Did the military always have crew cuts?

imported_goku

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2004
7,613
3
0
Did our military always have crew cuts? I could have sworn when watching band of brothers that the soldiers would have relatively normal hair. Maybe some one can enlighten me about this 'hair requirement' that maybe it's just short hair that is needed and not a crew cut/shaved etc.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: goku
Did our military always have crew cuts? I could have sworn when watching band of brothers that the soldiers would have relatively normal hair. Maybe some one can enlighten me about this 'hair requirement' that maybe it's just short hair that is needed and not a crew cut/shaved etc.

Crew cuts are usally setup for new recruits. Standardization and remove the indivigual's uniqueness

Then it is allowed to grown longer once at an active duty station.

However, the limitation/style will vary based on unit and tradition.

 

Feldenak

Lifer
Jan 31, 2003
14,090
2
81
Originally posted by: goku
Did our military always have crew cuts? I could have sworn when watching band of brothers that the soldiers would have relatively normal hair. Maybe some one can enlighten me about this 'hair requirement' that maybe it's just short hair that is needed and not a crew cut/shaved etc.

Things are relaxed in the field (especially during wartime).

To paraphrase something I heard once...A war ready unit will never pass a stateside inspection.
 

funkymatt

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2005
3,919
1
81
Exposure times were quite long (sometimes up to like 5-10 minutes) for a picture. It?s probably for stability.
 

SVT Cobra

Lifer
Mar 29, 2005
13,264
2
0
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: funkymatt
Exposure times were quite long (sometimes up to like 5-10 minutes) for a picture. It?s probably for stability.

Could be, but since Napoleon was doing it before cameras were invented I'm guessing not.

Maybe they just like to scratch their stomachs.

Or maybe they're getting ready to pull a gun on the photographer if he does anything shady.

;)

An old rumor is Napoleon chewed his finger nails and wanted to hide it, that or something about a disfigured hand, can't remember. But, also I think it was adopted as a sign of authority when taking a picture.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
65,242
13,510
146
"Crew Cuts" are optional, but all branches of the military have hair length regs, and have since WWII. No, in the field during wartime, you're not required to find the nearest barbershop and keep it high & tight, but you WILL be expected to get it cut when you get back to a rear area that has facilities for such. During Vietnam, lots of us ended up in the bush for weeks on end, and haircuts weren't always available. Got pretty shaggy sometimes, (and many even grew moustaches and beards) but as soon as possible, we got it cut back to regs or nearly so anyway...A lot depended on your commanding officer, and the NCO's you had to deal with.
 

CVSiN

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2004
9,289
0
0
depends on what service you serve...
Navy and Coast Guard and AF all have pretty relaxed hair grooming rules...
where as Army and Marines do require a much shorter cut..

also depends what Unit you are attached to... some of the "special groups" are supposed to look like civvies so they are encouraged to grow thier hair and facial hair longer. so they can fit in where they serve...
 

huberm

Golden Member
Dec 17, 2004
1,105
1
0
back in the hippy era i believe it was permitted in the Air Force to wear a wig if you wanted long hair. It was quite common to see people with really short hair, and at the end of the day they would pull their wig off and expose a pony tail.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
65,242
13,510
146
Originally posted by: huberm
back in the hippy era i believe it was permitted in the Air Force to wear a wig if you wanted long hair. It was quite common to see people with really short hair, and at the end of the day they would pull their wig off and expose a pony tail.

Don't know that it was "permitted" in the active duty branch, but it was pretty common in the reserves/guard units. Usually, if someone got caught, they were ordered to get it cut. I remember a couple of court battles about it...and the serviceman almost always lost. Remember, in the military, you don't have a lot of rights...especially when it comes to dress and appearance issues.
 

SVT Cobra

Lifer
Mar 29, 2005
13,264
2
0
Originally posted by: CVSiN
depends on what service you serve...
Navy and Coast Guard and AF all have pretty relaxed hair grooming rules...
where as Army and Marines do require a much shorter cut..

also depends what Unit you are attached to... some of the "special groups" are supposed to look like civvies so they are encouraged to grow thier hair and facial hair longer. so they can fit in where they serve...

Pretty much only Delta and Devgru are allowed "relaxed grooming standards."
 

CVSiN

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2004
9,289
0
0
Originally posted by: F22 Raptor
Originally posted by: CVSiN
depends on what service you serve...
Navy and Coast Guard and AF all have pretty relaxed hair grooming rules...
where as Army and Marines do require a much shorter cut..

also depends what Unit you are attached to... some of the "special groups" are supposed to look like civvies so they are encouraged to grow thier hair and facial hair longer. so they can fit in where they serve...

Pretty much only Delta and Devgru are allowed "relaxed grooming standards."

thats why "special groups" was said like that... ;)
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: funkymatt
Exposure times were quite long (sometimes up to like 5-10 minutes) for a picture. It?s probably for stability.

Could be, but since Napoleon was doing it before cameras were invented I'm guessing not.

Maybe they just like to scratch their stomachs.

Or maybe they're getting ready to pull a gun on the photographer if he does anything shady.

;)

Yeah...it's to keep your trigger finger warm and ready for action ;)

Army Regulation 670-1 is much more flexible than you would think regarding hair:
Male haircuts will conform to the following standards.

The hair on top of the head must be neatly groomed. The length and bulk of the hair may not be excessive or present a ragged, unkempt, or extreme appearance. The hair must present a tapered appearance. A tapered appearance is one where the outline of the soldier?s hair conforms to the shape of the head, curving inward to the natural termination point at the base of the neck. When the hair is combed, it will not fall over the ears or eyebrows, or touch the collar, except for the closely cut hair at the back of the neck. The block-cut fullness in the back is permitted to a moderate degree, as long as the tapered look is maintained.... Males are not authorized to wear braids, cornrows, or dreadlocks (unkempt, twisted, matted, individual parts of hair) while in uniform or in civilian clothes on duty. Hair that is clipped closely or shaved to the scalp is authorized.

However, every unit I've been in has enforced a much stricter standard...