The
Ars Technica review has been posted. They have some very good things to say about this game.
Also, these are the, err,
flaws they listed in "The Bad" and "The Ugly":
The Bad
- The transitions between the game and its cutscenes can be jarring
- The voice acting can be spotty in places
- The conspiracy can get a little thick at times, and a lot is thrown at you near the end of the game
- I experienced a few crashes while playing on the PC, causing me to save more often than I would have otherwise
The Ugly
- The game has a quick-save ability, and I admit to using it every now and again, but abusing saves to see the "right" way through conversations will harm your enjoyment of the game. The "Ugly" tag is for people too cowardly to live by their own in-game decisions. And I mean that in a nice way.
- An early mission in a police station can be exceedingly tedious if you tackle it at the wrong time, which is a design flaw in a game of this type
So, based on this metric:
I buy games based on what forum say on the day of release.
Major whining about irrelevant details = GOTY
Fanboys excusing major holes = AVOID
...this game must be pretty amazing. I mean, look at the review. They're complaining about having a quicksave feature, for godsake.