Originally posted by: conjur
Clarke did no such thing.
as i said in the other thread, he is directly contradicting himself regardless of "spin" and still says what he said in 02 is true including this:
CLARKE: One of the big problems was that Pakistan at the time was aiding the other side, was aiding the Taliban. And so, this would put, if we started aiding the Northern Alliance against the Taliban, this would have put us directly in opposition to the Pakistani government. These are not easy decisions.
ANGLE:
And none of that really changed until we were attacked and then it was ...
CLARKE:
No, that's not true. In the spring, the Bush administration changed ? began to change Pakistani policy, um, by a dialogue that said we would be willing to lift sanctions. So we began to offer carrots, which made it possible for the Pakistanis, I think, to begin to realize that they could go down another path, which was to join us and to break away from the Taliban. So that's really how it started.
according to clarke(in '02) bush took clintons plan and not only started on it but added to it
BEFORE 911 if these DIRECT statements by clarke are true..
even as he now says he did NOT say anything untrue in the 02 interview then the bush administration did more to pursue al queada in 9 months than clinton did in 8 YEARS.
but now he says clinton did more...but oh wait!! both are true and he never lied then or now!
the truth is he did not think what he said then would come back to bite him on the @$$, but it did.