-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
difference between cc0 and cb0 ?
- Thread starter Feer
- Start date
Those are stepping revisions. cb0 .18u PIIIs are capable of SMP (earlier revisions of that CPU had the feature disabled). cc0 is the magic stepping number for doing SMP with .18u Celerons. So, in your case, it doesn't really matter which stepping revision you have between the two.
Down Load this, it will tell you what you have.
http://www.fileflash.com/index.asp?action=info&program=686
http://www.fileflash.com/index.asp?action=info&program=686
Down Load this, it will tell you what you have.
http://www.fileflash.com/index.asp?action=info&program=686
http://www.fileflash.com/index.asp?action=info&program=686
If I am remembering correctly, the difference is:
1. A ~%5 shrink, when they went from cB0 to cC0.
2. A few new bug fixes.
3. A few new bugs causing difficulties at high speeds (including one that caused Intel to recall tons of 1GHz+ cC0 chips).
4. cC0s overclock a little bit better, but as always, you can get a dud cC0 chip that will do a LOT less than the average cB0.
Nack
1. A ~%5 shrink, when they went from cB0 to cC0.
2. A few new bug fixes.
3. A few new bugs causing difficulties at high speeds (including one that caused Intel to recall tons of 1GHz+ cC0 chips).
4. cC0s overclock a little bit better, but as always, you can get a dud cC0 chip that will do a LOT less than the average cB0.
Nack