;;;;;;;',:|;;;''-??-'';;/|
??????????????..;;;;;;;''~;;;;;;;|: |;;;;;;;,;;;;;;;;;|:|;;;;;;;;;;,': |____
??????????????..|:',;;;;;;;;;;;;;,':',: '-,;;;;;;;;;;;,-':,':|;;;;;;;;;|''¯::::::::'''''~~~--?
??????????_______???|:::;;;;;;;;;;;|: :'' -?:'''~----~'':,-': :|;;;;;;;;|¯¯¯''''''''~-??:::::|
????????..??-''_:::::::::::::,|::::',;;;;;;;;;',: : : '''-??__??-''__: :|;;;;;;;,'''''~-?;;;;;;;;;'''''-?::::
??????_??-~''|: ,':::::::::::::,-':|::::|;;;;;;;;;;;: : :'''¯¯¯¯¯'''': : :,';;;;;;;|: : : : :''''-??;;;;;;;;'''-?:'-,?__
????._?-'''::::::::|: |::::::::::,-''::,-':::::;;;;;;;;;;;;'''~--??_::::::_??-'';;;;;;;;;|: ' ,: : : : : '''~-?_?-''¯:::::::''-?_
???.,-''?_:::::::::::',: :,-'::::|: :-'': : ::::::;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;|: : : :__???==~''''''¯¯:::::::::::::''''~-??
???./: : :'',:,-~''¯¯, ::::::::|: : : : : :::::::;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;,''~~'''¯::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::''''~-?
??.,-': : : :,-',-|¯¯: : : :',:::,': : :-'': : :::::::::''-?;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;/::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::''''-??_
?..,-': :''-,: /:::,': : : : : : :',:/: : : :,-''::::::::::,-''':;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;,-'''::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~~~-----????__:::::::::::''''-??
...../: : : ' -,/:::/: : : : : : : : |: : : : : :-''::::,-'::::::'''-?;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;?-''::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::'''''''~~~--??:::'' '-??
..../: : : : : |:::|: : : : : : : : :|: : : : : : :-''::::,-'::::::'''-?;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;?-''::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::'''''''~~~--??:::'':-:::::::::::::::''''''~~~--~~'''::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::''''~ ?
Originally posted by: tangent1138
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Ah, I just finished downloading some copyrighted material. Feels good.Originally posted by: tangent1138
i must've missed the place in the constitution where it says BoberFett gets to decide the definition of Limited Time.Originally posted by: BoberFett
Non sequitur. Read the whole damn post. Copyright was not originally set up in this country so that corporations could lock up every shred of human knowledge and creativity. It was intended to promote the sciences and useful arts, through a LIMITED TIME monopoly. Copyright is now essentially neverending. Every time the copyright on Steamboat Willy is about to expire, and thereby enter the public domain, Disney gets copyright extended even further. The contract that those copyright holders had with US citizens, the agreement that they would be given a LIMITED TIME monopoly on the duplication of their works, has been broken. Therefore I feel no need to hold up my end of the contract and will duplicate to my heart's desire. When copyright is returned to the 21 year limit (plus one possible 14 year extension) as it was originally, then I'll reconsider.
Sorry, were you saying something?
Wow, you really zinged me there!
That BoberFett is a witty one!
Originally posted by: BoberFett
all i know is that, as a garbage man, if i work really hard and haul away peoples trash, it seems right that i should be able to sit at home throughout my lifetime and reap the benefits of my hard work. if people don't see value in my work, then they can live in piles of trash.Originally posted by: tangent1138
all i know is that, as a content producer, if i work really hard and create something good, it seems right that i should be able to sell it throughout my lifetime and reap the benefits of my hard work. if people don't see value in my work, then they don't have to buy it.
Yeah, sounds pretty stupid doesn't it?
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Sorry, I guess I'll bow to your superior wit. No way I can top something like "i must've missed the place in the constitution where it says BoberFett gets to decide the definition of Limited Time."
:roll:
I do have one tip though. If you're going to criticize wit, learn how to properly punctuate and capitalize, dumbass.
Wish I could say the same to you. I hope your "content" is pirated endlessly and you die penniless.Originally posted by: tangent1138
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Sorry, I guess I'll bow to your superior wit. No way I can top something like "i must've missed the place in the constitution where it says BoberFett gets to decide the definition of Limited Time."
:roll:
I do have one tip though. If you're going to criticize wit, learn how to properly punctuate and capitalize, dumbass.
I'm sorry I made you sad, BoberFett. It was all in good fun. Have a nice day...
Originally posted by: BlameCanada
http://...../
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: tangent1138
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: tangent1138
yes, you're right... government protection of a business model is stupid.
i think i'll go down to the BMW dealership and steal a car. The cops better not protect their business model by stopping me.
wake up. piracy is rampant and in case you haven't noticed, entertainment is one of the few things this country does well anymore.
cars? japan.
cell phones? korea.
computers? china.
the only thing we do really well is software, games, movies.
Copyright isn't like property ownership no matter how much the industry shills try to mix the two. My right to copy a work is protected by the constitution of the United States.
The idea behind copyright is that the public gives up their rights for a limited time which encourages the production of works. But media companies have changed that. The length of protection is such that I will never see my side of the trade, works enter the public domain, so why should I grant them their side of the trade a monopoly on copying the work?
where in the constitution does it say you have a right to copy a work?
that's a genuine question. i'm not being sarcastic.
and where do your rights as consumer end and my rights as a content producer begin?
don't i have a right to put whatever DRM i want on my content?
Article 1 section 8
To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;
So after a limited time the writings are free to be copied.
And that is still the case today.
Originally posted by: tangent1138
all i know is that, as a content producer, if i work really hard and create something good, it seems right that i should be able to sell it throughout my lifetime and reap the benefits of my hard work. if people don't see value in my work, then they don't have to buy it.
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: tangent1138
all i know is that, as a content producer, if i work really hard and create something good, it seems right that i should be able to sell it throughout my lifetime and reap the benefits of my hard work. if people don't see value in my work, then they don't have to buy it.
Why? if you sell me your work that you worked real hard at why should I not be free to see that it is a good idea and start producing the same product. Why can't you compete with me if it is such a good idea?
If picking up garbage is a really good idea shouldn't I be the only one allowed to provide that service?
Originally posted by: BlameCanada
I think I'm going to use the number 2 as a key in a new DRM scheme. From now on all instances of "2" are forbidden!
Originally posted by: tangent1138
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: exdeath
In the constitution, we've been over that already. A producer of an original work is indeed entitled to profit compensation for their work, research, time, etc. It's the capitalist way.
But how long is long enough? What is up for debate is how long exclusive rights should be awarded for a work. 95 years is ridiculous, or I'd have to be paying Henry Ford and his descendants to get a license grant to assemble a go-kart in my back yard, just to point out one example of how absurd unreasonably long term copyrights and patents are.
Patents expire after a much shorter period of time than copyrights. You can't compare patents to Elvis's greatest hits.
Only because of lobbying by media producers to increase copyright times to something unreasonable to secure their dreams of 'something for nothing' so they can continue repackaging the same movie for $20 even years after the original actors are dead and gone. It would be the same thing if Henry Ford successfully lobbied to have patent times extended to 150 years so he and his family would retain a monopoly on the assembly line production of automobiles. But he didn't have to do that because he didn't plan on selling the Model T for $25,000 in 2007. He was busy coming up with new things and designing new cars that people would buy, not figuring out ways to protect his monopoly so he could sell the same thing forever without innovating anymore. And people want to buy new movies all the time as well, so why is Hollywood so concerned about retaining exclusive rights to stuff that was made over 50 years ago when people are lining up to see new stuff?
A work is a work. Why is it that it's ok for someone who records a record 50 years ago to retain a monopoly on that work, but the person who discovers the cure for cancer has to give up his monopoly after only 20 years?
What is the difference?
"Article 1 section 8
To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries"
There is no separate distinction or priority given to either.
I'm waiting for you to say that the cure for cancer is more beneficial to society so we should take away exclusive rights sooner to benefit all; that would make you the socialist.
you're right. we should extend the patent to 50 years. you should write your elected officials about that.
all i know is that, as a content producer, if i work really hard and create something good, it seems right that i should be able to sell it throughout my lifetime and reap the benefits of my hard work. if people don't see value in my work, then they don't have to buy it.
Originally posted by: MmmSkyscraper
Originally posted by: BlameCanada
I think I'm going to use the number 2 as a key in a new DRM scheme. From now on all instances of "2" are forbidden!
I wanted #2![]()
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: tangent1138
all i know is that, as a content producer, if i work really hard and create something good, it seems right that i should be able to sell it throughout my lifetime and reap the benefits of my hard work. if people don't see value in my work, then they don't have to buy it.
Why? if you sell me your work that you worked real hard at why should I not be free to see that it is a good idea and start producing the same product. Why can't you compete with me if it is such a good idea?
If picking up garbage is a really good idea shouldn't I be the only one allowed to provide that service?
Originally posted by: BlameCanada
Originally posted by: MmmSkyscraper
Originally posted by: BlameCanada
I think I'm going to use the number 2 as a key in a new DRM scheme. From now on all instances of "2" are forbidden!
I wanted #2![]()
Watch it buddy, I'll let you off with a warning this time.
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: tangent1138
all i know is that, as a content producer, if i work really hard and create something good, it seems right that i should be able to sell it throughout my lifetime and reap the benefits of my hard work. if people don't see value in my work, then they don't have to buy it.
Why? if you sell me your work that you worked real hard at why should I not be free to see that it is a good idea and start producing the same product. Why can't you compete with me if it is such a good idea?
If picking up garbage is a really good idea shouldn't I be the only one allowed to provide that service?
Yeah, and you only do it one time, and never have to do it again because you were really good at it for a week. But people still have to pay you. You don't have to work for another week or get another job when the money runs out.
And if people stop paying, you can just snuggle up with some of your buddies in the government and get them to require people to continue paying you for 101 years after you've picked up their trash.
Seriously, people DO deserve compensation for their work. But the free ride has to end after some amount of time. Otherwise we would be paying somebody a fee every time we uttered words such as "Mona Lisa"
Originally posted by: MmmSkyscraper
Originally posted by: BlameCanada
Originally posted by: MmmSkyscraper
Originally posted by: BlameCanada
I think I'm going to use the number 2 as a key in a new DRM scheme. From now on all instances of "2" are forbidden!
I wanted #2![]()
Watch it buddy, I'll let you off with a warning this time.
:Q
/me hides under desk from cease & desist police
Wish I could say the same to you. I hope your "content" is pirated endlessly and you die penniless.Originally posted by: BoberFett
[
Originally posted by: tangent1138
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: smack Down
Originally posted by: tangent1138
all i know is that, as a content producer, if i work really hard and create something good, it seems right that i should be able to sell it throughout my lifetime and reap the benefits of my hard work. if people don't see value in my work, then they don't have to buy it.
Why? if you sell me your work that you worked real hard at why should I not be free to see that it is a good idea and start producing the same product. Why can't you compete with me if it is such a good idea?
If picking up garbage is a really good idea shouldn't I be the only one allowed to provide that service?
Yeah, and you only do it one time, and never have to do it again because you were really good at it for a week. But people still have to pay you. You don't have to work for another week or get another job when the money runs out.
And if people stop paying, you can just snuggle up with some of your buddies in the government and get them to require people to continue paying you for 101 years after you've picked up their trash.
Seriously, people DO deserve compensation for their work. But the free ride has to end after some amount of time. Otherwise we would be paying somebody a fee every time we uttered words such as "Mona Lisa"
surely you can see the different between going to a store an buying a music CD versus the service industry of getting garbage picked up?