Drakkon
Diamond Member
Recently our boss took an "early retirement" and in turn it left us with no leadership. The "interim" person put in place has left it up to the team to decide how to structure themselves - with the one stipulation - no one person can be put "in charge" of everyone and all projects. The only teams I have ever been in always had a lead of some sort - not sure how you can function efficiently without one. Two team meetings and we are no closer to a decision seems like.
Looking for some ideas on how to structure something like this. I work in a shop that develops small educational simulations and graphics - mostly deal with flash and graphics - very small projects never taking more than a week. We have 4 main proposals so far - All (7 of us - graphics, animators, programmers) must be present when any project is proposed, vote on a council of 2 to take the "lead" role on all projects, free for all (whoever is first to the project takes the lead on it), or assign each team member a subset of areas (i.e one person handles flash programming, another web programming, another illustrations, another photos, another database, etc) to cover and "lead" on.
Looking for some ideas on how to structure something like this. I work in a shop that develops small educational simulations and graphics - mostly deal with flash and graphics - very small projects never taking more than a week. We have 4 main proposals so far - All (7 of us - graphics, animators, programmers) must be present when any project is proposed, vote on a council of 2 to take the "lead" role on all projects, free for all (whoever is first to the project takes the lead on it), or assign each team member a subset of areas (i.e one person handles flash programming, another web programming, another illustrations, another photos, another database, etc) to cover and "lead" on.