• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Differences between TSMC 16nm FF+ (Pascal) and GloFo 14nm LPP (Polaris)?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Which if true would suggest AMD think TSMC is better. We can guess they have no choice but to use some GloFo 14nm to fulfil the wafer contract, so why use any TSMC as that means designing chips for a whole other node, an expensive and time consuming process? If GloFo could make the big gpu's surely that would be all they need?

my guess is tsmc for things like their ARM opteron. GPU and Zen are already confirmed 14nm afaik

I'd be surprised if their GPUs were on different processes. worrying about volume wouldn't justify that and who is to say TSMC is better for the big chips? its still a new process. If they are both too risky then maybe. But the best I think would be things like console APUs and ARM processors for a different process.
 
Last edited:
No. AMD is working on 16FF+ GPUs, just poke around LinkedIn for a bit.

16nm FF+ GPUs =/= 16nm FF+ dGPUs. They may very well mean just the iGP of an APU.

Also, if you use linkedin as a source you might end up thinking there were 20nm gpus 2 years ago, AMD is using PDSOI for some of their upcoming products, and Puma is getting their sucessor. Yeah, nothing of that really happened.
 
So a member with a post count of 4 goes into a thread that has been dead for 4 months to start a flame war by throwing salt at AMD...

This just needs reporting and closing.
 
Per popular demand, and 4 reported posts entries, I am locking this flamefest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top