Can't say I've really used it (seen a couple companies advertising they use it though), so I can't speak one way or the other.
At least you got worked out.
Haha thanks a lot for the suggestion! I've just gotten a bit bitter over the years of dealing with MS enterprise licensing and etc.
Typical MS order of operation:
1) Buy smallish software company, change a few logos in the software and make it dirt cheap or free
2) Add features, charge a tiny amount and 'push' everyone into upgrading.
3) Severely neutering 'free' version then releasing a '$$$$$$$' version which forces everyone enticed by free/low-cost into upgrading.
I.E. DPM, MOSS/WSS, almost everything MS has done other than Office and Windows.