Younigue
Diamond Member
- Feb 5, 2017
- 5,888
- 1,446
- 106
Doofus.For a second there I thought you were talking about Democrats and Trump. Nevermind. lol
Doofus.For a second there I thought you were talking about Democrats and Trump. Nevermind. lol
The Dems foolishly egged him on. When Starr concluded there was nothing to the Whitewater deal the Dems pulled a juvenile "told you so". Starr got pissed and decided to keep the investigation open.Hired to investigate some real estates deal and instead looks into Clinton's bedroom. That is the problem with special counsels, what they are hired to investigate often turns into a political witch hunt.
wow, it sounds like you actually believe something so fucking stupid as this. How did you allow this to happen to yourself?
"Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press" I missed the part where he asked the Russians to hack. He said it was up to the current President to tell foreign governments to hack in response to the reporter's question. Try again.
What DNC hack? You mean the one where no one could investigate it?So, uhh, how would the Russians find the requested emails other than by hacking?
The part he didn't mention was that his campaign would be mightily rewarded, as well. They were, of course, by the hacks of the DNC & Podesta's emails....
What DNC hack? You mean the one where no one could investigate it?
So lame. That investigation predates the appointment of Mueller-
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ssian-officials-in-dnc-hack-wsj-idUSKBN1D21MI
And it's a damn good thing these "true patriots" had an "insurance policy". /sThese agents are true patriots. If only the Republican Party could have saved themselves and the country from such a toxic candidate.
/queue Hillary deflection...
And it's a damn good thing these "patriots" had an "insurance policy". /s
Don't you even have the slightest curiosity as to the "insurance policy" they were referring to in that meeting with McCabe?Of course the only problem with that is that there's literally zero evidence that anything improper has occurred.
To see just how insane the standard that Republicans are trying to use is, replace Trump with a mob boss. (it's easier than you think, haha!) Imagine if it surfaced that FBI agents had sent texts back and forth talking about what a scumbag the mob boss was. What would the reaction be? 'No shit', I imagine. No one would be saying that because the FBI held this mobster in low esteem that their investigation was improper, yet that's exactly what Republicans are trying to do here.
It's an attempt at an ideological purge of investigators who don't like Trump. This is the sort of thing dictatorships commonly do. We should be outraged, but at the Republicans for attempting to purge unfriendly government officials.
Don't you even have the slightest curiosity as to the "insurance policy" they were referring to in that meeting with McCabe?
Don't you even have the slightest curiosity as to the "insurance policy" they were referring to in that meeting with McCabe?
Looks like GOP has corrupted the DOJ too. Everything they touch is corrupted. SCOTUS, FCC, DOJ, EPA.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/14/justice-department-mueller-investigation-295483
You brought up the hacks.
Breaking into someones server to retrieve anything is hacking or are you too stupid to know that definition."Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press" I missed the part where he asked the Russians to hack. He said it was up to the current President to tell foreign governments to hack in response to the reporter's question. Try again.