• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Dick Cheney was on a mission to pull the wool over voters? eyes.

Gaard

Diamond Member
Reactions and analysis to Tuesday's vice presidential debate

Cheney's whopper (Joe Trippi)

My quick take on last night?s debate in Cleveland was that John Edwards won the Q&A portion of the debate on points, and that Dick Cheney won the closing argument on points. All well and good, a push of sorts.

But is anyone going to say what really happened ? and do it without giggling?

Dick Cheney was on a mission to pull the wool over voters? eyes. Edwards ?has got his facts wrong,? he claimed. ?I have not suggested there?s a connection between Iraq and 9/11.?

HELLO?

Everyone reporting on this race knew that Dick Cheney had just told a whopper. But nearly no one called him on it. Chris Mathews did not let it pass ? he would not let Ben Ginsberg off the hook late last night on the Cheney whopper. But most others that brought it up on the air or in print did so with a chuckle and a ?pols will be pols? attitude condoning the vice president?s incredible ability to say just about anything with a straight face.


The debate started last night with John Edwards charging that the Bush/Cheney administration had failed to tell the American people the truth. Dick Cheney last night proved John Edwards case for him, with distortions, half-truths, and finally with a bold-faced lie.

That should be the coverage. It was obvious who was playing fast and loose with the truth and it was Dick Cheney.

I call em like I see' em ? I hate more than anything politics as usual and last night it was the Vice President of the United States somehow winning a debate according to a lot of the experts, experts who gave him a pass on a lie. I guess I have to go to some special ?fair and balanced? school to watch John Edwards say repeatedly that Dick Cheney isn?t leveling with the American people, then watch as Dick Cheney tells a whopper of a lie on national television, and still call the debate a push or give it on points to the guy that told the best whopper and got away with it.

On points, it?s a push for Cheney, I would say.

And of course when it came to the truth, well? let?s just say that Cheney is in a league of his own.



Morning after at the scorer's table (Keith Olbermann)

A major truth foul has been declared against Vice President Dick Cheney, and his narrow victory over John Edwards in last night's Light Heavyweight Debate has been overturned by the Boxing Commission scoring the bout (me).

While rounds were scored even and Edwards was ahead on points at its conclusion, Cheney had been awarded the contest on the intangibles and the overall impact? largely because of a memorable phrase that underpinned his left-right combination that nailed Edwards in the solar plexus of his inexperience and the breadbasket of his alleged prioritizing of electioneering instead of Senatorial work: "In my capacity as vice president, I am the president of Senate, the presiding officer. I'm up in the Senate most Tuesdays when they're in session. The first time I ever met you was when you walked on the stage tonight."

But Cheney and Edwards have met at least twice, once inside the Senate. Who did the Vice President know, and when did he know him?Within an hour of the last of the 21 rounds, a "freeze frame" from a C-SPAN telecast of Senator Edwards and Vice President Cheney at a 2001 Prayer Breakfast was being circulated around the internet.

And by morning, the Kerry-Edwards campaign had produced irrefutable evidence that when Elizabeth Dole was sworn in by Senate President Cheney as the junior senator from North Carolina just last year, it was Senator Edwards who (with her husband) escorted her to Mr. Cheney. Senator Dole was sworn in using Mrs. Edwards' bible.


The only way Cheney could have avoided meeting Edwards was if he'd had an attack of tunnel vision, or cauliflower ear.

"The first time I ever met you" was the cornerstone of post-fight analysis and Cheney's goal of making viewers dismiss Edwards. It's now been turned around on the vice president and accompanying spin doctors. The prospect of this outcome was forecast in last night's original scoring of this bout. This reporter expects a day of heavy piling on by Democratic spinners, with great success.

The Boxing Commission (me) thus penalizes Fighter Cheney 10 points for untruthfulness, 10 points for forgetting his acquaintances, 2 points for snideness, and 2 points for hitting himself with his own jab. Republican spin doctors are penalized 10 points each for premature jocularity. This fight is awarded to Fighter Edwards on points.

The Boxing Commission will reconvene here Friday night for Bush-Kerry II, the Kablooey in St. Louie.

more...
 
Cheney went nuts last night. Like he was on a murderous rampage. He just stabbed and stabbed and lied. It's _almost_ funny.

Honestly, what does Cheney live for? I mean he has money. Does he just want more? He probably couldn't even spend it all if he retired now. Or does he just want to make sure the world is a terrible place when he dies?

 
I've been watching CNN most of the day and even though they do mention the lie, they don't make a big deal about. I'm so freaking amazed at this. He basically lied straight to the American people and they act like he was off by a digit in representing jobs or something. This reporter on CNN made the case that the debate was more about Kerry than about Bush. How did he come to this conclusion? By counting how many times Kerry's name came up compared to Bush ! How stupid is that! Edwards mentioned Kerry's name so many times in talking about their plan and would directly follow with this administration did this or that.

Just boggles the mind. The main story on all the papers and news channels should've been that Cheney lied to the American public but it wasn't. Not only were we misled to go to war but we were misled clearly in the debate. Evidence was easily obtainable right after the debate and it was reported as nothing more than just a wrong fact. Only person that bothered standing up was Chris Matthews but everyone should've been making a huge deal out of this. The media failed us all. :/

Chris Matthews: "Why would the Vice President deny something that?s on public record? We?ve got the tape to show it. He has connected 9/11 to Saddam Hussein. He has said it, we have it on tape, and he denied it tonight. That?s not honest is it?" [MSNBC, 10/05/04]

Chris Matthews: "The vice president said that he never said that Saddam Hussein was responsible in any way for what happened to us at the World Trade Center in 2001. Brian Williams and his people pulled up the tapes of him saying exactly that. Now this is a question of honesty. Why did the vice president deny something that he had said, which is on the record? It?s not a question of what you think, it?s a question of what you said. And if the vice president denied last night he ever said that Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11, he?s not telling the truth." [Chris Matthews, MSNBC, 10/6/04]

Unbelievable more people didn't have this same reaction. 🙁
 
Maybe because he lies so much that people aren't making it a big deal about it now. I don't know. What I do know, though, is that it's a crying shame to have the VP lie to the people so much and so blatantly. It's unacceptable. These people have to go.
 
🙁 It's so sad. He's such an extreme liar. This is not just about getting a bj either. It's about stuff that matters. Why don't people see it?!
 
Published on Wednesday, October 6, 2004 by the Toronto Star
Truth First Casualty of Cheney Debate Style
by Antonia Zerbisias


It's a wonder that millions of TV screens didn't shatter as U.S. Vice-President Dick Cheney's nose poked right through them last night. Just as he has in many, if not all, of his TV appearances since the terror attacks of 9/11, Cheney lied again during his 90-minute debate with Democratic vice-presidential contender, North Carolina Senator John Edwards.


Cheney even lied about lying about Iraq's supposed stores of weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein's supposed ties to Al Qaeda, and just about everything else in this supposed "war on terror" ? not to mention the illicit activities of Halliburton, the oil field supply corporation he used to run in the 1990s.


"The senator has got his facts wrong," Cheney said after the first of many times Edwards hammered him on Osama bin Laden. " I have not suggested there's a connection between Iraq and 9/11, but there's clearly an established Iraqi track record with terror."


If this column had a video component, right now we'd be rolling back the tape to show Cheney on CNBC's The Capital Report, as recently as last June, lying to host Gloria Berger. He denied what he said on Meet The Press in 2001, that it was "pretty well confirmed" that lead 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta had meetings with Iraqi intelligence.


"No, I never said that. ... Absolutely not," he told her ? although he did.


That's also how it went last night when Edwards rat-tat-tatted on Halliburton's tax loopholes and deals with Saddam Hussein, Libya and Iraq.


Cheney coolly accused him of "trying to throw up a smokescreen" and making charges that are false. He then directed viewers to go to http://www.factcheck.com for the truth.

Trouble is, that website is owned by billionaire philanthropist George Soros, who has been bankrolling the anti-Bush movement. Ironically, the site is headed "Why we should not re-elect President Bush."

So Cheney couldn't even get that straight.

What he was really referring to is www.factcheck.org, maintained by the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Still, it only deals with charges that Cheney continued to profit from Halliburton, which won no-bid contracts for the reconstruction of Iraq, after he was elected. Meanwhile, the allegation that his company did business with the so-called "axis of evil" remains undisputed.


You have to hand it to him: He's got, um, nerves of steel.


Meanwhile, Edwards stayed on message, and stayed the course of acting as attack dog, nipping away at the Bush-Cheney record in a way that presidential candidate John Kerry could not last Thursday. That's because he was going head-to-head with the president ? and in the current political climate, it would probably not be a good tactic to be seen attacking George W. Bush.


So Kerry was left acting "presidential" and statesman-like while Edwards made full use of his 20 years of trial lawyer experience, making the case over and over again, almost to the point of overkill, that the Bush-Cheney crew messed up on everything from tax cuts to health costs and, especially, the war in Iraq.


Of course, Cheney kept honing in on the "experience gap" that Edwards, who has yet to complete his first Senate term, has.


In perhaps the most awkward blooper of the evening, Cheney told Edwards to his face that they had never met before the debate, despite evidence they had. Edwards' campaign later provided a transcript of a February 2001 prayer breakfast at which Cheney began his remarks by acknowledging the North Carolina senator. The campaign also said Cheney, in his capacity as Senate president, had sworn in Edwards.


Cheney was trying to make the point that Edwards was an absentee senator.


But, when Cheney compared his administration's experience with that of the Kerry-Edwards' team, Edwards had the ready comebacks: "Mr. Vice-President, I don't think the country can take four more years of this kind of experience."


Whether that kind of political sniping will register with voters will be revealed in the polls. But what was revealing of the media was what CNN did right after the debate. Instead of performing the promised "fact-checking" on Cheney's claims, anchor Wolf Blitzer asked campaign operatives to comment on the vice-president's charges that Edwards lacked experience.


Later, when correspondent Bill Schneider showed up to actually check a few facts, he zeroed in on Edwards' assertion, which was also made by Kerry last week, that 90 per cent of the coalition casualties suffered in Iraq were American casualties.


Schneider found Edwards' contention not quite accurate ? while avoiding Cheney's lies.


Which is why American viewers should be pathetically grateful for The Daily Show With Jon Stewart: It the only program that consistently rewinds the tape to expose the lies and the liars who spout them.

And it's supposed to be the "fake news show."

© 2004 The Toronto Star
 
LOL this is a great quote by someone online:

Cheney was also every inch the "snarling, hunch-shouldered golem" that has made him one of the least popular politicians in recent memory.

""snarling, hunch-shouldered golem"" LOL
 
Hope I'm not interrupting your little DNC rally here...

Here's a decent audio report on facts on both sides from NPR this morning...

Text

It seems that Edwards was a little loose with "facts" as well.
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Hope I'm not interrupting your little DNC rally here...

Here's a decent audio report on facts on both sides from NPR this morning...

Text

It seems that Edwards was a little loose with "facts" as well.


The "snarling, hunch-shouldered golem" made worse lies and more lies. More importantly he failed to respond to multiple questions.
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Hope I'm not interrupting your little DNC rally here...

Here's a decent audio report on facts on both sides from NPR this morning...

Text

It seems that Edwards was a little loose with "facts" as well.

Who cares about facts at this point? Really. Both side lie out their asses. It just seems that one sides lies sure lead to a lot more deaths than the other side 🙁
 
Back
Top