Democrats lead hate campaign

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Michael Reagan: Democrats lead hate campaign
Juneau Empire Online ^ | July 4, 2004 | Michael Reagan

Posted on 07/04/2004 10:43:57 AM PDT by FairOpinion

America is witnessing one of the most despicable political campaigns in our long history - a presidential race filled with lies, distortions and outright hatred - and the offender is not the mythical Republican attack machine the Democrats keep talking about. It's the national Democrat party itself.

If anybody doubts the truth of this I invite them to look at one Michael Moore - slime master extraordinary, a practiced prevaricator, hater of America and radical socialist who has produced what nobody can deny is nothing less that a Democrat campaign commercial masquerading as a documentary.

Moore, however, is simply a symbol for an angry party gone mad. Utterly convinced of the fiction that President Bush stole the 2000 election from Al Gore, who by divine right as a Democrat was entitled to occupy the White House which his party regards as their private property, the Democrats are in a state of uncontrolled rage. The symbol of the Democrat party is no longer a donkey, it's a crazed jackal.

Consider the thrust of the Democrats' campaign rhetoric - that when it comes to the president, to his administration, and to Iraq there is no such thing as good news. To them, the only good news is bad news for America. They want us to fail in Iraq so they can blame the president. They want the economy to go into the tank so they can blame the president.

Twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, they bash the president no matter what he does. They don't, of course, tell you how they'd do things differently. They only tell you that everything President Bush does is wrong and then assure us that they could do it better. They demand that the president pay more attention to the U.N., for example, and when he does work with the U.N. they give him no credit.

They demand that the president turn Iraq over to Iraqis, and when he does they growl and mutter because he didn't do it the way they say they would have done it - but they won't tell us how they would have done it.

They are giddy over Michael Moore's hate film. Yet they have the nerve to claim that the discourse in politics is getting meaner and meaner and they point their fingers at the Republicans as the culprits. It's not the Republicans, however, who are supporting films such as Moore's incredibly deceptive "Fahrenheit 9/11," filled with false charges and cleverly distorted images such as showing President Bush interrupted by reporters during a golf game allegedly attacking terrorism when he was really talking about the Palestinian bombings.

But the Democrats so hate George W. Bush that they are willing to believe anything negative about him, even to the extent of supporting Moore in his exercise of slander and deceit when they should be condemning it and disassociating themselves from the film as decent people would do when confronted with its deceptions.

The fact is, it has never been about truth with the Democrats - it's always been about lies because they still believe the Bush-stole-the-election canard, and as a result they are willing to believe anything about the president even if it goes beyond the realm of reason, as Moore's film does.

Face it, Michael Moore hates America. He goes abroad and tells the people in Europe that we are the dumbest people on earth. "We Americans suffer from an enforced ignorance," he told the British press. "We don't know about anything that's happening outside our country. Our stupidity is embarrassing."

He explained 9/11 by blaming the United States: "We, the United States of America, are culpable in committing so many acts of terror and bloodshed that we had better get a clue about the culture of violence in which we have been active participants."

He insisted that the terrorists currently killing our soldiers in Iraq can be compared to our Revolutionary War heroes who fought off British oppression: "The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not 'insurgents' or 'terrorists or 'The Enemy.' They are the Revolution, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow - and they will win."

This goes beyond hate crime - it is nothing less than treason. And the Democrats, by aiding and abetting and praising this traitorous person, share his guilt.

That's how far their hatred has taken them.
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
http://www.nationalreview.com/novak/novak200312090858.asp


" Yet, I can see two reasons why leftists might really hate him.

Bush has stolen two things which the Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency, and the future.

Having finished on top in the Florida election by a small margin, the Bush team prevented the Democrats from stealing the election in the recount. But winning elections in a recount is a maneuver at which Democrats have been incomparably accomplished for generations. In most urban centers, the Democratic party controls the local workers who do the bulk of the counting and vote storage.

Therefore, Democrats felt the bitter loss in Florida with exquisite pain. The Republicans beat them on the streets, in the counting houses, and in the courts. That election belonged to them, Democrats think, and they have continued to cry out against a cosmic injustice.

After the election, each of the independent recounts of all the Florida votes showed that Bush had in fact won, with virtually the same margin as the election-night returns. But Democrats still feel they should have won, by a kind of cosmic right.

The second thing the Democrats think they own, by a kind of Hegelian dialectic, is the future. The Left has long believed that the Left defines the future, and points out the path of progress. In the past, moderate Republicans tended to respect this leftist claim, protesting only timidly, "Not so fast, not so much, not just yet." The Democrats got used to facing an essentially compliant, "me-too" opposition. They thought President Bush would be the same. He isn't. "
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
I'm not sure which is more vile: the over-developed fascination that liberals have for michael moore, or republicans throwing out charges of treason ;)
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
You guys sure to throw around the word "hate" quite a bit, don't you? It's almost like you really believe one side is guilty of aggressive politicking and yet the other is sparkling clean and innocent. Jesus, get a dose of reality boys, both democrats and republicans play dirty.

Moreover, Mike's problem with Moore seems to be that he has Moore confused with the democratic party. I seriously don't believe either has any control over the other.
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
You guys sure to throw around the word "hate" quite a bit, don't you? It's almost like you really believe one side is guilty of aggressive politicking and yet the other is sparkling clean and innocent. Jesus, get a dose of reality boys, both democrats and republicans play dirty.

Moreover, Mike's problem with Moore seems to be that he has Moore confused with the democratic party. I seriously don't believe either has any control over the other.

No, but the Democrats should have repudiated his nonsense, just as some liberals have: Baloney, Moore or less
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Michael Moore represents the Democratic campaign??

BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!


Someone might want to clue ol' Michael Reagan into Karl Rove's tactics. John McCain could bring up the "fathered a black child out of wedlock" claim about McCain's adopted Bangladeshi daughter.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Michael Reagan: Democrats lead hate campaign
Juneau Empire Online ^ | July 4, 2004 | Michael Reagan

Posted on 07/04/2004 10:43:57 AM PDT by FairOpinion

America is witnessing one of the most despicable political campaigns in our long history - a presidential race filled with lies, distortions and outright hatred - and the offender is not the mythical Republican attack machine the Democrats keep talking about. It's the national Democrat party itself.

If anybody doubts the truth of this I invite them to look at one Michael Moore - slime master extraordinary, a practiced prevaricator, hater of America an ... baa, baa, baa ...
Yaaawwwwnnnn. Sorry, that's as far as I got. Just another formulaic, hated-filled right-wing rant against someone they disagree with. Michael Reagan has no room to criticize others. He's a shameless hack who is exploiting his dad's name while trying to out-Coulter Coulter in spewing crackpot venom.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
That rant is so twisted that it's almost self-parody, as is the thread title.

If Michael Reagan married Anne Coulter, their children would undoubtedly have fangs...
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: conjur
Michael Moore represents the Democratic campaign??

BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!

Where'd you get that from?

From your original post.

That's not what I read.

"But the Democrats so hate George W. Bush that they are willing to believe anything negative about him, even to the extent of supporting Moore in his exercise of slander and deceit when they should be condemning it and disassociating themselves from the film as decent people would do when confronted with its deceptions."

"The fact is, it has never been about truth with the Democrats - it's always been about lies because they still believe the Bush-stole-the-election canard, and as a result they are willing to believe anything about the president even if it goes beyond the realm of reason, as Moore's film does".

Reagan's point is that the Dems should have repudiated Moore. He's not saying that Moore represents the "Democratic campaign".
 

sMiLeYz

Platinum Member
Feb 3, 2003
2,696
0
76
Republicans should repudiate Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Micheal Savage, William Kristol, Washington Times, NY Post, National Review... and we'll get rid of Micheal Moore.

Otherwise all bets are off.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
I have always wanted to ask this question

If Racists and KKK and Skinheads voted.. do you think they would be Republicans or Democrats?
 

NeoV

Diamond Member
Apr 18, 2000
9,504
2
81
Please - don't come crying that Moore's film may distort things - listen to Rush, Hannity, Coulter, Savage, M.Reagan, etc, etc on a daily basis - at lease most of Moore's stuff in F 9-11 is based on facts.

Besides, he made this movie all by himself - the Dem party didn't ask him, tell him, or help him make it.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: NeoV
Please - don't come crying that Moore's film may distort things - listen to Rush, Hannity, Coulter, Savage, M.Reagan, etc, etc on a daily basis - at lease most of Moore's stuff in F 9-11 is based on facts.

Besides, he made this movie all by himself - the Dem party didn't ask him, tell him, or help him make it.

And Moore doesn't have a direct pipe to our troops as does Limbaugh's filth.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: dahunan
I have always wanted to ask this question

If Racists and KKK and Skinheads voted.. do you think they would be Republicans or Democrats?

Green Party, of course!
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
31,077
2,706
126
America is witnessing one of the most despicable political campaigns in our long history - a presidential race filled with lies, distortions and outright hatred - and the offender is not the mythical Republican attack machine the Democrats keep talking about. It's the national Democrat party itself.

You got that right. After the left wing fringe of the Democratic party (85% of them) realized that they were going to lose - again - they decided it was time to pull out all the stops.
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
31,077
2,706
126
He insisted that the terrorists currently killing our soldiers in Iraq can be compared to our Revolutionary War heroes who fought off British oppression: "The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not 'insurgents' or 'terrorists or 'The Enemy.' They are the Revolution, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow - and they will win."

I dont plan on watching that piece of garbage farenheit (or any other of his mockumentaries), but Im glad this heads up was posted giving insight into how this despicable man thinks.
 

Painman

Diamond Member
Feb 27, 2000
3,728
29
86
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
America is witnessing one of the most despicable political campaigns in our long history - a presidential race filled with lies, distortions and outright hatred - and the offender is not the mythical Republican attack machine the Democrats keep talking about. It's the national Democrat party itself.

You got that right. After the left wing fringe of the Democratic party (85% of them) realized that they were going to lose - again - they decided it was time to pull out all the stops.

:music: All the girls are in love with me, I'm a teenage Limbaughtomy :music:

Seriously dude. Spewing crap like that just makes you look like the same kind of wild-eyed partisan hack you seem to think "85%" of the Democratic party is. Get a grip.
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
31,077
2,706
126
Originally posted by: Painman
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
America is witnessing one of the most despicable political campaigns in our long history - a presidential race filled with lies, distortions and outright hatred - and the offender is not the mythical Republican attack machine the Democrats keep talking about. It's the national Democrat party itself.

You got that right. After the left wing fringe of the Democratic party (85% of them) realized that they were going to lose - again - they decided it was time to pull out all the stops.

:music: All the girls are in love with me, I'm a teenage Limbaughtomy :music:

Seriously dude. Spewing crap like that just makes you look like the same kind of wild-eyed partisan hack you seem to think "85%" of the Democratic party is. Get a grip.

Name me more than 15% that isnt.