Difference between DDR2-533 and DDR2-800

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
Originally posted by: jmke
no, they say there is no BIG performance difference... which there isn't...

Big enough to be worth it. you can buy a 667Mhz kit for $292 and a 800Mhz kit for about $305.

That's not much more to pay for a kit that is faster and definately will overclock.

this is assuming you're buying D9 based memory which I always recommend people do.

People playing the lowest price game will always get crap ICs and probably don't care about major performance anyway so to them this article speaks. To me and people who want maximum performance, no way.
 

hans007

Lifer
Feb 1, 2000
20,212
18
81
the difference is effectively nothing.

it depends though.


ddr2-533 is typically CL 4. the equivalent latency ddr2-800 would be cl6. but most is CL5, so you'd have a miniscule latency advantage.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
Originally posted by: hans007
the difference is effectively nothing.

it depends though.


ddr2-533 is typically CL 4. the equivalent latency ddr2-800 would be cl6. but most is CL5, so you'd have a miniscule latency advantage.

try This

That thread talks about memory speeds providing a difference. It does have an impact. Take a look. We have numbers too
 

hans007

Lifer
Feb 1, 2000
20,212
18
81
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Originally posted by: hans007
the difference is effectively nothing.

it depends though.


ddr2-533 is typically CL 4. the equivalent latency ddr2-800 would be cl6. but most is CL5, so you'd have a miniscule latency advantage.

try This

That thread talks about memory speeds providing a difference. It does have an impact. Take a look. We have numbers too



that is not really a fair comparison..


the memory bandwidth doesnt matter. its still the latencys and ras timings that matter.


you guys used ddr2-800 at 4-4-3-4 vs ddr2-1000 at 5-5-5-4

the tras is equivalent on those, but a cycle at 1000mhz is 25% faster than one at 800mhz.

for the latencies to be equivalent at difference clock speeds you have to do

ddr-2-800 4-4-4-4 vs ddr2-1000 5-5-5-5. so that all latencies at ddr2-1000 would be exactly 25% higher to compensate for the 20% shorter cycles.

that said, you could be right. but the main idea is that if the bus is 1066mhz @ 64bits it can only take advantage of 533mhz of 128bit bus memorybandwith maximum. dual channel ddr2-533 is exactly the same bandwidth as 1066 p4 bus @ 64bit (each memory channel is 128bits x 533 effective clock).