Diabetes type 2 and soda

blodhi74

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2003
4,566
1
0
just read an interesting artical on a study done over the past 8 years about people drinking 1 soda a day increasing their risk of getting type 2 Diabetes by 80% ...... and the people drinking soda on regular basis gained 18 pounds a year ( all things like exercise and diet was taken into account ) the artical calls soda liquid candy ..... 1 can contains same sugar levels as 2 hershey bars .... the sugar is absorbed by the system rapidly since it is in liquid form and stresses the spleen

:shocked:
 

OverVolt

Lifer
Aug 31, 2002
14,278
89
91
Yea i try not to drink lots of soda, i drink gatorade when im rele thirsty, which is about 1/4th the sugar of soda, or i drink water. I have a soda from time to time but it's too sweet for me, i don't like sweet food.
 

blodhi74

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2003
4,566
1
0
last few months I have replaced soda with ice tea with lemon and cold water ..... dont feel like having a soda any more :)
 

UglyCasanova

Lifer
Mar 25, 2001
19,275
1,361
126
Originally posted by: blodhi74
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
I drink like 5 or 6 soda's a day, and have been for 3 to 4 years.

:shocked:

I know. I need to cut back but I guess it's just a habit. When I'm thirsty, I drink either a Dr Pepper or a Sunkist (and sometimes some A&W root beer).
 

klah

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2002
7,070
1
0
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29434-2004Aug24.html

A Regular Soda a Day Boosts Weight Gain
Non-Diet Drinks Also Increase Risk of Diabetes, Study Shows

The study of more than 50,000 U.S. nurses found that those who drank just one serving of soda or fruit punch a day tended to gain much more weight than those who drank less than one a month, and had more than an 80 percent increased risk of developing Type 2 diabetes,
 

Bryophyte

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
13,430
13
81
It's the high fructose corn syrup. That stuff is poison to the human body. Cheap sh1t they're filling "convenience" foods with.
 

myusername

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2003
5,046
0
0
Originally posted by: Bryophyte
It's the high fructose corn syrup. That stuff is poison to the human body. Cheap sh1t they're filling "convenience" foods with.
Is this hyperbole, or does the human body have a rougher time with it than e.g. cane sugar? Would be interested in any articles if you got em.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
bullpucky. if a soda a day was enough, coffee/fruit juices etc would all screw you too. eating any carbs blah. only thing those studies show is that people who drink a lot of soda are more likely to do a whole lotta other things that contribute to the risk factors:p
 

klah

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2002
7,070
1
0
The risk pertained to drinks sweetened with either sugar or high-fructose corn syrup.

Anyone who cares about their health or the health of their family would not consume these beverages
 

Bryophyte

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
13,430
13
81
Originally posted by: myusername
Originally posted by: Bryophyte
It's the high fructose corn syrup. That stuff is poison to the human body. Cheap sh1t they're filling "convenience" foods with.
Is this hyperbole, or does the human body have a rougher time with it than e.g. cane sugar? Would be interested in any articles if you got em.

I need to do more research on this myself. I've read somewhere that our bodies don't handle high fructose corn syrup the same way we respond to cane sugar. I'll post what I learn when I've learned more.
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
These studies go back and forth. Remember when nutrasweet came out...it was "safe" and didn't have the cancer causing affects of saccharin...now it turns out they do. There are studies every day that say something is bad, then a little while later they figure out they were wrong. I remember the whole ALAR and apples thing...it was so bad to eat apples, now it's bunk. They use to say eggs were bad, now it turns out they are good.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
yea, butter was bad, now its good. margerine was good, but now its bad with its transfats and all.

eat less doesn't grab attention as a headline:p
 

Falloutboy

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2003
5,916
0
76
Originally posted by: blodhi74
last few months I have replaced soda with ice tea with lemon and cold water ..... dont feel like having a soda any more :)

did the same thing was at 2-3 big slams of mountain dew's a day in highschool. I wised up last year and droped pop all together and went to ice tea. froped like 40 pounds over the first 8 mounths. I've leveld off now that i'm 21 now that I"ve discoverd bear (proubly should just do hard liquire so I get the buzz and not the calories
 

Yo Ma Ma

Lifer
Jan 21, 2000
11,635
2
0
Originally posted by: Bryophyte
Originally posted by: myusername
Originally posted by: Bryophyte
It's the high fructose corn syrup. That stuff is poison to the human body. Cheap sh1t they're filling "convenience" foods with.
Is this hyperbole, or does the human body have a rougher time with it than e.g. cane sugar? Would be interested in any articles if you got em.

I need to do more research on this myself. I've read somewhere that our bodies don't handle high fructose corn syrup the same way we respond to cane sugar. I'll post what I learn when I've learned more.

Yeah, I read that also. Something to the effect that we process the HFCS more like a fat than a sugar.. I'm not sure why that is bad, but apparently it is.
 

klah

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2002
7,070
1
0
Originally posted by: Insane3D
These studies go back and forth. Remember when nutrasweet came out...it was "safe" and didn't have the cancer causing affects of saccharin...now it turns out they do. There are studies every day that say something is bad, then a little while later they figure out they were wrong. I remember the whole ALAR and apples thing...it was so bad to eat apples, now it's bunk. They use to say eggs were bad, now it turns out they are good.

NutraSweet causes cancer? Link? Why is it still FDA approved? :roll:

Eggs are good? 200mg cholesterol each is good? :roll:
 
Aug 17, 2004
106
0
0
Originally posted by: Insane3D
These studies go back and forth. Remember when nutrasweet came out...it was "safe" and didn't have the cancer causing affects of saccharin...now it turns out they do. There are studies every day that say something is bad, then a little while later they figure out they were wrong. I remember the whole ALAR and apples thing...it was so bad to eat apples, now it's bunk. They use to say eggs were bad, now it turns out they are good.

Nutrasweet (aspartame) has been proven perfectly fine for the general population (PKU patients excluded) in many independant studies.

Worried about the phenylalanine that's produced when aspartame is broken down?
Only 62mg are contained in 8oz of diet coke. Likewise, 8oz of milk contains over 400mg, and 3 oz of chizen contains over 1,000mg.

Worried about the methanol that's produced?
The metabolizing of many fruits produces more methanol than the metabolizing of aspartame. Methanol, in small amount, does absolutely no harm to the body.

The only bad thing about aspartame is the unfounded rumors.

EDIT: Oh, and the American Cancer Society disagrees with your claim that aspartame cause cancer.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
56,564
16,456
146

Whoops! Yep, looks like BS.

Again, another attempt to blame foods for the nations obesity problem falls flat on it's face.

Folks, sugary drinks and high fat foods were the NORM for 50+ years before the Obesity epidemic started. (High fat foods for hundreds of years) In fact, the obesity epidemic started at the same time low fat diets became popular and diet drinks were introduced.

It has FAR less to do with the types of foods we eat, than it has to do with our lifestyles. Our daily activities are FAR more sedentary and that in turn leads to far more munching.

America needs to get off it's ass and realize it needs to get off it's ass.