Originally posted by: smack Down
Sorry, It doesn't matter the law says otherwise. They have to show that the unauthorized person damage the laptop to void the warranty and they can only void the warrant on the part that was damaged by the unauthorized repair.
Wrong. You started by saying warranties couldn't be voided, and now you're backpedaling, but you still aren't right. Anything written into the contract in a legal way can specify conditions for terminating the contract (voiding the warranty). You can keep arguing with me (although I will tire of it eventually), but you cannot argue with the FTC. Here is a page explaining the Magnuson-Moss Act in some detail:
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/warranty.htm#Magnuson-Moss
A quote from the page:
"While you cannot use a tie-in sales provision, your warranty need not cover use of replacement parts, repairs, or maintenance that is inappropriate for your product. The following is an example of a permissible provision that excludes coverage of such things.
'While necessary maintenance or repairs on your AudioMundo Stereo System can be performed by any company, we recommend that you use only authorized AudioMundo dealers. Improper or incorrectly performed maintenance or repair voids this warranty.'"
Just one example of a permissible voiding of a warranty, and it says nothing about the improper maintenance being done by the consumer.
The reason I knew you were wrong from the start is that your belief stems from a basic misunderstanding of what contracts really are. A contract can be made to specify anything that does not contradict some law in effect. This includes clauses in warranties (which are contracts) designed to void the warranty if some trigger situation occurs.
Here's the text of the Magnuson-Moss Act if you want to dig deeper:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sup_01_15_10_50.html
I did some reading, and talk of the Act seems to be popular on car-modding forums, where people are often of the delusion that no modification they make to a car can void any warranty. That's not true. Service contracts are even easier to void, from what I can see, and there's also a big difference between a full and an extended warranty.