Wondering if someone could maybe throw me a bone on running DFS in a mixed-mode environment. My first question I guess is about namespaces. If i got 3 servers for example, and share_s1, share_s2, share_s3, on a 2003 R2, 2003 and 2000 server, is the proper way to set things up to do it on the R2 server? ie:
2003 R2\DFSNameSpace\share_s1
2003 R2\DFSNameSpace\share_s2
2003 R2\DFSNameSpace\share_s3
I'm just trying to understand the concept. If that's right, is there a difference between setting up the namespace on the R2 server or the other 2 servers? Aside from using the most up to date O/S?
My other concern was replication. It would seem for large shares you would need both quite a bit of space and to use DFS (not FRS) for replication you'd need 2003 R2 on any machines doing replication--but this is completely separate from the namespaces I'm assuming. But could i set it up like if i had 6 servers, 2 being R2, and the rest not
2003_R2_s1
- namespace_1 ( share_2003_R2, share_2003, share_2000)
2003_R2_s2
- namespace_2 ( share_2003_R2, share_2003, share_2000)
And have the R2 servers replicating each others namespace, would that work properly? I'm not sure if i have a firm grasp on the DFS thing, or more so the changes in 2003 R2.
Any confirmations/suggestions/responses are appreciated. 🙂
2003 R2\DFSNameSpace\share_s1
2003 R2\DFSNameSpace\share_s2
2003 R2\DFSNameSpace\share_s3
I'm just trying to understand the concept. If that's right, is there a difference between setting up the namespace on the R2 server or the other 2 servers? Aside from using the most up to date O/S?
My other concern was replication. It would seem for large shares you would need both quite a bit of space and to use DFS (not FRS) for replication you'd need 2003 R2 on any machines doing replication--but this is completely separate from the namespaces I'm assuming. But could i set it up like if i had 6 servers, 2 being R2, and the rest not
2003_R2_s1
- namespace_1 ( share_2003_R2, share_2003, share_2000)
2003_R2_s2
- namespace_2 ( share_2003_R2, share_2003, share_2000)
And have the R2 servers replicating each others namespace, would that work properly? I'm not sure if i have a firm grasp on the DFS thing, or more so the changes in 2003 R2.
Any confirmations/suggestions/responses are appreciated. 🙂