• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Depth & Breadth of Experience Governing a State with A Whopping Population of 862,000?

D

dudleydocker

Golden Member
Seems to me that while he was a Governor, one must take into account the scale of the operations managed. Heck, there are probably 600,000 people within a 15 mile radius here!

Just a thought....
 
Originally posted by: dudleydocker
Seems to me that while he was a Governor, one must take into account the scale of the operations managed. Heck, there are probably 600,000 people within a 15 mile radius here!

Just a thought....
Click to expand...

Hmmm, one must take into the account the old saying "Things are bigger in Texas", Bush has taken that to a whole new level. How's that for thought :Q
 
Probably 30+ mayors that have more responsibility 😉

Even a couple of CEO's 😉

It's just fun to bash dean and watch all the YABB's come out to play. But I'd rather judge him by his positions than by the population of his state.
 
Say what you like in Dean's defense, but this guy is completely unelectable.

You would think that the Dems would have learned from the McGovern incident, but apparently not.
 
Hmmm, one must take into the account the old saying "Things are bigger in Texas", Bush has taken that to a whole new level. How's that for thought
Click to expand...

Seems that when one doesn't have a defensable response the only option is to go on the attack......
 
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate
Say what you like in Dean's defense, but this guy is completely unelectable.

You would think that the Dems would have learned from the McGovern incident, but apparently not.
Click to expand...

"but this guy is completely unelectable."

That's what people said about Jimmy Carter too.

 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate Say what you like in Dean's defense, but this guy is completely unelectable. You would think that the Dems would have learned from the McGovern incident, but apparently not.
Click to expand...
"but this guy is completely unelectable." That's what people said about Jimmy Carter too.
Click to expand...

Carter was not a socialist. Big difference.

Are you going to ignore the similarities between McGovern and Dean's candidacies?

Both were anti-war. Both were crazy lefties. One was trounced by an embattled president. The other is next.
 
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate Say what you like in Dean's defense, but this guy is completely unelectable. You would think that the Dems would have learned from the McGovern incident, but apparently not.
Click to expand...
"but this guy is completely unelectable." That's what people said about Jimmy Carter too.
Click to expand...

Carter was not a socialist. Big difference.

Are you going to ignore the similarities between McGovern and Dean's candidacies?

Both were anti-war. Both were crazy lefties. One was trounced by an embattled president. The other is next.
Click to expand...

alright I'll bite what's a socialist? And how is dean one?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top