Developers are purposefully hamstringing PC versions of games.

Status
Not open for further replies.

futurefields

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2012
6,470
32
91
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-lego-the-hobbit-face-off

"The PS4 game offers up a 1920x1280 image vertically super-sampled down to 1080p, providing extra anti-aliasing in the process, while Xbox One operates natively in 1080p and PC can do that and more. All three utilise similar forms of post-process anti-aliasing, although coverage seems to be a tad spottier on the PC in certain areas."

Why on earth would the anti-aliasing be WORSE on the PC version? That makes absolutely NO sense other than a design choice to make the console versions superior.

"Once again it's up to the PC version to provide the main differences, although as with recent next-gen Lego titles, it's not always for the positive reasons you might anticipate. In fact, there are a number of effects that either appear to be pared back or removed on PC. The reasons for this aren't always clear, but one cause could be the developers supporting older GPUs that predate the latest DirectX 11 feature-set, with newer effects hacked in to work using an older API and running into problems as a result. (The minimum requirements show support for DX10, along with the Nvidia GeForce 7600 GS or ATI Radeon X1950 Pro graphics cards.) Either way, it means that PC owners see some small but curious graphical differences."



"So, it's perhaps unsurprising that once again we find camera and object blur are dialled back, while screen-space ambient occlusion seems to be entirely absent. Interestingly, checking the game's 'pcconfig.txt' file shows that SSAO is enabled by default, even though there is little evidence to suggest it in practice. Some ambient occlusion is baked onto the textures, though, which means that environments still benefit from a little indirect shadowing and the extra depth this provides.

Curiously, shadows are rendered in a lower resolution than on consoles too, and there are also a few instances where certain details appear scaled back on the PC - such as the reduction in the level of grass located in a few locations. However, if we look more closely it seems as though the grass has simply sunk into the ground, leading some of the small shoots to disappear, which seems like a rendering or geometry error more than a deliberate reduction."

"Slightly lower-quality level-of-detail models are also used for the characters. Up close the smooth contours of the Lego Minifigures appear a little blocky around their claw-like hands compared to PS4 and Xbox One, while the textures feature UV mapping errors where the 2D artwork isn't wrapped across the geometry correctly."



Why are they doing this???



Stop trolling the Console Forum.

Anandtech Adminstrator
KeithTalent
 
Last edited by a moderator:

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Because they are not a priority for games like this. Lego games are mainly made for consoles. PC is second class citizen for most ports. Goes back to the other thread about PC gaming not being how it used to be and an advantage for console.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,027
5,913
126
i write all of my mobile apps in iOS and then port them to Android.

reason being?

there is more money to be made on iOS than Android (and i make 6-7 times more on iOS and Android). if there is a little something that isn't as polished on Android i don't care as much as i do on iOS, and the reason is simply because there is more money to be made on iOS so more time is put into it.

sounds like this is the same thing with the console and pc games - much more money to be made on console than pc, so more time is put into console and it's ported over to pc.
 

futurefields

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2012
6,470
32
91
sounds like this is the same thing with the console and pc games - much more money to be made on console than pc, so more time is put into console and it's ported over to pc.

not just ported over, but stripped of graphics in the process.

I mean it has less graphics than the Xbone versioN! :rolleyes:
 

ImpulsE69

Lifer
Jan 8, 2010
14,946
1,077
126
This isn't news. I've been talking about this for over a month. It is the one big thing that annoys me about the new gen consoles. It may not make alot of difference up front, but give it a few years, and it will be interesting to see the difference in quality between multiplatform games and exclusives.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,027
5,913
126
This isn't news. I've been talking about this for over a month. It is the one big thing that annoys me about the new gen consoles. It may not make alot of difference up front, but give it a few years, and it will be interesting to see the difference in quality between multiplatform games and exclusives.

the thing is, the devs target audience (consoles) doesn't give a crap about that one bit.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Is this still a big secret to most people? This has been going on at least as early as the original Halo. PC version delayed and made to run horrible to make Xbox brand look good.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
452
126
I'm surprised that this thread is even in this forum. Seems like it belongs in the PC section.

my thoughts too

this doesn't have anything to do with consoles, other than people pointing fingers at them... and they just need to quit whining
 

Wingznut

Elite Member
Dec 28, 1999
16,968
2
0
I'm surprised that this thread is even in this forum. Seems like it belongs in the PC section.
Perhaps... If the OP wanted to have an actual discussion. But, like every other one of his threads, he just wants to put down and argue with console owners.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.