Democrats for Trump

[Art&Science]

Here's a sampling of Democrats who've changed sides and are going to vote for Trump - lots of Barack voters, Sanders supporters, Bill Clinton voters. Listen to what they are saying. They don't want Hillary, they don't want Democrats or Republicans - interesting to listen to.

https://youtu.be/7Ag8dmCQN0E

(Infowars video)

 

[Mxylplyx]

Lol. Infowars.

 

[DrDoug]

Lol. Infowars.

No shit...lol! Places like RedState are saying the same shit because they don't want to admit that it's their own beloved conservative Republicans that put Trump in the position that he now enjoys. They are desperate to blame Democrats for the takeover of their party by a man who embraces racist philosophies. No, all Trump had to do to take over the Republican party was to dispense with the dogwhistles and just come right out and say racist shit to drive enough conservatives into his camp. By cutting out the age-old dogwhistles that the Republican politicians have successtully used in the past, he won the chunk of the party that hates people of color. All Republicans are not racist, as their own primary shows since Trump won with the largest minority of the majority which just happens to include a large number of racists and nationalists. Hillary made a direct appeal to them, which was a brilliant move on her part.

But yeah, Infowars for facts? The Onion is a more accurate news source.

 

[senseamp]

Love the "I got an abortion, but we need to take care of that" lady. Seems like a perfect Trump supporter.

 

[brycejones]

Infowars...enough said.

 

[compuwiz1]

Sounds like some Alex Jones' cult kind of shit.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

hmmmm should I waste the time watching that, nope.

 

[MongGrel]

Here's a sampling of Democrats who've changed sides and are going to vote for Trump - lots of a couple of Barack voters, Sanders supporters, Bill Clinton voters. Listen to what they are saying. They don't want Hillary, they don't want Democrats or Republicans - interesting to listen to.

https://youtu.be/7Ag8dmCQN0E

FTFY.

 

[BxgJ]

Shouldn't links to infowars vids have a warning label, when it's not obvious from the link it's infowars?

Noted. -DrPizza

 

[IronWing]

It's a shame someone spends that kind of money on her teeth and that kind of time on her makeup and can't land a gig somewhere in TV land.

 

[Capt Caveman]

All of the OP's posts are retarded. Infowars?

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Shouldn't links to infowars vids have a warning label, when it's not obvious from the link it's infowars?

same goes for any video post that leans as heavily to the left.

 

[sportage]

THESE PEOPLE are not democrats.
They "may have been" registered as a democrat, but in all honesty they never voted for the democrat.
They always voted for the odd-ball like Ross Perot and Ralph Nader.
They never voted for the democrat.

Still, they remain registered as a democrat.
Probably because they are simply too lazy to switch party affiliation or just don't know how to. And they distrust republicans as much as they distrust democrats.
However, for them Donald Trump is no republican.
Trump is their Perot and Nader lumped into one.

Thing is.... Donald Trump is their perfect odd-ball candidate.
Donald Trump is everything these democrats/non-democrats have always wanted and waited so long for.

Perot let the down, Nader let them down, but this time they truly believe Trump can pull it off.

For these odd-ball democrats that never actually vote democrat, even if that meant staying at home and not voting, for these odd-balls Donald Trump is perfection.
Trump stirs them up better than Ross Perot, and is nuttier than Ralph Nader.
Perfection in their eyes.

These loosely termed democrats were never going to vote Hillary, regardless. And they never voted Obama.
They never voted Bush and they never voted Kerry.
They voted Nader, or Perot, or they stayed at home.
And out of the blue along comes Donald trump.
Neither a democrat nor republican, frankly.
Simply perfection! (in their eyes)

 

[werepossum]

Shouldn't links to infowars vids have a warning label, when it's not obvious from the link it's infowars?

Noted. -DrPizza

No. It should have TWO warning labels.

 

[jman19]

No. It should have TWO warning labels.

These two seem fitting:

 

[zinfamous]

These two seem fitting:

It'd be nice if we could implement an algorithm where forum bots crawl through posts and, after the bots detect an "x" number of links to sites like infowars and the like, or constant shit-posting of images and links without real commentary or valid argument related to such images and links, that user's avatar gets a tinfoil hat stamped on the top which remains in place for no less than 3 months at a time.

Since we need those foil hats to effectively identify such useless individuals in public, we need something like this in online forums, as well.

 

[MovingTarget]

No. Democrats do not support Trump. They may not be crazy about Hillary, but they aren't crazy. Infowars link be damned, here in reality if there is a group of democratic individuals supporting Trump, their true numbers statistically approach zero the more they hear him speak.

 

[umbrella39]

Oddly enough the Art&Science alt has not returned to his thread...

 

[sm625]

This is the kind of thing that will turn democrats away from Hitlery:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...s-journalist-after-post-hillarys-healthits-or

Then you have the Dr Drew story. There is a constant stream of these stories that all point to a Clinton-owned media. Liberals might be used to being dumbed down and spoonfed a controlled view of the world, but eventually this sort of censorship tends to break through.

 

[zinfamous]

This is the kind of thing that will turn democrats away from Hitlery:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...s-journalist-after-post-hillarys-healthits-or

Then you have the Dr Drew story. There is a constant stream of these stories that all point to a Clinton-owned media. Liberals might be used to being dumbed down and spoonfed a controlled view of the world, but eventually this sort of censorship tends to break through.

In what way does it seem rational to compare Hillary Clinton to Hitler? I am curious, so please provide your cogent reasoning to support this argument.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

In what way does it seem rational to compare Hillary Clinton to Hitler? I am curious, so please provide your cogent reasoning to support this argument.

well duh, H is the first letter of her first name and H is the first letter of hitler's last name, are you blind man??

 

[Meghan54]

This is the kind of thing that will turn democrats away from Hitlery:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...s-journalist-after-post-hillarys-healthits-or

Then you have the Dr Drew story. There is a constant stream of these stories that all point to a Clinton-owned media. Liberals might be used to being dumbed down and spoonfed a controlled view of the world, but eventually this sort of censorship tends to break through.

Why do you think that? Because a writer began linking conspiracy theory videos from Youtube and Huffpo didn't want any association with that conspiracy shit posted from Paul Joseph Watson? I'm guessing the "writer" would feel more at home at Brietbart or RT or Redstate....the sites that pander to unfounded conspiracy crap. Glad Huffpo refused to allow their site to be hijacked by a troll.

 

[Commodus]

Not shown: the considerably larger number of Republicans voting for Clinton (including HP's Meg Whitman) because Trump is vile enough to make Clinton look like a saint.

Also, as a reminder: minority and LGBT voters don't have the luxury of a protest vote for Trump (or Johnson, or Stein) this election. If he wins, they get screwed over.

 

[nickqt]

This is the kind of thing that will turn democrats away from Hitlery:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...s-journalist-after-post-hillarys-healthits-or

Then you have the Dr Drew story. There is a constant stream of these stories that all point to a Clinton-owned media. Liberals might be used to being dumbed down and spoonfed a controlled view of the world, but eventually this sort of censorship tends to break through.

The sheer amount of projection and cognitive dissonance in this post is fucking breathtaking.

Thanks for a clear example of just how delusional the average US conservative Republican really is.

Now, get back to monitoring the rest of the dogshit-tier media outlets you put your faith in, for news on the ongoing Federal takeover of America under Operation Jade Helm. And good luck in the coming days as Obama takes your guns and revokes your freedoms!