Demo'd a Ducati Monster 1100 S today.

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Man, what a great bike!

I took the bike down Valley Parkway past Lake Hodges a little while ago, this bike turns in well, has plenty of power and is light and flickable. It is partly cloudy and in the low 70s here, perfect riding weather.

Specs:

2009 Ducati Monster 1100 S
1100cc L-Twin engine, 2 valves per cylinder
370lbs dry weight
Ohlins adjustable forks and rear shock
Brembo brakes (twin 4 piston calipers up front)

First thing I noticed is that the handlebars are a bit wider than on my SV and the riding position is a bit more aggressive (forward leaning). The seat is angled towards the tank which facilitates a weight forward riding position (which is good because this bike will lift the front wheel easily under acceleration). Controls are standard layout and were easy to use with gloves on.

The engine is lumpy at idle with quite a bit of vibration but once above 3,000 rpms it really smooths out. The engine is so sweet and the sounds it makes when you get up above 5,000 rpms are soooo nice. What a great power plant. Gobs of torque and it just revs so willingly. I didn't take it up past 7,000 rpms because the bike only had 100 miles on it but it was pulling strong when I shifted and I was already breaking the 55mph speed limit by a good 20mph.

There was one point where I started out from a light and got on the throttle and was quickly rewarded with a nice wheelie. I probably had a good foot of air under my front wheel.

I want one! Badly! :D This is my next bike...no doubt about it.
 

Saga

Banned
Feb 18, 2005
2,718
1
0
Owned a 1098 before my ZX10R. The Duc is, hands down, a superior handling and more comfortable to ride motorcycle. However, I tend to favor my riding more towards track and performance-oriented goals, as opposed to sitting around on my bike trying to look cool for the ladies. Those two bikes were designed with two completely different riders in mind - the guy who actually wants to go fast is going to pick up the ZX10R. The guy who's been riding cruisers his entire life and is too snobby to ride a traditional super sport (Suzi, Kawi, Honda, Yamaha liter bikes) will gravitate more towards the Ducati or BMW bikes - I tend to see it as much of an image thing as the Harley guys that won't even ride their bike if it's raining, or if their Harley t-shirt is dirty.

In the end, I didn't want to be one of those guys. I ride for speed, and the 18+ HP difference in the ZX10R eventually made me sell my Duc for it. Now, if money was no object, it would have been a different matter, and I'd own both.. but for now I'm totally content with the ZX10R for track days and the Yamaha Warrior for roadside riding.

Cheers, though, if you pick one of those up. They're great bikes. :thumbsup:
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Originally posted by: Saga
Owned a 1098 before my ZX10R. The Duc is, hands down, a superior handling and more comfortable to ride motorcycle. However, I tend to favor my riding more towards track and performance-oriented goals, as opposed to sitting around on my bike trying to look cool for the ladies. Those two bikes were designed with two completely different riders in mind - the guy who actually wants to go fast is going to pick up the ZX10R. The guy who's been riding cruisers his entire life and is too snobby to ride a traditional super sport (Suzi, Kawi, Honda, Yamaha liter bikes) will gravitate more towards the Ducati or BMW bikes - I tend to see it as much of an image thing as the Harley guys that won't even ride their bike if it's raining, or if their Harley t-shirt is dirty.

In the end, I didn't want to be one of those guys. I ride for speed, and the 18+ HP difference in the ZX10R eventually made me sell my Duc for it. Now, if money was no object, it would have been a different matter, and I'd own both.. but for now I'm totally content with the ZX10R for track days and the Yamaha Warrior for roadside riding.

Cheers, though, if you pick one of those up. They're great bikes. :thumbsup:

You make it sound as though guys who ride those bikes just have them for show and/or don't know how to ride...which is ridiculous. I ride hard and I enjoy riding the twisties. I put 5,000 miles on my SV since last April and when I get my next bike it's not going to be a garage queen. It will get ridden just as frequently and just as hard.

Honestly, the reason I gravitate towards bikes like the Ducati Monster and the Triumph Speed/Street Triple is BECAUSE it's not just another Jap bike. I don't care if it has 10 less hp or 50 less hp than a Jap SS bike.

I bet I can ride my SV faster in the canyons than half the guys who own super sport bikes anyway. The Monster would just be a step up from my current canyon carver. More power, better suspension and better brakes while keeping true to the lightweight excellent chassis with gobs of usable power.

I don't need or want a bike that can hit 100mph in first gear and 150mph 1/4 mile times. Honestly, I don't want a 1098 either.

To me the Monster fits my needs perfectly.
 

Saga

Banned
Feb 18, 2005
2,718
1
0
Get defensive about it all you want, the reality is that the majority of cruiser riders I've ever met (note: that owned bikes less than two years old, the hard-core guys tend to own 10-20+ year old bikes!) are fucking doctors, lawyers, dentists, and all other forms of weekend warriors with too much disposable income and no actual riding skill. To them, it's all about image.

Regardless, I'd rather own a Jap bike simply because the damn thing will last me far longer without falling apart, and takes WAY better to performance parts - probably primarily because there is an actual market to make aftermarket parts for the Jap bikes with how many there are. ;) Someday we should meet. I could probably school you on any bike you own on the '85 Nighthawk 750S Turbo shaft-driven cruiser I have in pieces in my garage once it's re-assembled when it comes to these "twisties" you refer to.

Seriously though, I love your opinions and all but typically you just like to rant about something, be it SUV driver's, or whatever. Ride safe.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Originally posted by: Saga
Get defensive about it all you want, the reality is that the majority of cruiser riders I've ever met (note: that owned bikes less than two years old, the hard-core guys tend to own 10-20+ year old bikes!) are fucking doctors, lawyers, dentists, and all other forms of weekend warriors with too much disposable income and no actual riding skill. To them, it's all about image.

Regardless, I'd rather own a Jap bike simply because the damn thing will last me far longer without falling apart, and takes WAY better to performance parts - probably primarily because there is an actual market to make aftermarket parts for the Jap bikes with how many there are. ;) Someday we should meet. I could probably school you on any bike you own on the '85 Nighthawk 750S Turbo shaft-driven cruiser I have in pieces in my garage once it's re-assembled when it comes to these "twisties" you refer to.

Seriously though, I love your opinions and all but typically you just like to rant about something, be it SUV driver's, or whatever. Ride safe.

Maybe...then again, you might be surprised. I never claimed I could beat anybody but I have been able to hang with some pretty experienced riders without much difficulty.

And I wasn't being defensive. I simply think you have some disdain toward guys who ride anything that isn't a Japanese super sport and you really shouldn't. I've met all kinds of riders from guys on custom choppers to guys on SVs and we all share a common bond...a love of motorcycles and riding.

Don't be so quick to judge.
 

melijak

Senior member
Aug 5, 2004
219
0
0
I used owned ZX9R for 5 years and loved it. Then I discovered Italian bikes and could never go back to jap bikes again. The difference in riding enjoyment is huge, the V-twins rock! The only bike that come close for me are Triumph speed triple.
By the way, the bike's soul that changed me, belonged to Aprilia Falco 1000cc

 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Originally posted by: melijak
I used owned ZX9R for 5 years and loved it. Then I discovered Italian bikes and could never go back to jap bikes again. The difference in riding enjoyment is huge, the V-twins rock! The only bike that come close for me are Triumph speed triple.
By the way, the bike's soul that changed me, belonged to Aprilia Falco 1000cc

Yeah, I feel fortunate that I was able to demo this bike. Many motorcycle dealers won't let you test ride at all and the ones that do frequently only let you ride it around the parking lot. These guys said go up the road, take a right and head out Valley Parkway past Lake Hodges which has some elevation change and some mild turns but it's a 55mph road so you can really open it up if there's no traffic.

I was gone for a good 15-20 minutes. I enjoyed it.

Kudos to Moto Forza in Escondido. I'll definitely buy my Ducati from them when the time comes. :thumbsup:
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
34
91
Originally posted by: Saga
Get defensive about it all you want, the reality is that the majority of cruiser riders I've ever met (note: that owned bikes less than two years old, the hard-core guys tend to own 10-20+ year old bikes!) are fucking doctors, lawyers, dentists, and all other forms of weekend warriors with too much disposable income and no actual riding skill. To them, it's all about image.

God forbid people want to enjoy a long ride on a sunny day without riding like a squid. If you don't like cruisers, don't buy one. But cut the class warfare BS. Who gives a shit if someone's a doctor, lawyer, or dentist? Really, the whole "ride hard or go home" crap that I hear from so many zip-splats is every bit as much "image" as anything the "weekend warrior" crowd does.

Every set of bikers has it's own little BS clique. The sportbikers mock the cruisers. The cruisers mock the sportbikers and Goldwings. Big Twin riders mock Sportster riders. The custom crowd mocks anyone who rides anything that so much as looks stock. It goes on and on and it's never anything more than self-pleasuring.

Just because someone doesn't want to be dragging a knee through every goddamn corner doesn't mean they're less of a biker. Just because someone doesn't want to arrive at work drenched doesn't mean they're less of a biker.

Likewise (for the cruiser crowd), just because someone wants to drag a knee through every corner doesn't make them less of a biker. And just because someone has a full bodysuit that matches their bike doesn't mean they're less of a biker.

Originally posted by: Saga
Regardless, I'd rather own a Jap bike simply because the damn thing will last me far longer without falling apart, and takes WAY better to performance parts - probably primarily because there is an actual market to make aftermarket parts for the Jap bikes with how many there are. ;)

The guys I grew up around who rode got well over 100,000 miles out of their Harleys. Even the 1970's and 1980's era Harleys. I'd say that qualifies quite easily as "lasting a long time without falling apart". As far as performance parts, apples to oranges. How many "performance" parts are there for a Honda Shadow compared to a CBR1000RR? Of course there are more performance parts for sportbikes. Just like there are more touring parts for Goldwings.

Originally posted by: Saga
I could probably school you on any bike you own on the '85 Nighthawk 750S Turbo shaft-driven cruiser I have in pieces in my garage once it's re-assembled when it comes to these "twisties" you refer to.

A bike on the road is worth two in the garage.

Though the 750S Turbo in indeed an interesting bike. When did you import your 750S from Canada? (It was never sold in the US, the US got the 700S.) And how did you manage to custom mount the turbocharger? (Honda offered a turbocharged CX550 and CX650, but never offered a turbocharger on their Nighthawk, or CB, line.) I'm impressed with your level of ingenuity to create such an interesting one-off customization.

I'm also curious what you've done to that Canadian 750S to make it a "Cruiser", since Honda advertised it as a sportbike in its day, and magazine articles called it a sportbike without the "compromises in seating position and maintenance". (Motorcyclist, February 1984)

Then again, I own a Harley (one that is, gasp, only two years old), so you probably won't care about my opinion. We'll pretend for your sake that my 1982 CB450SC doesn't really exist.

ZV
 

Hyperlite

Diamond Member
May 25, 2004
5,664
2
76
Originally posted by: Saga
Owned a 1098 before my ZX10R. The Duc is, hands down, a superior handling and more comfortable to ride motorcycle. However, I tend to favor my riding more towards track and performance-oriented goals, as opposed to sitting around on my bike trying to look cool for the ladies. Those two bikes were designed with two completely different riders in mind - the guy who actually wants to go fast is going to pick up the ZX10R. The guy who's been riding cruisers his entire life and is too snobby to ride a traditional super sport (Suzi, Kawi, Honda, Yamaha liter bikes) will gravitate more towards the Ducati or BMW bikes - I tend to see it as much of an image thing as the Harley guys that won't even ride their bike if it's raining, or if their Harley t-shirt is dirty.

In the end, I didn't want to be one of those guys. I ride for speed, and the 18+ HP difference in the ZX10R eventually made me sell my Duc for it. Now, if money was no object, it would have been a different matter, and I'd own both.. but for now I'm totally content with the ZX10R for track days and the Yamaha Warrior for roadside riding.

Cheers, though, if you pick one of those up. They're great bikes. :thumbsup:

wow, you're shortsighted. I....i...i really don't want to get started on this. Casey Stoner mean anything to you?


edit: HA i found saga: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...er-bu...-guess-who-won
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
21,704
6,139
136
Originally posted by: Saga
Get defensive about it all you want, the reality is that the majority of cruiser riders I've ever met (note: that owned bikes less than two years old, the hard-core guys tend to own 10-20+ year old bikes!) are fucking doctors, lawyers, dentists, and all other forms of weekend warriors with too much disposable income and no actual riding skill. To them, it's all about image.

Regardless, I'd rather own a Jap bike simply because the damn thing will last me far longer without falling apart, and takes WAY better to performance parts - probably primarily because there is an actual market to make aftermarket parts for the Jap bikes with how many there are. ;) Someday we should meet. I could probably school you on any bike you own on the '85 Nighthawk 750S Turbo shaft-driven cruiser I have in pieces in my garage once it's re-assembled when it comes to these "twisties" you refer to.

Seriously though, I love your opinions and all but typically you just like to rant about something, be it SUV driver's, or whatever. Ride safe.

Seems to me you're the one that can't get past image. And you're also pretty defensive about your jap bikes.
I will grant you that a lot of guy's riding cruisers are indeed middle aged and reasonably successful. They also aren't stupid, they don't need to tear up the streets, and they have no desire to push the limits. I'm one of those guy's. When I decided to buy a bike there were no constraints, I could get anything I wanted and that's exactly what I did. I got a cruiser, and I love it. I also don't ride in the rain if I can avoid it, because it's uncomfortable, I have a truck and a car I can use when it rains. My bike is for pleasure. It's all about what I want it for and what I want to do with it.
It's a pity bikers like you are so narrow minded, I simply can't imagine why you want to make someone else feel bad about the bike they own or how they ride it. And that crap about "I'll show you how to ride" is nothing less than pathetic. Who the fuck are you to throw down that crap. Go spread your shit elsewhere, leave us accounts to enjoy our bikes.
 

FiLeZz

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2000
4,778
47
91
I have owned 16 motorcycles over the past 20 years.

I think I know how to ride.

The first 13 bikes I owned were JAP bikes.

The last 3 were Italian Ducati's

My current ride is a 2008-1098.

Only thing I would have in its place would be an 1198.

I could care less what anyone eles wants to ride. I have found the brand I like and am sticking to it. Not many motorcycles will pull a front wheel in 1st 2nd and 3rd with no clutch just giving the bike gas. The bike is a tourqe Moster.

 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
What is it's rollover rating, though?

I hear they end up on their side more often than cars.
 

FiLeZz

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2000
4,778
47
91
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
What is it's rollover rating, though?

I hear they end up on their side more often than cars.

I hope I never find out!
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
One thing I forgot to mention, the heat coming off the left side of the bike when stopped was almost unbearable. I had to stop for construction traffic and was sitting there idling for about 5 minutes and my left inner thigh was cooking. When I put my foot up on the peg it was fine but with it on the ground my leg got pretty warm. Leathers would no doubt help though, I was wearing jeans.

Otherwise the bike is perfect.
 

Saga

Banned
Feb 18, 2005
2,718
1
0
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt

Though the 750S Turbo in indeed an interesting bike. When did you import your 750S from Canada? (It was never sold in the US, the US got the 700S.) And how did you manage to custom mount the turbocharger? (Honda offered a turbocharged CX550 and CX650, but never offered a turbocharger on their Nighthawk, or CB, line.) I'm impressed with your level of ingenuity to create such an interesting one-off customization.

I'm also curious what you've done to that Canadian 750S to make it a "Cruiser", since Honda advertised it as a sportbike in its day, and magazine articles called it a sportbike without the "compromises in seating position and maintenance". (Motorcyclist, February 1984)

Then again, I own a Harley (one that is, gasp, only two years old), so you probably won't care about my opinion. We'll pretend for your sake that my 1982 CB450SC doesn't really exist.

ZV

Personally I consider anything shaft or belt driven a cruiser. My gearhead mentor runs a motocross company and has a 1800 square foot garage on his ranch with 20+ bikes in it, maybe 10 fully assembled ranging from cafe bikes to Goldwing-sized monstrosities. This particular bike was gifted to me by him many years ago as my first bike, under a "if you an reassemble it, you can have it" mentality of teaching. At the time it was just the frame of a S700 and a S750 engine. Prior to this, I was riding around on an 83 CX650C Turbo, and when I had succeeded in the task of re-assembly, he ported the engine and fabricated the turbo setup - I'm probably years away from that knowledge but I'd gladly give you his e-mail address if you'd like specifics, he's done lots of turbo configurations in his lifetime.

You appear to have misunderstood my intentions. Jules and I go back and forth on the Garage forum all the time for fun, it's purely in good sport and we pick on each other very frequently. While the majority of my blanket statements were very stereotypical, It genuinely wasn't my intention to make people angry as much as it was to tease Jules. By now I know just what to say to have a response by him highlighted, and he takes it in great sport every time.

Please appreciate that I stated my opinions based on my geographic location and did NOT intend for it to be inferred for the whole country, or the world. I've ridden from California to Miami and I've seen one extreme from the other to riding through snow in Colorado, and my statements were NOT intended to apply to everywhere - I'm simply slightly bitter this weekend because the things I said DO apply to riders here, unfortunately. I have three guys at work who ride Harley's. They will NOT ride if it's not 75+ and Sunny, and they will NOT ride if their Harley T-shirt and bandanna haven't been washed by their wife.

Personally, I've seen enough Harley's break down here within the first year due to various mechanical problems that I typically just count it up as American-made design flaws, and I admit that has me slightly jaded and I will NOT buy a Harley in the immediate future for any reason. Wouldn't stop me from buying another Duc, or getting a BMW bike if I had the cash.

In the end you have to appreciate that it's a local-specific argument for me. I live somewhere, currently, where it snows 6 months out of the year so the majority of the riders are simply midlife crisis Harley office workers with less than a thousand miles under their belt. Quite terrifying, actually.



Originally posted by: Greenman
Narrow-minded opinion, etc, etc..

Please see above.

Cheers, and ride safe.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Originally posted by: Saga
You appear to have misunderstood my intentions. Jules and I go back and forth on the Garage forum all the time for fun, it's purely in good sport and we pick on each other very frequently. While the majority of my blanket statements were very stereotypical, It genuinely wasn't my intention to make people angry as much as it was to tease Jules. By now I know just what to say to have a response by him highlighted, and he takes it in great sport every time.

Who are you again? :confused:
 

Saga

Banned
Feb 18, 2005
2,718
1
0
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Saga
You appear to have misunderstood my intentions. Jules and I go back and forth on the Garage forum all the time for fun, it's purely in good sport and we pick on each other very frequently. While the majority of my blanket statements were very stereotypical, It genuinely wasn't my intention to make people angry as much as it was to tease Jules. By now I know just what to say to have a response by him highlighted, and he takes it in great sport every time.

Who are you again? :confused:

I've gone through a few name changes. =P
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Originally posted by: Saga
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Saga
You appear to have misunderstood my intentions. Jules and I go back and forth on the Garage forum all the time for fun, it's purely in good sport and we pick on each other very frequently. While the majority of my blanket statements were very stereotypical, It genuinely wasn't my intention to make people angry as much as it was to tease Jules. By now I know just what to say to have a response by him highlighted, and he takes it in great sport every time.

Who are you again? :confused:

I've gone through a few name changes. =P

Do you think I'd recognize any of them? :p
 

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
34
91
Originally posted by: Saga
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt

Though the 750S Turbo in indeed an interesting bike. When did you import your 750S from Canada? (It was never sold in the US, the US got the 700S.) And how did you manage to custom mount the turbocharger? (Honda offered a turbocharged CX550 and CX650, but never offered a turbocharger on their Nighthawk, or CB, line.) I'm impressed with your level of ingenuity to create such an interesting one-off customization.

I'm also curious what you've done to that Canadian 750S to make it a "Cruiser", since Honda advertised it as a sportbike in its day, and magazine articles called it a sportbike without the "compromises in seating position and maintenance". (Motorcyclist, February 1984)

Then again, I own a Harley (one that is, gasp, only two years old), so you probably won't care about my opinion. We'll pretend for your sake that my 1982 CB450SC doesn't really exist.

ZV

Personally I consider anything shaft or belt driven a cruiser. My gearhead mentor runs a motocross company and has a 1800 square foot garage on his ranch with 20+ bikes in it, maybe 10 fully assembled ranging from cafe bikes to Goldwing-sized monstrosities. This particular bike was gifted to me by him many years ago as my first bike, under a "if you an reassemble it, you can have it" mentality of teaching. At the time it was just the frame of a S700 and a S750 engine. Prior to this, I was riding around on an 83 CX650C Turbo, and when I had succeeded in the task of re-assembly, he ported the engine and fabricated the turbo setup - I'm probably years away from that knowledge but I'd gladly give you his e-mail address if you'd like specifics, he's done lots of turbo configurations in his lifetime.

You appear to have misunderstood my intentions. Jules and I go back and forth on the Garage forum all the time for fun, it's purely in good sport and we pick on each other very frequently. While the majority of my blanket statements were very stereotypical, It genuinely wasn't my intention to make people angry as much as it was to tease Jules. By now I know just what to say to have a response by him highlighted, and he takes it in great sport every time.

Please appreciate that I stated my opinions based on my geographic location and did NOT intend for it to be inferred for the whole country, or the world. I've ridden from California to Miami and I've seen one extreme from the other to riding through snow in Colorado, and my statements were NOT intended to apply to everywhere - I'm simply slightly bitter this weekend because the things I said DO apply to riders here, unfortunately. I have three guys at work who ride Harley's. They will NOT ride if it's not 75+ and Sunny, and they will NOT ride if their Harley T-shirt and bandanna haven't been washed by their wife.

Personally, I've seen enough Harley's break down here within the first year due to various mechanical problems that I typically just count it up as American-made design flaws, and I admit that has me slightly jaded and I will NOT buy a Harley in the immediate future for any reason. Wouldn't stop me from buying another Duc, or getting a BMW bike if I had the cash.

In the end you have to appreciate that it's a local-specific argument for me. I live somewhere, currently, where it snows 6 months out of the year so the majority of the riders are simply midlife crisis Harley office workers with less than a thousand miles under their belt. Quite terrifying, actually.



Originally posted by: Greenman
Narrow-minded opinion, etc, etc..

Please see above.

Cheers, and ride safe.

Fair enough, though it might be a good idea in the future to somehow indicate that you're just poking fun. That's one of those things that tend to easily get lost in text.

And that turbo-ed 750S still sounds like a wicked cool bike. :)

I can't say that I understand your apparent preference for chain drive though. I can understand concerns about shaft-jacking or simply the extra weight of a shaft-drive compared to a chain or a belt on an all-out racebike but I don't see it being that much of a liability on a street bike. As far as belts, I'd take them over chains every day of the week and twice on Sundays. Lighter than a chain, just as strong, no lube, no stretch, less lash, and they'll last well over 100,000 miles. Buell has been using belts without issue for several years. Still, the simplicity of a chain is a benefit, and you can't exactly replace a belt at the side of the road as easily as you can a chain.

ZV
 

Saga

Banned
Feb 18, 2005
2,718
1
0
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Fair enough, though it might be a good idea in the future to somehow indicate that you're just poking fun. That's one of those things that tend to easily get lost in text.

And that turbo-ed 750S still sounds like a wicked cool bike. :)

I can't say that I understand your apparent preference for chain drive though. I can understand concerns about shaft-jacking or simply the extra weight of a shaft-drive compared to a chain or a belt on an all-out racebike but I don't see it being that much of a liability on a street bike. As far as belts, I'd take them over chains every day of the week and twice on Sundays. Lighter than a chain, just as strong, no lube, no stretch, less lash, and they'll last well over 100,000 miles. Buell has been using belts without issue for several years. Still, the simplicity of a chain is a benefit, and you can't exactly replace a belt at the side of the road as easily as you can a chain.

ZV

I've been around long enough to realize that some people just want to defend things for silly reasons. I find it most amusing when there are arguments based off opinions - thats something I've always found downright hilarious. If we were arguing about specific purposes of function where there is very little lee-way and there is typically a right and wrong answer, I'm the first person to admit when I've made a mistake and I'm usually extremely grateful for the information above all else, as thats my primary reason for frequenting forums such as this - to learn!

As for my opinions on the bike drive train styles, well I'm glad you inquired, ZV. Long story inc, feel free to skip the rest if you have a short attention span. Or maybe just the last two paragraphs or so.

As for the bikes, I'm not sure. Many years ago, I wasn't a bike person, and I didn't ever see myself becoming one. I always lived in climates where half the year it was snowing, and it never seemed to make a ton of sense to me to own something that was more or less useful 50% of the time you owned it for it's intended purpose. Then I got a job that required travel in warmer climates and my interests dud a 180.

Initially, the aforementioned friend in my previous post told me that I might be an extremely competent driver when it comes to four wheel drive vehicles, but that essentially meant jack shit for motorcycles, which were a whole different world of balance and maneuverability. Nonetheless I showed an interest, and when I was running around shopping for 600+cc bikes, he was determined not to let me make too many stupid mistakes along the way.

To explain, this is the type of friend where if you wanted him to show you something, say for example working on an engine, he'd sit you down in front of the engine, point to what you have to do, and give you a tool. He'd then work on something else for a while while you fucked up whatever task you were doing, and once he felt you had an appreciation for said task he'd sit you down and show you how to fix the damage you'd done and then show you how to do it right in the first place. The end result is he has a teaching method that typically humbles you and shows you a direct comparison of how things are done right, wrong, and how to fix mistakes all in one.

Now, as I mentioned before, said friend was determined not to let me go splat on a 100+HP bike with me having never ridden anything more powerful than a 75cc scooter. However, he has a REALLY sick sense of humor at the same time. So he handed me the keys to what was (at the time) a brand new GSX1300R 'Busa with 72 miles on the clock, gave me a lid and some gloves, and said "Go put 200 miles on this. If it comes back with a scratch on it, I'll beat your ass and make you fix it. If you manage not to drop it, we'll get you your own". The entire experience did, to this day, impact the fundamentals of just how powerful a bike can be. I will never own a 1300cc Super Sport for as long as I live, and after almost 10 years of riding I am just now getting comfortable with all aspects of riding a liter bike.

To make a VERY long story as short as possible, he gave me the CX650C mentioned before. It sure as hell didn't look like much, but I rode it for about 5,000 miles and got all of my retard mistakes out on it, such as experiencing gravel + brakes, water + thin tires, dropping it in a parking lot, in front of others, dropping it with it sitting on the kickstand while closing my garage, etc. After that I evolved to the Nighthawk - which is where I learned the fundamentals of powder coating. ;)

After driving the Nighthawk for almost two years I picked up a Z 750S, threw on a racing cast off for my first experiments with exhaust modifications and had my first experience with chain maintenance and upkeep. After owning that for a year or so I sold it and bought a ZX636. It seemed at this point I was after power, but didn't really know in what increments I would appreciate in the end - keeping in mind that remembering riding that Busa scared the shit out of a guy that only clocks in around 150lbs.

The next step up was in 07, which was a big jump for me. I sold the ZX636 and picked up a 1098 AND a Yamaha Warrior at the same time. That dealer probably loved me. This gave me the first experience owning a belt driven cruiser and riding a liter bike, which was a whole new world of fun - kind of like going from riding a manual 4 banger that you have to give gas and a little bit of 'oomph' to in order to make it go with clutch release, vs. driving something with power like a 3000GT or Corvette where you let out the clutch and it's already moving because it just wants to go. To date the warrior is probably the most comfortable bike I've ridden simply due to sitting upright again, which I haven't gotten to really do since the S750 (the Z750S doesn't count because it's a naked bike and is, for all intents and purposes, still a semi crouched riding position).

And now, having owned various bikes, I sold the 1098 and picked up a ZX10R for the speed factor, fully knowing that the Warrior could really only be upgraded to something silly like a Vmax (have you SEEN that thing? Ridiculous looking, but amazingly powerful) which is ultimately just more than I need. A quick breakdown is simply that to me, shaft driven tends to put too much of a weight imbalance on turns, and thats something I never truly got over. Chain driven is responsive, but requires maintenance - however these can be the most fun to ride around twisties and the power band response (albeit varying through all 3 styles) tends to feel smoothest to me on chain. As far as comfort goes, belt is sure as hell where it's at. Just wish I didn't have to worry if I should be wearing a kidney belt, those 48 degree v-twin's aren't THAT bad by any means, but you sure as hell notice after a long ride.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: Saga
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt

Though the 750S Turbo in indeed an interesting bike. When did you import your 750S from Canada? (It was never sold in the US, the US got the 700S.) And how did you manage to custom mount the turbocharger? (Honda offered a turbocharged CX550 and CX650, but never offered a turbocharger on their Nighthawk, or CB, line.) I'm impressed with your level of ingenuity to create such an interesting one-off customization.

I'm also curious what you've done to that Canadian 750S to make it a "Cruiser", since Honda advertised it as a sportbike in its day, and magazine articles called it a sportbike without the "compromises in seating position and maintenance". (Motorcyclist, February 1984)

Then again, I own a Harley (one that is, gasp, only two years old), so you probably won't care about my opinion. We'll pretend for your sake that my 1982 CB450SC doesn't really exist.

ZV

Personally I consider anything shaft or belt driven a cruiser. My gearhead mentor runs a motocross company and has a 1800 square foot garage on his ranch with 20+ bikes in it, maybe 10 fully assembled ranging from cafe bikes to Goldwing-sized monstrosities. This particular bike was gifted to me by him many years ago as my first bike, under a "if you an reassemble it, you can have it" mentality of teaching. At the time it was just the frame of a S700 and a S750 engine. Prior to this, I was riding around on an 83 CX650C Turbo, and when I had succeeded in the task of re-assembly, he ported the engine and fabricated the turbo setup - I'm probably years away from that knowledge but I'd gladly give you his e-mail address if you'd like specifics, he's done lots of turbo configurations in his lifetime.

You appear to have misunderstood my intentions. Jules and I go back and forth on the Garage forum all the time for fun, it's purely in good sport and we pick on each other very frequently. While the majority of my blanket statements were very stereotypical, It genuinely wasn't my intention to make people angry as much as it was to tease Jules. By now I know just what to say to have a response by him highlighted, and he takes it in great sport every time.

Please appreciate that I stated my opinions based on my geographic location and did NOT intend for it to be inferred for the whole country, or the world. I've ridden from California to Miami and I've seen one extreme from the other to riding through snow in Colorado, and my statements were NOT intended to apply to everywhere - I'm simply slightly bitter this weekend because the things I said DO apply to riders here, unfortunately. I have three guys at work who ride Harley's. They will NOT ride if it's not 75+ and Sunny, and they will NOT ride if their Harley T-shirt and bandanna haven't been washed by their wife.

Personally, I've seen enough Harley's break down here within the first year due to various mechanical problems that I typically just count it up as American-made design flaws, and I admit that has me slightly jaded and I will NOT buy a Harley in the immediate future for any reason. Wouldn't stop me from buying another Duc, or getting a BMW bike if I had the cash.

In the end you have to appreciate that it's a local-specific argument for me. I live somewhere, currently, where it snows 6 months out of the year so the majority of the riders are simply midlife crisis Harley office workers with less than a thousand miles under their belt. Quite terrifying, actually.



Originally posted by: Greenman
Narrow-minded opinion, etc, etc..

Please see above.

Cheers, and ride safe.

Fair enough, though it might be a good idea in the future to somehow indicate that you're just poking fun. That's one of those things that tend to easily get lost in text.

And that turbo-ed 750S still sounds like a wicked cool bike. :)

I can't say that I understand your apparent preference for chain drive though. I can understand concerns about shaft-jacking or simply the extra weight of a shaft-drive compared to a chain or a belt on an all-out racebike but I don't see it being that much of a liability on a street bike. As far as belts, I'd take them over chains every day of the week and twice on Sundays. Lighter than a chain, just as strong, no lube, no stretch, less lash, and they'll last well over 100,000 miles. Buell has been using belts without issue for several years. Still, the simplicity of a chain is a benefit, and you can't exactly replace a belt at the side of the road as easily as you can a chain.

ZV

I had a long conversation with Saga via PM this morning. He's a good guy...I have no problem with him. :thumbsup:
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
21,704
6,139
136
Saga, I still don't understand why you prefer chain over a belt. I know on the V-Rod you can run with a belt up to around 160hp, beyond that you'll shred them on a hard launch. But V-Rods weigh almost 700lbs, it seems that a 450lb sport bike could run 200hp with a belt and have no problems, you're just going to pull the front end off the ground or light up the tire.

 

Saga

Banned
Feb 18, 2005
2,718
1
0
Originally posted by: Greenman
Saga, I still don't understand why you prefer chain over a belt. I know on the V-Rod you can run with a belt up to around 160hp, beyond that you'll shred them on a hard launch. But V-Rods weigh almost 700lbs, it seems that a 450lb sport bike could run 200hp with a belt and have no problems, you're just going to pull the front end off the ground or light up the tire.

Honestly, the primary reason is this - and it's sure as hell not going to be the same for everybody.

I've been known to take a three or four day weekend from work and just go somewhere. Anywhere. Vegas? Sure, we've got that. I've done this on the Warrior, and on the ZX10R. Obviously, from a comfort factor, the Ninja is NOT a bike you want to be on for three hour plus trips unless there is a good reason behind it.. the few times I've taken it to Colorado I've typically tailored it to get it there and then run it for the twisties.

When it comes to being away from home on a belt driven bike, though it's never happened to me (and I hope never does) the innate fear is always there of being who knows where and having to replace a belt. Given all the guys I've talked to and the fact that nobody has ever actually had this happen, however I HAVE been on very long trips where I was 100+ miles from civilization and the last gas station I stopped by was the last person I'd seen for over an hour, and I HAVE broken chain links. I (almost) always carry links and a chain tool with me for just this reason, and who knows how fucked up my vacation could have gotten had I not.

Thats probably the biggest reason. The rest is preference.